From: Peter Lieven <pl@kamp.de>
To: "Dr. David Alan Gilbert" <dgilbert@redhat.com>
Cc: "qemu-devel@nongnu.org" <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>,
Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] Qemu and heavily increased RSS usage
Date: Tue, 21 Jun 2016 17:12:57 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <57695979.2020102@kamp.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20160621131815.GB2264@work-vm>
Am 21.06.2016 um 15:18 schrieb Dr. David Alan Gilbert:
> * Peter Lieven (pl@kamp.de) wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> while upgrading from Qemu 2.2.0 to Qemu 2.5.1.1 I noticed that the RSS memory usage has heavily increased.
>> We use hugepages so the RSS memory does not include VM memory. In Qemu 2.2.0 it used to be ~30MB per vServer
>> and increased to up to 300 - 400MB for Qemu 2.5.1.1 (same with master). The memory increases over time, but seems
>> not to grow indefinetly. I tried to bisect, but had no result so far that made sense. I also tried valgrind / massif, but
>> valgrind does not see the allocation (at least at exit) and massif fails to rund due to - so it pretends - heap corruption.
>>
>> Any help or ideas how to debug further would be appreciated.
> I think I'd try stripping devices off; can you get a similar difference
> to happen with a guest with no USB, no hugepages, no VGA and a simple
> locally stored IDE disk?
Will do. VGA I already ruled out. Hugepages I can try, but its easier
to monitor the RSS size if the vServer memory is outside the RSS.
>
> If you're having trouble bisecting is it possible it's a change
> in one of the libraries it's linked against?
Same libraries. If I compile qemu-2.2.0 and qemu/master on the exactly
same machine I see the difference.
>
> There was someone asking the other day on #qemu who had a setup that
> was apparently using much more RAM than expected and we didn't
> manage to track it down but I can't remember the version being used.
What I currently suspect are the following changes:
- We changed the coroutine pool to a per thread model. I disabled the pool. This seems
to cut the max used RSS to about 150MB which is still a lot more than qemu-2.2.0
- I suspect that something (e.g. the object based device tree) is creating a lot of small allocations
which create a massive overhead. I managed to get valgrind/massif running with attached debugger
and took snapshots of the running VM. What I see is that kernel RSS size is much, much bigger than
what massif sees as allocated memory. I talk of massif sees 5MB heap usage and the RSS size is 50MB or similar.
- Changing the memory allocator to tcmalloc or jemalloc seems to relax the issue altough its not gone.
- VGA memory seems to have been moved from VM memory into Heap. But thats a fixed 16MB allocation.
I will try to cut down devices as you proposed.
Peter
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-06-21 15:13 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-06-21 8:21 [Qemu-devel] Qemu and heavily increased RSS usage Peter Lieven
2016-06-21 13:18 ` Dr. David Alan Gilbert
2016-06-21 15:12 ` Peter Lieven [this message]
2016-06-22 10:56 ` Stefan Hajnoczi
2016-06-22 19:55 ` Peter Lieven
2016-06-22 20:56 ` Peter Maydell
2016-06-24 9:37 ` Stefan Hajnoczi
2016-06-24 9:53 ` Peter Lieven
2016-06-24 9:57 ` Dr. David Alan Gilbert
2016-06-24 9:58 ` Peter Maydell
2016-06-24 10:45 ` Peter Lieven
2016-06-27 12:39 ` Stefan Hajnoczi
2016-06-27 13:33 ` Peter Lieven
2016-06-23 9:57 ` Peter Lieven
2016-06-24 22:57 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2016-06-23 14:58 ` Peter Lieven
2016-06-23 15:00 ` Dr. David Alan Gilbert
2016-06-23 15:02 ` Peter Lieven
2016-06-23 15:21 ` Paolo Bonzini
2016-06-23 15:31 ` Peter Lieven
2016-06-23 15:47 ` Paolo Bonzini
2016-06-23 16:19 ` Peter Lieven
2016-06-23 16:53 ` Paolo Bonzini
2016-06-23 21:28 ` Peter Lieven
2016-06-24 4:10 ` Paolo Bonzini
2016-06-24 8:11 ` Peter Lieven
2016-06-24 8:20 ` Paolo Bonzini
2016-06-24 8:45 ` Peter Lieven
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=57695979.2020102@kamp.de \
--to=pl@kamp.de \
--cc=dgilbert@redhat.com \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).