From: "Cédric Le Goater" <clg@kaod.org>
To: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
Cc: Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com>,
Peter Crosthwaite <crosthwaite.peter@gmail.com>,
Max Reitz <mreitz@redhat.com>,
qemu-block@nongnu.org, qemu-devel@nongnu.org
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] m25p80: fix test on blk_pread() return value
Date: Wed, 15 Jun 2016 15:36:05 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <576159C5.8060402@kaod.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20160615075704.GC4566@noname.redhat.com>
On 06/15/2016 09:57 AM, Kevin Wolf wrote:
> Am 14.06.2016 um 18:02 hat Cédric Le Goater geschrieben:
>> On 06/14/2016 10:38 AM, Kevin Wolf wrote:
>>> Am 14.06.2016 um 10:02 hat Cédric Le Goater geschrieben:
>>>>>> #4 0x00007fa81c6694ac in bdrv_aligned_pwritev (bs=0x7fa81d4dd050, req=<optimized out>, offset=30878208,
>>>>>> bytes=512, qiov=0x7fa7f47fee60, flags=0)
>>>>>> at /home/legoater/work/qemu/qemu-ast2400-mainline.git/block/io.c:1243
>>>>>> #5 0x00007fa81c669ecb in bdrv_co_pwritev (bs=0x7fa81d4dd050, offset=8, bytes=512, qiov=0x7fa80d5191c0,
>>>>>> flags=(BDRV_REQ_COPY_ON_READ | BDRV_REQ_ZERO_WRITE | BDRV_REQ_MAY_UNMAP | BDRV_REQ_NO_SERIALISING | BDRV_REQ_FUA | unknown: 4278124256), flags@entry=(unknown: 0))
>>>>>> at /home/legoater/work/qemu/qemu-ast2400-mainline.git/block/io.c:1492
>>>>>
>>>>> That 'flags' value looks bogus...
>>>>>
>>>>>> #6 0x00007fa81c65e367 in blk_co_pwritev (blk=0x7fa81d4c5b60, offset=30878208, bytes=256, qiov=0x7fa80d5191c0,
>>>>>> flags=(unknown: 0)) at /home/legoater/work/qemu/qemu-ast2400-mainline.git/block/block-backend.c:788
>>>>>> #7 0x00007fa81c65e49b in blk_aio_write_entry (opaque=0x7fa7e849aca0)
>>>>>> at /home/legoater/work/qemu/qemu-ast2400-mainline.git/block/block-backend.c:977
>>>>>> #8 0x00007fa81c6c823a in coroutine_trampoline (i0=<optimized out>, i1=<optimized out>)
>>>>>> at /home/legoater/work/qemu/qemu-ast2400-mainline.git/util/coroutine-ucontext.c:78
>>>>>> #9 0x00007fa818ea8f00 in ?? () from /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6
>>>>>
>>>>> and we don't get anything further in the backtrace beyond coroutines, to
>>>>> see who's sending the bad parameters. I recently debugged a bogus flags
>>>>> in bdrv_aio_preadv, by hoisting an assert to occur before coroutines are
>>>>> used in blk_aio_prwv():
>>>>>
>>>>> https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/2016-06/msg02948.html
>>>>>
>>>>> I've just posted v2 of that patch (now a 2/2 series), but in v2 no
>>>>> longer kept the assert at that point. But maybe the correct fix, and/or
>>>>> the hack for catching the bug prior to coroutines, will help you debug
>>>>> where the bad arguments are coming from.
>>>>
>>>> That does not fix the assert.
