From: Jason Wang <jasowang@redhat.com>
To: wexu@redhat.com, qemu-devel@nongnu.org
Cc: victork@redhat.com, mst@redhat.com, yvugenfi@redhat.com,
marcel@redhat.com, dfleytma@redhat.com
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [ RFC Patch v6 2/3] virtio-net rsc: support coalescing ipv6 tcp traffic
Date: Mon, 30 May 2016 12:25:01 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <574BC09D.5050705@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1464453454-5703-3-git-send-email-wexu@redhat.com>
On 2016年05月29日 00:37, wexu@redhat.com wrote:
> From: Wei Xu <wexu@redhat.com>
>
> Most stuffs are like ipv4 2 differences between ipv4 and ipv6.
>
> 1. Fragment length in ipv4 header includes itself, while it's not
> included for ipv6, thus means ipv6 can carry a real '65535' payload.
>
> 2. IPv6 header does not need calculate header checksum.
>
> Signed-off-by: Wei Xu <wexu@redhat.com>
> ---
> hw/net/virtio-net.c | 152 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---
> 1 file changed, 144 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/hw/net/virtio-net.c b/hw/net/virtio-net.c
> index b3bb63b..cc8cbe4 100644
> --- a/hw/net/virtio-net.c
> +++ b/hw/net/virtio-net.c
> @@ -53,6 +53,10 @@
> /* header length value in ip header without option */
> #define VIRTIO_NET_IP4_HEADER_LENGTH 5
>
> +#define ETH_IP6_HDR_SZ (ETH_HDR_SZ + IP6_HDR_SZ)
> +#define VIRTIO_NET_IP6_ADDR_SIZE 32 /* ipv6 saddr + daddr */
> +#define VIRTIO_NET_MAX_IP6_PAYLOAD VIRTIO_NET_MAX_TCP_PAYLOAD
> +
> /* Purge coalesced packets timer interval, This value affects the performance
> a lot, and should be tuned carefully, '300000'(300us) is the recommended
> value to pass the WHQL test, '50000' can gain 2x netperf throughput with
> @@ -1724,6 +1728,25 @@ static void virtio_net_rsc_extract_unit4(NetRscChain *chain,
> unit->payload = htons(*unit->ip_plen) - ip_hdrlen - unit->tcp_hdrlen;
> }
>
> +static void virtio_net_rsc_extract_unit6(NetRscChain *chain,
> + const uint8_t *buf, NetRscUnit* unit)
> +{
> + uint16_t hdr_len;
> + struct ip6_header *ip6;
> +
> + hdr_len = ((VirtIONet *)(chain->n))->guest_hdr_len;
> + ip6 = (struct ip6_header *)(buf + hdr_len + sizeof(struct eth_header));
> + unit->ip = ip6;
> + unit->ip_plen = &(ip6->ip6_ctlun.ip6_un1.ip6_un1_plen);
> + unit->tcp = (struct tcp_header *)(((uint8_t *)unit->ip)\
> + + sizeof(struct ip6_header));
> + unit->tcp_hdrlen = (htons(unit->tcp->th_offset_flags) & 0xF000) >> 10;
> +
> + /* There is a difference between payload lenght in ipv4 and v6,
> + ip header is excluded in ipv6 */
> + unit->payload = htons(*unit->ip_plen) - unit->tcp_hdrlen;
> +}
> +
> static void virtio_net_rsc_ipv4_checksum(struct virtio_net_hdr *vhdr,
> struct ip_header *ip)
> {
> @@ -1742,7 +1765,9 @@ static size_t virtio_net_rsc_drain_seg(NetRscChain *chain, NetRscSeg *seg)
> struct virtio_net_hdr *h;
>
> h = (struct virtio_net_hdr *)seg->buf;
> - virtio_net_rsc_ipv4_checksum(h, seg->unit.ip);
> + if ((chain->proto == ETH_P_IP) && seg->is_coalesced) {
> + virtio_net_rsc_ipv4_checksum(h, seg->unit.ip);
> + }
> ret = virtio_net_do_receive(seg->nc, seg->buf, seg->size);
> QTAILQ_REMOVE(&chain->buffers, seg, next);
> g_free(seg->buf);
> @@ -1798,7 +1823,7 @@ static void virtio_net_rsc_cache_buf(NetRscChain *chain, NetClientState *nc,
> hdr_len = chain->n->guest_hdr_len;
> seg = g_malloc(sizeof(NetRscSeg));
> seg->buf = g_malloc(hdr_len + sizeof(struct eth_header)\
> - + VIRTIO_NET_MAX_TCP_PAYLOAD);
> + + sizeof(struct ip6_header) + VIRTIO_NET_MAX_TCP_PAYLOAD);
> memcpy(seg->buf, buf, size);
> seg->size = size;
> seg->packets = 1;
