From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:59407) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bDTgs-0002vZ-2T for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 16 Jun 2016 05:34:23 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bDTgm-0004zx-LN for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 16 Jun 2016 05:34:21 -0400 Received: from mailhub.sw.ru ([195.214.232.25]:24537 helo=relay.sw.ru) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bDTgm-0004zR-77 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 16 Jun 2016 05:34:16 -0400 References: <1466060287-31514-1-git-send-email-den@openvz.org> <1466060287-31514-3-git-send-email-den@openvz.org> From: Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy Message-ID: <5762728E.4090407@virtuozzo.com> Date: Thu, 16 Jun 2016 12:34:06 +0300 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <1466060287-31514-3-git-send-email-den@openvz.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 2/3] block: fix race in bdrv_co_discard with drive-mirror List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: "Denis V. Lunev" , qemu-devel@nongnu.org, qemu-block@nongnu.org Cc: Stefan Hajnoczi , Fam Zheng , Kevin Wolf , Max Reitz On 16.06.2016 09:58, Denis V. Lunev wrote: > Actually we must set dirty bitmap dirty after we have written all our > zeroes for correct processing in drive mirror code. In the other case > we can face not zeroes in this dirty area there in mirror_iteration. > > Signed-off-by: Denis V. Lunev > CC: Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy > CC: Stefan Hajnoczi > CC: Fam Zheng > CC: Kevin Wolf > CC: Max Reitz > --- > block/io.c | 3 ++- > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/block/io.c b/block/io.c > index b51f681..513bd99 100644 > --- a/block/io.c > +++ b/block/io.c > @@ -2265,7 +2265,6 @@ int coroutine_fn bdrv_co_discard(BlockDriverState *bs, int64_t sector_num, > > tracked_request_begin(&req, bs, NULL, sector_num << BDRV_SECTOR_BITS, > nb_sectors << BDRV_SECTOR_BITS, BDRV_TRACKED_DISCARD); > - bdrv_set_dirty(bs, sector_num, nb_sectors); > > max_discard = MIN_NON_ZERO(bs->bl.max_discard, BDRV_REQUEST_MAX_SECTORS); > while (nb_sectors > 0) { > @@ -2314,6 +2313,8 @@ int coroutine_fn bdrv_co_discard(BlockDriverState *bs, int64_t sector_num, > } > ret = 0; > out: > + bdrv_set_dirty(bs, req.offset << BDRV_SECTOR_BITS, s/<>/ > + req.bytes << BDRV_SECTOR_BITS); and here > tracked_request_end(&req); > return ret; > } -- Best regards, Vladimir