From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:40309) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bDVny-00022B-8N for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 16 Jun 2016 07:49:51 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bDVnu-0000KH-4O for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 16 Jun 2016 07:49:49 -0400 References: <1465520348-13964-1-git-send-email-bharata@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <20160610051414.GP9226@voom.fritz.box> <20160615060414.GG21472@voom.fritz.box> <20160616034952.GB7022@in.ibm.com> From: Thomas Huth Message-ID: <57629252.2090603@redhat.com> Date: Thu, 16 Jun 2016 13:49:38 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20160616034952.GB7022@in.ibm.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [Qemu-ppc] [PATCH v4 0/9] Core based CPU hotplug for PowerPC sPAPR List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: bharata@linux.vnet.ibm.com, David Gibson Cc: mjrosato@linux.vnet.ibm.com, pkrempa@redhat.com, ehabkost@redhat.com, qemu-devel@nongnu.org, borntraeger@de.ibm.com, qemu-ppc@nongnu.org, pbonzini@redhat.com, imammedo@redhat.com, eblake@redhat.com, mdroth@linux.vnet.ibm.com On 16.06.2016 05:49, Bharata B Rao wrote: > On Wed, Jun 15, 2016 at 04:04:14PM +1000, David Gibson wrote: >> On Fri, Jun 10, 2016 at 03:14:14PM +1000, David Gibson wrote: >>> On Fri, Jun 10, 2016 at 06:28:59AM +0530, Bharata B Rao wrote: >>>> Hi, >>>> >>>> This is the next version of the CPU hotplug patchset for PowerPC >>>> sPAPR target. The hotplug semantics looks like this: >>>> >>>> (qemu) device_add POWER8E-spapr-cpu-core,id=core2,core-id=16[,threads=4] >>>> (qemu) device_add host-spapr-cpu-core,id=core2,core-id=16[,threads=4] >>>> (qemu) device_add >>>> POWER8E_v2.1-spapr-cpu-core,id=core2,core-id=16[,threads=4] >>> >>> I've merged these to my ppc-cpu-hotplug branch, and I'm doing some >>> testing. It it checks out, I hope to send a pull request. >> >> I've now merged this into my main ppc-for-2.7 branch. I'll be doing >> some testing, obviously, but I'd certain appreciate any other tests of >> this branch with the hotplug code. > > David, I don't see the unplug patch in your tree, intentional ? > > Also I am working on supporting the CPU compat settings with the following > semantics: > > -cpu host,power7 -device host-spapr-cpu-core,compat-cpu=power7 I think the old syntax was something like: -cpu POWER8,compat=power7 So maybe keep that "compat=" prefix for both options? Thomas