> @@ -1809,7 +1834,18 @@ static void virtio_net_rsc_cache_buf(NetRscChain *chain, NetClientState *nc,
> QTAILQ_INSERT_TAIL(&chain->buffers, seg, next);
> chain->stat.cache++;
>
> - virtio_net_rsc_extract_unit4(chain, seg->buf, &seg->unit);
> + switch (chain->proto) {
> + case ETH_P_IP:
> + virtio_net_rsc_extract_unit4(chain, seg->buf, &seg->unit);
> + break;
> +
> + case ETH_P_IPV6:
> + virtio_net_rsc_extract_unit6(chain, seg->buf, &seg->unit);
> + break;
> +
> + default:
> + g_assert_not_reached();
> + }
> }
>
> static int32_t virtio_net_rsc_handle_ack(NetRscChain *chain,
> @@ -1929,6 +1965,24 @@ static int32_t virtio_net_rsc_coalesce4(NetRscChain *chain, NetRscSeg *seg,
> return virtio_net_rsc_coalesce_data(chain, seg, buf, unit);
> }
>
> +static int32_t virtio_net_rsc_coalesce6(NetRscChain *chain, NetRscSeg *seg,
> + const uint8_t *buf, size_t size, NetRscUnit *unit)
> +{
> + struct ip6_header *ip1, *ip2;
> +
> + ip1 = (struct ip6_header *)(unit->ip);
> + ip2 = (struct ip6_header *)(seg->unit.ip);
> + if (memcmp(&ip1->ip6_src, &ip2->ip6_src, sizeof(struct in6_address))
> + || memcmp(&ip1->ip6_dst, &ip2->ip6_dst, sizeof(struct in6_address))
> + || (unit->tcp->th_sport ^ seg->unit.tcp->th_sport)
> + || (unit->tcp->th_dport ^ seg->unit.tcp->th_dport)) {
> + chain->stat.no_match++;
> + return RSC_NO_MATCH;
> + }
> +
> + return virtio_net_rsc_coalesce_data(chain, seg, buf, unit);
> +}
> +
> /* Pakcets with 'SYN' should bypass, other flag should be sent after drain
> * to prevent out of order */
> static int virtio_net_rsc_tcp_ctrl_check(NetRscChain *chain,
> @@ -1981,7 +2035,11 @@ static size_t virtio_net_rsc_do_coalesce(NetRscChain *chain, NetClientState *nc,
> NetRscSeg *seg, *nseg;
>
> QTAILQ_FOREACH_SAFE(seg, &chain->buffers, next, nseg) {
> - ret = virtio_net_rsc_coalesce4(chain, seg, buf, size, unit);
> + if (chain->proto == ETH_P_IP) {
> + ret = virtio_net_rsc_coalesce4(chain, seg, buf, size, unit);
> + } else {
> + ret = virtio_net_rsc_coalesce6(chain, seg, buf, size, unit);
> + }
>
> if (ret == RSC_FINAL) {
> if (virtio_net_rsc_drain_seg(chain, seg) == 0) {
> @@ -2106,13 +2164,82 @@ static size_t virtio_net_rsc_receive4(NetRscChain *chain, NetClientState* nc,
> return virtio_net_rsc_do_coalesce(chain, nc, buf, size, &unit);
> }
>
> +static int32_t virtio_net_rsc_sanity_check6(NetRscChain *chain,
> + struct ip6_header *ip6,
> + const uint8_t *buf, size_t size)
> +{
> + uint16_t ip_len;
> + uint16_t hdr_len;
> +
> + hdr_len = ((VirtIONet *)(chain->n))->guest_hdr_len;
> + if (size < (hdr_len + sizeof(struct eth_header) + sizeof(struct ip6_header)
> + + sizeof(tcp_header))) {
> + return RSC_BYPASS;
> + }
> +
> + if (((ip6->ip6_ctlun.ip6_un1.ip6_un1_flow & 0xF0) >> 4)
> + != IP_HEADER_VERSION_6) {
> + return RSC_BYPASS;
> + }
> +
> + /* Both option and protocol is checked in this */
> + if (ip6->ip6_ctlun.ip6_un1.ip6_un1_nxt != IPPROTO_TCP) {
> + chain->stat.bypass_not_tcp++;
> + return RSC_BYPASS;
> + }
> +
> + ip_len = htons(ip6->ip6_ctlun.ip6_un1.ip6_un1_plen);
> + if (ip_len < sizeof(struct tcp_header)
> + || ip_len > (size - hdr_len - sizeof(struct eth_header)
> + - sizeof(struct ip6_header))) {
> + chain->stat.ip_hacked++;
> + return RSC_BYPASS;
> + }
> +
> + return RSC_WANT;
> +}
> +
> +static size_t virtio_net_rsc_receive6(void *opq, NetClientState* nc,
> + const uint8_t *buf, size_t size)
> +{
> + int32_t ret;
> + uint16_t hdr_len;
> + NetRscChain *chain;
> + NetRscUnit unit;
> +
> + chain = (NetRscChain *)opq;
> + hdr_len = ((VirtIONet *)(chain->n))->guest_hdr_len;
> + virtio_net_rsc_extract_unit6(chain, buf, &unit);
Same issue as ipv4, looks not safe if you analyze header before doing
sanity check.
