From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:60663) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1axEag-0006XZ-Uu for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 02 May 2016 10:12:57 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1axEaU-0006l8-VB for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 02 May 2016 10:12:45 -0400 References: <1461960516-4717-1-git-send-email-eblake@redhat.com> <20160502072705.GA4882@noname.redhat.com> From: Eric Blake Message-ID: <57276032.7080601@redhat.com> Date: Mon, 2 May 2016 08:12:02 -0600 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20160502072705.GA4882@noname.redhat.com> Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="KEbG3M46NXccre0sdGWtc5JQ7Lq9jcKmG" Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v4 00/14] block: kill sector-based blk_write/read List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Kevin Wolf Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org, qemu-block@nongnu.org This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 4880 and 3156) --KEbG3M46NXccre0sdGWtc5JQ7Lq9jcKmG Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 05/02/2016 01:27 AM, Kevin Wolf wrote: > Am 29.04.2016 um 22:08 hat Eric Blake geschrieben: >> 2.7 material, depends on Kevin's block-next: >> git://repo.or.cz/qemu/kevin.git block-next >> >> Previously posted as part of a larger NBD series [1] (at v3, explainin= g >> why this is v4), but these are independent enough to make for easier >> review on their own, and is mostly orthogonal to Kevin's recent work >> to also kill sector interfaces from the driver. >> >> [1] https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/2016-04/msg03526.htm= l >> >> Also available as a tag at this location: >> git fetch git://repo.or.cz/qemu/ericb.git nbd-block-v4 >=20 > If you send a v5, can you please make sure to explicitly CC qemu-block?= > This series ended up only partially and without cover letter in my mail= > folder that I generally use for processing patches, which is useless if= > you want me to merge this series through my tree. Sure, will do (don't know why qemu-block as a list is not auto-assigned to all nbd/ files; maybe we need a MAINTAINERS update there. But this patch touched more than just those files) >=20 > I also think it's a good rule of thumb that at least one person (the on= e > who is supposed to merge the series) should be directly copied on the > whole series instead of just parts of it. I'm guessing Max and you are the two best candidates, according to get_maintainers.pl for include/block/block_int.h? --=20 Eric Blake eblake redhat com +1-919-301-3266 Libvirt virtualization library http://libvirt.org --KEbG3M46NXccre0sdGWtc5JQ7Lq9jcKmG Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 Comment: Public key at http://people.redhat.com/eblake/eblake.gpg Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/ iQEcBAEBCAAGBQJXJ2AyAAoJEKeha0olJ0NqxJwH/09sr+R++bNstSGE8aSK3p4l eFZX/7yU2Gn5G3HT7B3nFxhzSfBDcGgBedgvpctcxRP9rw+/+mI71XqETzGB9ggU NC2jO3A28ppeWnUVND4BM+6LU5x91Yx13rKnReSHLJsi9XrKN2HGHgPuZptAkn8W 95Kqp+JyHeFN2nXz0If7B61m9vN9s7KItUrxwNCEETL3YFgLL9TxQ8+t8vNTDz3p u/Lj2PvioYDVSrcCtixz3kMdBhBitZl1jtgZ5ywg0yixj94JUupFc+ZM8C8jBKCw Cr8qR6vHopY2sZbj4TNjcK4go7V6+yoD+0vxL911sB75tkIe8ntcYpogk1zLpPU= =5ZTr -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --KEbG3M46NXccre0sdGWtc5JQ7Lq9jcKmG--