From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:52515)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <pbonzini@redhat.com>) id 1b0BJY-0004Kq-Mg
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 10 May 2016 13:19:21 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <pbonzini@redhat.com>) id 1b0BJT-0001wF-FU
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 10 May 2016 13:19:19 -0400
Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:53018)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <pbonzini@redhat.com>) id 1b0BJT-0001vT-86
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 10 May 2016 13:19:15 -0400
References: <1461600281-23048-1-git-send-email-rjones@redhat.com>
	<20160509132449.GF3372@stefanha-x1.localdomain>
	<CAJSP0QU6reLA6VR6yFk25dWpg4ConQ-YhkYOeGH+VhPpbySaoA@mail.gmail.com>
	<20160509164814.GS1683@redhat.com>
	<62d1c78f-b216-bdc0-54df-97bca92962ca@redhat.com>
	<20160509213708.GT1683@redhat.com>
From: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <5732180C.2090905@redhat.com>
Date: Tue, 10 May 2016 19:19:08 +0200
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <20160509213708.GT1683@redhat.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v6] Add optionrom compatible with fw_cfg
 DMA version
List-Id: <qemu-devel.nongnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/options/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/>
List-Post: <mailto:qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=subscribe>
To: "Richard W.M. Jones" <rjones@redhat.com>, Laszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com>
Cc: Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@gmail.com>, qemu-devel <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>, =?UTF-8?Q?Marc_Mar=c3=ad?= <marc.mari.barcelo@gmail.com>, Eduardo Habkost <ehabkost@redhat.com>, "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>, Gerd Hoffmann <kraxel@redhat.com>, Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com>, Richard Henderson <rth@twiddle.net>



On 09/05/2016 23:37, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> FWIW the response from the LLVM developers:
> 
>   https://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=27688

Why the heck are they saying that -fno-toplevel-reorder is "gone" (or
deprecated in the duplicate PR)?

Paolo