> + if (RSC_WANT != virtio_net_rsc_sanity_check6(chain,
> + unit.ip, buf, size)) {
> + return virtio_net_do_receive(nc, buf, size);
> + }
> +
> + ret = virtio_net_rsc_tcp_ctrl_check(chain, unit.tcp);
> + if (ret == RSC_BYPASS) {
> + return virtio_net_do_receive(nc, buf, size);
> + } else if (ret == RSC_FINAL) {
> + return virtio_net_rsc_drain_flow(chain, nc, buf, size,
> + ((hdr_len + sizeof(struct eth_header)) + 8),
> + VIRTIO_NET_IP6_ADDR_SIZE,
> + hdr_len + sizeof(struct eth_header) + sizeof(struct ip6_header),
> + VIRTIO_NET_TCP_PORT_SIZE);
> + }
> +
> + if (virtio_net_rsc_empty_cache(chain, nc, buf, size)) {
> + return size;
> + }
> +
> + return virtio_net_rsc_do_coalesce(chain, nc, buf, size, &unit);
> +}
> +
> static NetRscChain *virtio_net_rsc_lookup_chain(VirtIONet * n,
> NetClientState *nc,
> uint16_t proto)
> {
> NetRscChain *chain;
>
> - if (proto != (uint16_t)ETH_P_IP) {
> + if ((proto != (uint16_t)ETH_P_IP) && (proto != (uint16_t)ETH_P_IPV6)) {
> return NULL;
> }
>
> @@ -2125,8 +2252,13 @@ static NetRscChain *virtio_net_rsc_lookup_chain(VirtIONet * n,
> chain = g_malloc(sizeof(*chain));
> chain->n = n;
> chain->proto = proto;
> - chain->max_payload = VIRTIO_NET_MAX_IP4_PAYLOAD;
> - chain->gso_type = VIRTIO_NET_HDR_GSO_TCPV4;
> + if (proto == (uint16_t)ETH_P_IP) {
> + chain->max_payload = VIRTIO_NET_MAX_IP4_PAYLOAD;
> + chain->gso_type = VIRTIO_NET_HDR_GSO_TCPV4;
> + } else {
> + chain->max_payload = VIRTIO_NET_MAX_IP6_PAYLOAD;
> + chain->gso_type = VIRTIO_NET_HDR_GSO_TCPV6;
> + }
> chain->drain_timer = timer_new_ns(QEMU_CLOCK_VIRTUAL,
> virtio_net_rsc_purge, chain);
> memset(&chain->stat, 0, sizeof(chain->stat));
> @@ -2158,7 +2290,11 @@ static ssize_t virtio_net_rsc_receive(NetClientState *nc,
> return virtio_net_do_receive(nc, buf, size);
> } else {
> chain->stat.received++;
> - return virtio_net_rsc_receive4(chain, nc, buf, size);
> + if (proto == (uint16_t)ETH_P_IP) {
> + return virtio_net_rsc_receive4(chain, nc, buf, size);
> + } else {
> + return virtio_net_rsc_receive6(chain, nc, buf, size);
> + }
> }
> }
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-05-30 4:25 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-05-28 16:37 [Qemu-devel] [ RFC Patch v6 0/2] Support Receive-Segment-Offload(RSC) for WHQL wexu
2016-05-28 16:37 ` [Qemu-devel] [ RFC Patch v6 1/3] virtio-net rsc: support coalescing ipv4 tcp traffic wexu
2016-05-30 4:20 ` Jason Wang
2016-06-02 16:16 ` Wei Xu
2016-05-28 16:37 ` [Qemu-devel] [ RFC Patch v6 2/3] virtio-net rsc: support coalescing ipv6 " wexu
2016-05-30 4:25 ` Jason Wang [this message]
2016-06-02 16:17 ` Wei Xu
2016-05-28 16:37 ` [Qemu-devel] [ RFC Patch v6 3/3] virtio-net rsc: add 2 new rsc information fields to 'virtio_net_hdr' wexu
2016-05-30 5:57 ` Jason Wang
2016-06-02 16:23 ` Wei Xu
2016-05-30 4:22 ` [Qemu-devel] [ RFC Patch v6 0/2] Support Receive-Segment-Offload(RSC) for WHQL Jason Wang
2016-05-30 4:50 ` Wei Xu
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=574BC09D.5050705@redhat.com \
--to=jasowang@redhat.com \
--cc=dfleytma@redhat.com \
--cc=marcel@redhat.com \
--cc=mst@redhat.com \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=victork@redhat.com \
--cc=wexu@redhat.com \
--cc=yvugenfi@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).