From: Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com>
To: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org, Fam Zheng <famz@redhat.com>,
Ronnie Sahlberg <ronniesahlberg@gmail.com>,
qemu-block@nongnu.org, Peter Lieven <pl@kamp.de>,
mreitz@redhat.com, Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com>,
Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 5/5] block: Move request_alignment into BlockLimit
Date: Mon, 13 Jun 2016 22:39:35 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <575F8A87.6000406@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20160607100810.GB4684@noname.str.redhat.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2007 bytes --]
On 06/07/2016 04:08 AM, Kevin Wolf wrote:
>> Found it; squash this in (or use it as an argument why we don't want
>> request_alignment in bs->bl after all):
>
> This hunk doesn't make sense to me. For the correctness of the code it
> shouldn't make a difference whether the alignment happens before passing
> the request to file/raw-posix or already in the raw format layer.
>
> The cause for the hang you're seeing is probably that the request is
> already aligned before the blkdebug layer and therefore the blkdebug
> events aren't generated any more. That's a problem with the test (I'm
> considering the blkdebug events part of the test infrastructure),
> however, and not with the code.
>
Yes, it's definitely a hang caused by the test expecting an unalignment
event, but the inheritance chain now causes things to be aligned to
begin with and nothing unaligned happens after all.
> Kevin
>
>> diff --git i/block/raw_bsd.c w/block/raw_bsd.c
>> index b1d5237..c3c2246 100644
>> --- i/block/raw_bsd.c
>> +++ w/block/raw_bsd.c
>> @@ -152,7 +152,11 @@ static int raw_get_info(BlockDriverState *bs,
>> BlockDriverInfo *bdi)
>>
>> static void raw_refresh_limits(BlockDriverState *bs, Error **errp)
>> {
>> + /* Inherit all limits except for request_alignment */
>> + int request_alignment = bs->bl.request_alignment;
>> +
>> bs->bl = bs->file->bs->bl;
>> + bs->bl.request_alignment = request_alignment;
Any ideas on how to fix the test, then? Have two blkdebug devices
nested atop one another, since those are the devices where we can
explicitly override alignment? (normally, you'd _expect_ the chain to
inherit the worst-case alignment of all BDS in the chain, so blkdebug is
the way around it).
That's the only thing left before I repost the series, so I may just
post the last patch as RFC and play with it a bit more...
--
Eric Blake eblake redhat com +1-919-301-3266
Libvirt virtualization library http://libvirt.org
[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 604 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-06-14 4:39 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-06-03 17:03 [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 0/5] Byte-based block limits Eric Blake
2016-06-03 17:03 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 1/5] block: Tighter assertions on bdrv_aligned_preadv() Eric Blake
2016-06-07 12:15 ` Kevin Wolf
2016-06-03 17:03 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 2/5] block: Honor flags during bdrv_aligned_preadv() Eric Blake
2016-06-07 12:12 ` Kevin Wolf
2016-06-11 21:43 ` Eric Blake
2016-06-03 17:03 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 3/5] block: Switch transfer length bounds to byte-based Eric Blake
2016-06-07 12:45 ` Kevin Wolf
2016-06-11 22:06 ` Eric Blake
2016-06-14 8:20 ` Kevin Wolf
2016-06-03 17:03 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 4/5] block: Switch discard " Eric Blake
2016-06-07 13:12 ` Kevin Wolf
2016-06-03 17:03 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 5/5] block: Move request_alignment into BlockLimit Eric Blake
2016-06-03 17:49 ` Eric Blake
2016-06-03 21:43 ` Eric Blake
2016-06-07 10:08 ` Kevin Wolf
2016-06-07 11:04 ` Paolo Bonzini
2016-06-07 11:24 ` Kevin Wolf
2016-06-14 4:39 ` Eric Blake [this message]
2016-06-14 8:05 ` Kevin Wolf
2016-06-14 14:47 ` Eric Blake
2016-06-14 15:30 ` Kevin Wolf
2016-06-07 13:19 ` Kevin Wolf
2016-06-03 23:06 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 6/5] block: Fix harmless off-by-one in bdrv_aligned_preadv() Eric Blake
2016-06-07 13:47 ` Kevin Wolf
2016-06-03 23:13 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 7/5] block: Refactor zero_beyond_eof hack " Eric Blake
2016-06-07 13:49 ` Kevin Wolf
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=575F8A87.6000406@redhat.com \
--to=eblake@redhat.com \
--cc=famz@redhat.com \
--cc=kwolf@redhat.com \
--cc=mreitz@redhat.com \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=pl@kamp.de \
--cc=qemu-block@nongnu.org \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=ronniesahlberg@gmail.com \
--cc=stefanha@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).