qemu-devel.nongnu.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com>
To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org
Cc: kwolf@redhat.com, Fam Zheng <famz@redhat.com>,
	Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com>,
	qemu-block@nongnu.org, Peter Lieven <pl@kamp.de>,
	mreitz@redhat.com, Ronnie Sahlberg <ronniesahlberg@gmail.com>,
	Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 5/5] block: Move request_alignment into BlockLimit
Date: Fri, 3 Jun 2016 11:49:35 -0600	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <5751C32F.3040806@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1464973388-15821-6-git-send-email-eblake@redhat.com>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1727 bytes --]

On 06/03/2016 11:03 AM, Eric Blake wrote:
> It makes more sense to have ALL block size limit constraints
> in the same struct.  Improve the documentation while at it.
> 
> Note that bdrv_refresh_limits() has to keep things alive across
> a memset() of BlockLimits.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com>
> ---
>  include/block/block_int.h | 12 ++++++++----
>  block.c                   |  4 ++--
>  block/blkdebug.c          |  4 ++--
>  block/bochs.c             |  2 +-
>  block/cloop.c             |  2 +-
>  block/dmg.c               |  2 +-
>  block/io.c                | 12 +++++++-----
>  block/iscsi.c             |  2 +-
>  block/raw-posix.c         | 16 ++++++++--------
>  block/raw-win32.c         |  6 +++---
>  block/vvfat.c             |  2 +-
>  11 files changed, 35 insertions(+), 29 deletions(-)

Something in this patch is causing qemu-iotests 77 to infloop; we may
decide it is just easier to drop this patch rather than find all the
places where the request_alignment must be preserved across what
otherwise zeroes out limits.

> +++ b/block/io.c
> @@ -71,8 +71,10 @@ void bdrv_refresh_limits(BlockDriverState *bs, Error **errp)
>  {
>      BlockDriver *drv = bs->drv;
>      Error *local_err = NULL;
> +    uint32_t request_alignment = bs->bl.request_alignment;
> 
>      memset(&bs->bl, 0, sizeof(bs->bl));
> +    bs->bl.request_alignment = request_alignment;

Or put another way, it looks like I missed another case where moving the
scope of the variable can impact who is expecting the value to remain
unchanged across certain operations.

-- 
Eric Blake   eblake redhat com    +1-919-301-3266
Libvirt virtualization library http://libvirt.org


[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 604 bytes --]

  reply	other threads:[~2016-06-03 17:49 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-06-03 17:03 [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 0/5] Byte-based block limits Eric Blake
2016-06-03 17:03 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 1/5] block: Tighter assertions on bdrv_aligned_preadv() Eric Blake
2016-06-07 12:15   ` Kevin Wolf
2016-06-03 17:03 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 2/5] block: Honor flags during bdrv_aligned_preadv() Eric Blake
2016-06-07 12:12   ` Kevin Wolf
2016-06-11 21:43     ` Eric Blake
2016-06-03 17:03 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 3/5] block: Switch transfer length bounds to byte-based Eric Blake
2016-06-07 12:45   ` Kevin Wolf
2016-06-11 22:06     ` Eric Blake
2016-06-14  8:20       ` Kevin Wolf
2016-06-03 17:03 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 4/5] block: Switch discard " Eric Blake
2016-06-07 13:12   ` Kevin Wolf
2016-06-03 17:03 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 5/5] block: Move request_alignment into BlockLimit Eric Blake
2016-06-03 17:49   ` Eric Blake [this message]
2016-06-03 21:43     ` Eric Blake
2016-06-07 10:08       ` Kevin Wolf
2016-06-07 11:04         ` Paolo Bonzini
2016-06-07 11:24           ` Kevin Wolf
2016-06-14  4:39         ` Eric Blake
2016-06-14  8:05           ` Kevin Wolf
2016-06-14 14:47             ` Eric Blake
2016-06-14 15:30               ` Kevin Wolf
2016-06-07 13:19   ` Kevin Wolf
2016-06-03 23:06 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 6/5] block: Fix harmless off-by-one in bdrv_aligned_preadv() Eric Blake
2016-06-07 13:47   ` Kevin Wolf
2016-06-03 23:13 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 7/5] block: Refactor zero_beyond_eof hack " Eric Blake
2016-06-07 13:49   ` Kevin Wolf

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=5751C32F.3040806@redhat.com \
    --to=eblake@redhat.com \
    --cc=famz@redhat.com \
    --cc=kwolf@redhat.com \
    --cc=mreitz@redhat.com \
    --cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
    --cc=pl@kamp.de \
    --cc=qemu-block@nongnu.org \
    --cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
    --cc=ronniesahlberg@gmail.com \
    --cc=stefanha@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).