From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:58149) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1avkCr-0007hW-E4 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 28 Apr 2016 07:34:06 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1avkCm-0005ZK-Ry for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 28 Apr 2016 07:34:05 -0400 Received: from mail-lf0-x244.google.com ([2a00:1450:4010:c07::244]:36669) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1avkCm-0005ZF-Kk for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 28 Apr 2016 07:34:00 -0400 Received: by mail-lf0-x244.google.com with SMTP id y84so13061703lfc.3 for ; Thu, 28 Apr 2016 04:34:00 -0700 (PDT) References: <1461186921-14977-1-git-send-email-sergey.fedorov@linaro.org> <87lh3ydluw.fsf@linaro.org> From: Sergey Fedorov Message-ID: <5721F525.1010404@gmail.com> Date: Thu, 28 Apr 2016 14:33:57 +0300 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <87lh3ydluw.fsf@linaro.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v4 00/10] tcg: Direct block chaining clean-up List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: =?UTF-8?Q?Alex_Benn=c3=a9e?= , Sergey Fedorov Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org, Paolo Bonzini , Peter Crosthwaite , Richard Henderson On 28/04/16 14:16, Alex Bennée wrote: > Sergey Fedorov writes: > >> From: Sergey Fedorov >> >> This series combines a set of patches which is meant to improve overall code >> structure and readability of the direct block chaining mechanism. The other >> point is to make a step towards thread safety of TB chainig. >> >> The series' tree can be found in a public git repository [1]. >> >> [1] https://github.com/sergefdrv/qemu/tree/tb-chaining-cleanup-v4 > I've run into a bunch of merge failures whilst trying to build a > combined tree. A bunch in the tcg/* files due to atomic patching fixes > now in rth/tcg-next and the final one due to the code motion in cpu-exec > from the misc clean-ups. > > It might be worth re-basing at least on tcg-next? Okay, I'll do a re-base and send v5 today. Kind regards, Sergey