>>>>
>>>>>> #10 0x00007fa80d5189d0 in ?? ()
>>>>>> #11 0x0000000000000000 in ?? ()
>>>>>> (gdb) up 4
>>>>>> #4 0x00007fa81c6694ac in bdrv_aligned_pwritev (bs=0x7fa81d4dd050, req=<optimized out>, offset=30878208,
>>>>>> bytes=512, qiov=0x7fa7f47fee60, flags=0)
>>>>>> at /home/legoater/work/qemu/qemu-ast2400-mainline.git/block/io.c:1243
>>>>>> 1243 assert(!qiov || bytes == qiov->size);
>>>>>> (gdb) p *qiov
>>>>>> $1 = {iov = 0x7fa81da671d0, niov = 1, nalloc = 1, size = 256}
>>>>
>>>> So, it seems that the issue is coming from the fact that bdrv_co_pwritev()
>>>> does not handle alignments less than BDRV_SECTOR_SIZE :
>>>>
>>>> /* TODO Lift BDRV_SECTOR_SIZE restriction in BlockDriver interface */
>>>> uint64_t align = MAX(BDRV_SECTOR_SIZE, bs->request_alignment);
>>>>
>>>> It calls bdrv_aligned_pwritev() which does the assert :
>>>>
>>>> assert(!qiov || bytes == qiov->size);
>>>
>>> Yes, but between these two places, there is code that should actually
>>> enforce the right alignment:
>>>
>>> if ((offset + bytes) & (align - 1)) {
>>> ...
>>> }
>>>
>>> You can see in your backtrace that bdrv_aligned_pwritev() gets a
>>> different qiov than bdrv_co_pwritev() (which is local_qiov in the latter
>>> function).
>>>
>>> It's just unclear to me why this code extended bytes, but didn't add the
>>> tail_buf iovec to local_qiov.
>>
>> The gdb backtrace is bogus. It does not make sense. May be a gdb issue
>> with multithread on jessie.
>>
>> In the path tracking the tail bytes, we have :
>>
>> if ((offset + bytes) & (align - 1)) {
>> ...
> if (!use_local_qiov) {
> qemu_iovec_init(&local_qiov, qiov->niov + 1);
> qemu_iovec_concat(&local_qiov, qiov, 0, qiov->size);
> use_local_qiov = true;
> }
>> tail_bytes = (offset + bytes) & (align - 1);
>> qemu_iovec_add(&local_qiov, tail_buf + tail_bytes, align - tail_bytes);
>>
>> bytes = ROUND_UP(bytes, align);
>> }
>>
>> This is where the issue is I think. The qiov holds 256 and bytes 512.
>>
>> I have no idea how to fix that though.
>
> Added some more context above. qiov->size as passed from the device is
> already 256 bytes, which are added to local_qiov with
> qemu_iovec_concat(). And then we add another 256 from tail_buf in the
> lines that you quoted, so in theory we should end up with a properly
> aligned 256 + 256 = 512 byte qiov.
yes.
It seems that qiov is bogus after the bdrv_aligned_preadv() call. It gets
zeroed most of the time, sometime ->size is 1, and then qemu_iovec_concat()
constructs an awful local_qiov, which brings the assert in bdrv_aligned_pwritev()
How's that possible ? Could it be a serialization issue ?
C.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-06-15 13:36 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-05-31 11:36 [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] m25p80: fix test on blk_pread() return value Cédric Le Goater
2016-05-31 14:26 ` Eric Blake
2016-05-31 14:29 ` Cédric Le Goater
2016-05-31 14:36 ` Eric Blake
2016-06-13 16:25 ` Cédric Le Goater
2016-06-13 16:47 ` Eric Blake
2016-06-13 17:43 ` Cédric Le Goater
2016-06-13 18:56 ` Eric Blake
2016-06-14 8:02 ` Cédric Le Goater
2016-06-14 8:38 ` Kevin Wolf
2016-06-14 16:02 ` Cédric Le Goater
2016-06-15 7:57 ` Kevin Wolf
2016-06-15 13:36 ` Cédric Le Goater [this message]
2016-06-15 17:03 ` Cédric Le Goater
2016-06-14 8:54 ` Kevin Wolf
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=576159C5.8060402@kaod.org \
--to=clg@kaod.org \
--cc=crosthwaite.peter@gmail.com \
--cc=eblake@redhat.com \
--cc=kwolf@redhat.com \
--cc=mreitz@redhat.com \
--cc=qemu-block@nongnu.org \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).