From: Marcel Apfelbaum <marcel@redhat.com>
To: Cao jin <caoj.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com>, qemu-devel@nongnu.org
Cc: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>,
Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v5 09/11] pci bridge dev: change msi property type
Date: Sun, 15 May 2016 16:25:59 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <573878E7.7070807@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1462508442-9407-10-git-send-email-caoj.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com>
On 05/06/2016 07:20 AM, Cao jin wrote:
> From bit to enum OnOffAuto.
>
> cc: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>
> cc: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>
> cc: Marcel Apfelbaum <marcel@redhat.com>
> Signed-off-by: Cao jin <caoj.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com>
> ---
>
> Actually, I am not quite sure this device need this change, RFC.
>
Well, it already has the 'msi' property, so we may want to make it standard 'OnOffAuto'.
One problem I can see is the change of semantics. Until now msi=on means 'auto'. From now on
it means 'force msi=on', fail otherwise. If I got this right, old machines having msi=on
will failed to start on platforms with msibroken=true, right?
Maybe we should preserve the semantics for old machines? (this patch does not actually
affect the semantics, but patch 11/11 should, otherwise why change it to OnOffAuto, right? )
Thanks,
Marcel
> hw/pci-bridge/pci_bridge_dev.c | 14 ++++++++------
> 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/hw/pci-bridge/pci_bridge_dev.c b/hw/pci-bridge/pci_bridge_dev.c
> index 32f4daa..9e31f0e 100644
> --- a/hw/pci-bridge/pci_bridge_dev.c
> +++ b/hw/pci-bridge/pci_bridge_dev.c
> @@ -41,9 +41,10 @@ struct PCIBridgeDev {
>
> MemoryRegion bar;
> uint8_t chassis_nr;
> -#define PCI_BRIDGE_DEV_F_MSI_REQ 0
> -#define PCI_BRIDGE_DEV_F_SHPC_REQ 1
> +#define PCI_BRIDGE_DEV_F_SHPC_REQ 0
> uint32_t flags;
> +
> + OnOffAuto msi;
> };
> typedef struct PCIBridgeDev PCIBridgeDev;
>
> @@ -65,7 +66,7 @@ static int pci_bridge_dev_initfn(PCIDevice *dev)
> }
> } else {
> /* MSI is not applicable without SHPC */
> - bridge_dev->flags &= ~(1 << PCI_BRIDGE_DEV_F_MSI_REQ);
> + bridge_dev->msi = ON_OFF_AUTO_OFF;
> }
>
> err = slotid_cap_init(dev, 0, bridge_dev->chassis_nr, 0);
> @@ -73,7 +74,8 @@ static int pci_bridge_dev_initfn(PCIDevice *dev)
> goto slotid_error;
> }
>
> - if ((bridge_dev->flags & (1 << PCI_BRIDGE_DEV_F_MSI_REQ)) &&
> + if ((bridge_dev->msi == ON_OFF_AUTO_AUTO ||
> + bridge_dev->msi == ON_OFF_AUTO_ON) &&
> msi_nonbroken) {
> err = msi_init(dev, 0, 1, true, true);
> if (err < 0) {
> @@ -146,8 +148,8 @@ static Property pci_bridge_dev_properties[] = {
> /* Note: 0 is not a legal chassis number. */
> DEFINE_PROP_UINT8(PCI_BRIDGE_DEV_PROP_CHASSIS_NR, PCIBridgeDev, chassis_nr,
> 0),
> - DEFINE_PROP_BIT(PCI_BRIDGE_DEV_PROP_MSI, PCIBridgeDev, flags,
> - PCI_BRIDGE_DEV_F_MSI_REQ, true),
> + DEFINE_PROP_ON_OFF_AUTO(PCI_BRIDGE_DEV_PROP_MSI, PCIBridgeDev, msi,
> + ON_OFF_AUTO_AUTO),
> DEFINE_PROP_BIT(PCI_BRIDGE_DEV_PROP_SHPC, PCIBridgeDev, flags,
> PCI_BRIDGE_DEV_F_SHPC_REQ, true),
> DEFINE_PROP_END_OF_LIST(),
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-05-15 13:26 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-05-06 4:20 [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v5 00/11] Add param Error ** for msi_init() Cao jin
2016-05-06 4:20 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v5 01/11] fix some coding style problems Cao jin
2016-05-15 12:36 ` Marcel Apfelbaum
2016-05-06 4:20 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v5 02/11] change pvscsi_init_msi() type to void Cao jin
2016-05-06 5:48 ` Cao jin
2016-05-06 4:20 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v5 03/11] megasas: Fix Cao jin
2016-05-06 5:43 ` Cao jin
2016-05-15 12:37 ` Marcel Apfelbaum
2016-05-06 4:20 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v5 04/11] mptsas: change .realize function name Cao jin
2016-05-06 5:53 ` Cao jin
2016-05-06 4:20 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v5 05/11] usb xhci: change msi/msix property type Cao jin
2016-05-06 4:20 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v5 06/11] intel-hda: change msi " Cao jin
2016-05-06 4:20 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v5 07/11] mptsas: " Cao jin
2016-05-06 4:20 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v5 08/11] megasas: change msi/msix " Cao jin
2016-05-06 4:20 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v5 09/11] pci bridge dev: change msi " Cao jin
2016-05-15 13:25 ` Marcel Apfelbaum [this message]
2016-05-17 7:39 ` Cao jin
2016-05-17 7:38 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2016-05-23 2:22 ` Cao jin
2016-05-23 9:55 ` Marcel Apfelbaum
2016-05-06 4:20 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v5 10/11] pci core: assert ENOSPC when add capability Cao jin
2016-05-15 13:10 ` Marcel Apfelbaum
2016-05-17 3:00 ` Cao jin
2016-05-06 4:20 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v5 11/11] pci: Convert msi_init() to Error and fix callers to check it Cao jin
2016-05-15 13:41 ` Marcel Apfelbaum
2016-05-17 10:08 ` Cao jin
2016-05-23 10:06 ` Marcel Apfelbaum
2016-05-23 12:51 ` Cao jin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=573878E7.7070807@redhat.com \
--to=marcel@redhat.com \
--cc=armbru@redhat.com \
--cc=caoj.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com \
--cc=mst@redhat.com \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).