From: Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com>
To: Fam Zheng <famz@redhat.com>
Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org, qemu-block@nongnu.org, kwolf@redhat.com,
stefanha@redhat.com, Max Reitz <mreitz@redhat.com>,
Ronnie Sahlberg <ronniesahlberg@gmail.com>,
Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>, Peter Lieven <pl@kamp.de>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v3 17/22] block: Switch discard length bounds to byte-based
Date: Fri, 24 Jun 2016 08:15:53 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <576D4099.2020108@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20160624064310.GC13266@ad.usersys.redhat.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2388 bytes --]
On 06/24/2016 12:43 AM, Fam Zheng wrote:
> On Thu, 06/23 16:37, Eric Blake wrote:
>> Sector-based limits are awkward to think about; in our on-going
>> quest to move to byte-based interfaces, convert max_discard and
>> discard_alignment. Rename them, using 'pdiscard' as an aid to
>> track which remaining discard interfaces need conversion, and so
>> that the compiler will help us catch the change in semantics
>> across any rebased code. The BlockLimits type is now completely
>> byte-based; and in iscsi.c, sector_limits_lun2qemu() is no
>> longer needed.
>>
>> pdiscard_alignment is made unsigned (we use power-of-2 alignments
>> as bitmasks, where unsigned is easier to think about) while
>> leaving max_pdiscard signed (since we still have an 'int'
>> interface); this is comparable to what commit cf081fc did for
>> write zeroes limits. We may later want to make everything an
>> unsigned 64-bit limit - but that requires a bigger code audit.
>>
>> - /* optimal alignment for discard requests in sectors */
>> - int64_t discard_alignment;
>> + /* optimal alignment for discard requests in bytes, must be power
>> + * of 2, less than max_discard if that is set, and multiple of
>
> s/max_discard/max_pdiscard/
Maintainer could touch it up on pull request.
>> /* align request */
>> - if (bs->bl.discard_alignment &&
>> - num >= bs->bl.discard_alignment &&
>> - sector_num % bs->bl.discard_alignment) {
>> - if (num > bs->bl.discard_alignment) {
>> - num = bs->bl.discard_alignment;
>> + if (discard_alignment &&
>> + num >= discard_alignment &&
>> + sector_num % discard_alignment) {
>> + if (num > discard_alignment) {
>> + num = discard_alignment;
>> }
>> - num -= sector_num % bs->bl.discard_alignment;
>> + num -= sector_num % discard_alignment;
>
> Or just
>
> num = discard_alignment - sector_num % discard_alignment;
>
> without the if.
>
Sure. It all gets simplified later when I switch to bdrv_co_pdiscard().
Up to the maintainer.
> Otherwise looks good,
>
> Reviewed-by: Fam Zheng <famz@redhat.com>
>
--
Eric Blake eblake redhat com +1-919-301-3266
Libvirt virtualization library http://libvirt.org
[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 604 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-06-24 14:16 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 40+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-06-23 22:37 [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v3 00/22] Byte-based block limits Eric Blake
2016-06-23 22:37 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v3 01/22] block: Tighter assertions on bdrv_aligned_pwritev() Eric Blake
2016-06-23 22:37 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v3 02/22] block: Document supported flags during bdrv_aligned_preadv() Eric Blake
2016-06-23 22:37 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v3 03/22] block: Fix harmless off-by-one in bdrv_aligned_preadv() Eric Blake
2016-06-23 22:37 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v3 04/22] nbd: Allow larger requests Eric Blake
2016-06-23 22:37 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v3 05/22] nbd: Advertise realistic limits to block layer Eric Blake
2016-06-23 22:37 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v3 06/22] iscsi: " Eric Blake
2016-06-23 22:37 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v3 07/22] scsi: Advertise limits by blocksize, not 512 Eric Blake
2016-06-24 5:22 ` Fam Zheng
2016-06-23 22:37 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v3 08/22] block: Give nonzero result to blk_get_max_transfer_length() Eric Blake
2016-06-24 5:24 ` Fam Zheng
2016-06-23 22:37 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v3 09/22] blkdebug: Set request_alignment during .bdrv_refresh_limits() Eric Blake
2016-06-24 5:42 ` Fam Zheng
2016-06-23 22:37 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v3 10/22] iscsi: " Eric Blake
2016-06-23 22:37 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v3 11/22] qcow2: " Eric Blake
2016-06-23 22:37 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v3 12/22] raw-win32: " Eric Blake
2016-06-23 22:37 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v3 13/22] block: " Eric Blake
2016-06-23 22:37 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v3 14/22] block: Set default request_alignment during bdrv_refresh_limits() Eric Blake
2016-06-23 22:37 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v3 15/22] block: Switch transfer length bounds to byte-based Eric Blake
2016-06-24 6:06 ` Fam Zheng
2016-06-23 22:37 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v3 16/22] block: Wording tweaks to write zeroes limits Eric Blake
2016-06-24 6:12 ` Fam Zheng
2016-06-24 14:10 ` Eric Blake
2016-06-23 22:37 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v3 17/22] block: Switch discard length bounds to byte-based Eric Blake
2016-06-24 6:43 ` Fam Zheng
2016-06-24 14:15 ` Eric Blake [this message]
2016-06-24 14:29 ` Kevin Wolf
2016-06-23 22:37 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v3 18/22] block: Drop raw_refresh_limits() Eric Blake
2016-06-24 6:44 ` Fam Zheng
2016-06-23 22:37 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v3 19/22] block: Split bdrv_merge_limits() from bdrv_refresh_limits() Eric Blake
2016-06-24 6:48 ` Fam Zheng
2016-06-23 22:37 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v3 20/22] block: Move request_alignment into BlockLimit Eric Blake
2016-06-24 7:07 ` Fam Zheng
2016-06-24 13:45 ` Kevin Wolf
2016-06-24 14:17 ` Eric Blake
2016-06-23 22:37 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v3 21/22] block: Fix error message style Eric Blake
2016-06-24 7:09 ` Fam Zheng
2016-06-23 22:37 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v3 22/22] block: Use bool as appropriate for BDS members Eric Blake
2016-06-24 7:12 ` Fam Zheng
2016-06-24 14:32 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v3 00/22] Byte-based block limits Kevin Wolf
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=576D4099.2020108@redhat.com \
--to=eblake@redhat.com \
--cc=famz@redhat.com \
--cc=kwolf@redhat.com \
--cc=mreitz@redhat.com \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=pl@kamp.de \
--cc=qemu-block@nongnu.org \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=ronniesahlberg@gmail.com \
--cc=stefanha@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).