From: Jason Wang <jasowang@redhat.com>
To: Aurelien Jarno <aurelien@aurel32.net>,
Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Cc: P J P <ppandit@redhat.com>,
Qemu Developers <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>,
Li Qiang <liqiang6-s@360.cn>,
Prasad J Pandit <pjp@fedoraproject.org>,
Leon Alrae <leon.alrae@imgtec.com>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] net: mipsnet: check transmit buffer size before sending
Date: Tue, 14 Jun 2016 11:48:05 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <575F7E75.2040805@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20160613083517.GB16232@aurel32.net>
On 2016年06月13日 16:35, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
> On 2016-06-02 10:28, Peter Maydell wrote:
>> On 2 June 2016 at 07:44, P J P <ppandit@redhat.com> wrote:
>>> From: Prasad J Pandit <pjp@fedoraproject.org>
>>>
>>> When processing MIPSnet I/O port write operation, it uses a
>>> transmit buffer tx_buffer[MAX_ETH_FRAME_SIZE=1514]. Two indices
>>> 's->tx_written' and 's->tx_count' are used to control data written
>>> to this buffer. If the two were to be equal before writing, it'd
>>> lead to an OOB write access beyond tx_buffer. Add check to avoid it.
>>>
>>> Reported-by: Li Qiang <liqiang6-s@360.cn>
>>> Signed-off-by: Prasad J Pandit <pjp@fedoraproject.org>
>>> ---
>>> hw/net/mipsnet.c | 10 ++++++----
>>> 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/hw/net/mipsnet.c b/hw/net/mipsnet.c
>>> index 740cd98..8d5e5bf 100644
>>> --- a/hw/net/mipsnet.c
>>> +++ b/hw/net/mipsnet.c
>>> @@ -158,7 +158,7 @@ static void mipsnet_ioport_write(void *opaque, hwaddr addr,
>>> trace_mipsnet_write(addr, val);
>>> switch (addr) {
>>> case MIPSNET_TX_DATA_COUNT:
>>> - s->tx_count = (val <= MAX_ETH_FRAME_SIZE) ? val : 0;
>>> + s->tx_count = (val < MAX_ETH_FRAME_SIZE) ? val : MAX_ETH_FRAME_SIZE;
>>> s->tx_written = 0;
>> This is a behaviour change -- the register will now read
>> back as MAX_ETH_FRAME_SIZE rather than 0 if written with
>> an overlarge value.
>>
>> Do we have any documentation on how this (simulated)
>> device is supposed to behave in this case?
> This device is not supported by the linux kernel for more than 2.5 years
> (since v3.7). Do we want to keep this device in QEMU?
>
> Aurelien
>
Right, so I suggest to remove this from qemu.
prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-06-14 3:48 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-06-02 6:44 [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] net: mipsnet: check transmit buffer size before sending P J P
2016-06-02 9:28 ` Peter Maydell
2016-06-02 19:45 ` P J P
2016-06-07 5:02 ` P J P
2016-06-08 6:38 ` Jason Wang
2016-06-08 7:47 ` P J P
2016-06-13 8:35 ` Aurelien Jarno
2016-06-14 3:48 ` Jason Wang [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=575F7E75.2040805@redhat.com \
--to=jasowang@redhat.com \
--cc=aurelien@aurel32.net \
--cc=leon.alrae@imgtec.com \
--cc=liqiang6-s@360.cn \
--cc=peter.maydell@linaro.org \
--cc=pjp@fedoraproject.org \
--cc=ppandit@redhat.com \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).