From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:42762)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <serge.fdrv@gmail.com>) id 1bF13M-0000t6-8N
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 20 Jun 2016 11:23:58 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <serge.fdrv@gmail.com>) id 1bF13J-0006zn-Is
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 20 Jun 2016 11:23:56 -0400
Received: from mail-lf0-x243.google.com ([2a00:1450:4010:c07::243]:35187)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <serge.fdrv@gmail.com>) id 1bF13J-0006zM-B4
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 20 Jun 2016 11:23:53 -0400
Received: by mail-lf0-x243.google.com with SMTP id w130so5799685lfd.2
	for <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>; Mon, 20 Jun 2016 08:23:53 -0700 (PDT)
References: <1466181227-14934-1-git-send-email-alex.bennee@linaro.org>
	<72b6283d-998b-f2d7-9037-a3896c1c9423@redhat.com>
	<5767F5CA.2020200@gmail.com>
	<d485d1b7-de5f-251d-fec4-47c5195b180d@redhat.com>
From: Sergey Fedorov <serge.fdrv@gmail.com>
Message-ID: <57680A87.30407@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 20 Jun 2016 18:23:51 +0300
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <d485d1b7-de5f-251d-fec4-47c5195b180d@redhat.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [RFC 0/7] Safe watch and breakpoint manipulation
List-Id: <qemu-devel.nongnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/options/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/>
List-Post: <mailto:qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=subscribe>
To: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>, =?UTF-8?Q?Alex_Benn=c3=a9e?= <alex.bennee@linaro.org>, mttcg@greensocs.com, qemu-devel@nongnu.org, fred.konrad@greensocs.com, a.rigo@virtualopensystems.com, cota@braap.org, bobby.prani@gmail.com
Cc: peter.maydell@linaro.org, jan.kiszka@siemens.com, mark.burton@greensocs.com, claudio.fontana@huawei.com, rth@twiddle.net

On 20/06/16 17:25, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
>
> On 20/06/2016 15:55, Sergey Fedorov wrote:
>>>> I'm not sure why you say that arrays are more amenable than QTAILQ
>>>> (though indeed include/qemu/rcu_queue.h only includes QLIST for now),
>>>> but I feel bad asking you to redo all the work...
>> Is there any realistic way to manage *doubly* linked lists in RCU?
> Linux does that fine with circular linked list, but off the top of my
> head I cannot think of any reason why QTAILQ would not work.

Silly me, I see that now :)

Thanks,
Sergey