From: Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy <vsementsov@virtuozzo.com>
To: Fam Zheng <famz@redhat.com>, qemu-devel@nongnu.org
Cc: kwolf@redhat.com, jsnow@redhat.com, qemu-block@nongnu.org,
mreitz@redhat.com
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v5 01/10] block: Hide HBitmap in block dirty bitmap interface
Date: Tue, 28 Jun 2016 18:39:29 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <57729A31.1060907@virtuozzo.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5772999A.4030603@virtuozzo.com>
On 28.06.2016 18:36, Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy wrote:
> On 03.06.2016 07:32, Fam Zheng wrote:
>> HBitmap is an implementation detail of block dirty bitmap that should
>> be hidden
>> from users. Introduce a BdrvDirtyBitmapIter to encapsulate the
>> underlying
>> HBitmapIter.
>>
>> A small difference in the interface is, before, an HBitmapIter is
>> initialized
>> in place, now the new BdrvDirtyBitmapIter must be dynamically
>> allocated because
>> the structure definition is in block/dirty-bitmap.c.
>>
>> Two current users are converted too.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Fam Zheng <famz@redhat.com>
>> ---
>> block/backup.c | 14 ++++++++------
>> block/dirty-bitmap.c | 39
>> +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------
>> block/mirror.c | 24 +++++++++++++-----------
>> include/block/dirty-bitmap.h | 7 +++++--
>> include/qemu/typedefs.h | 1 +
>> 5 files changed, 60 insertions(+), 25 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/block/backup.c b/block/backup.c
>> index feeb9f8..ac7ca45 100644
>> --- a/block/backup.c
>> +++ b/block/backup.c
>> @@ -317,14 +317,14 @@ static int coroutine_fn
>> backup_run_incremental(BackupBlockJob *job)
>> int64_t end;
>> int64_t last_cluster = -1;
>> int64_t sectors_per_cluster = cluster_size_sectors(job);
>> - HBitmapIter hbi;
>> + BdrvDirtyBitmapIter *dbi;
>> granularity = bdrv_dirty_bitmap_granularity(job->sync_bitmap);
>> clusters_per_iter = MAX((granularity / job->cluster_size), 1);
>> - bdrv_dirty_iter_init(job->sync_bitmap, &hbi);
>> + dbi = bdrv_dirty_iter_new(job->sync_bitmap, 0);
>> /* Find the next dirty sector(s) */
>> - while ((sector = hbitmap_iter_next(&hbi)) != -1) {
>> + while ((sector = bdrv_dirty_iter_next(dbi)) != -1) {
>> cluster = sector / sectors_per_cluster;
>> /* Fake progress updates for any clusters we skipped */
>> @@ -336,7 +336,7 @@ static int coroutine_fn
>> backup_run_incremental(BackupBlockJob *job)
>> for (end = cluster + clusters_per_iter; cluster < end;
>> cluster++) {
>> do {
>> if (yield_and_check(job)) {
>> - return ret;
>> + goto out;
>> }
>> ret = backup_do_cow(job, cluster *
>> sectors_per_cluster,
>> sectors_per_cluster,
>> &error_is_read,
>> @@ -344,7 +344,7 @@ static int coroutine_fn
>> backup_run_incremental(BackupBlockJob *job)
>> if ((ret < 0) &&
>> backup_error_action(job, error_is_read, -ret) ==
>> BLOCK_ERROR_ACTION_REPORT) {
>> - return ret;
>> + goto out;
>> }
>> } while (ret < 0);
>> }
>> @@ -352,7 +352,7 @@ static int coroutine_fn
>> backup_run_incremental(BackupBlockJob *job)
>> /* If the bitmap granularity is smaller than the backup
>> granularity,
>> * we need to advance the iterator pointer to the next
>> cluster. */
>> if (granularity < job->cluster_size) {
>> - bdrv_set_dirty_iter(&hbi, cluster * sectors_per_cluster);
>> + bdrv_set_dirty_iter(dbi, cluster * sectors_per_cluster);
>> }
>> last_cluster = cluster - 1;
>> @@ -364,6 +364,8 @@ static int coroutine_fn
>> backup_run_incremental(BackupBlockJob *job)
>> job->common.offset += ((end - last_cluster - 1) *
>> job->cluster_size);
>> }
>> +out:
>> + bdrv_dirty_iter_free(dbi);
>> return ret;
>> }
>> diff --git a/block/dirty-bitmap.c b/block/dirty-bitmap.c
>> index 4902ca5..ec073ee 100644
>> --- a/block/dirty-bitmap.c
>> +++ b/block/dirty-bitmap.c
>> @@ -42,9 +42,15 @@ struct BdrvDirtyBitmap {
>> char *name; /* Optional non-empty unique ID */
>> int64_t size; /* Size of the bitmap (Number of
>> sectors) */
>> bool disabled; /* Bitmap is read-only */
>> + int active_iterators; /* How many iterators are active */
>> QLIST_ENTRY(BdrvDirtyBitmap) list;
>> };
>> +struct BdrvDirtyBitmapIter {
>> + HBitmapIter hbi;
>> + BdrvDirtyBitmap *bitmap;
>> +};
>> +
>> BdrvDirtyBitmap *bdrv_find_dirty_bitmap(BlockDriverState *bs, const
>> char *name)
>> {
>> BdrvDirtyBitmap *bm;
>> @@ -212,6 +218,7 @@ void bdrv_dirty_bitmap_truncate(BlockDriverState
>> *bs)
>> QLIST_FOREACH(bitmap, &bs->dirty_bitmaps, list) {
>> assert(!bdrv_dirty_bitmap_frozen(bitmap));
>> + assert(!bitmap->active_iterators);
>> hbitmap_truncate(bitmap->bitmap, size);
>> bitmap->size = size;
>> }
>> @@ -224,6 +231,7 @@ static void
>> bdrv_do_release_matching_dirty_bitmap(BlockDriverState *bs,
>> BdrvDirtyBitmap *bm, *next;
>> QLIST_FOREACH_SAFE(bm, &bs->dirty_bitmaps, list, next) {
>> if ((!bitmap || bm == bitmap) && (!only_named || bm->name)) {
>> + assert(!bitmap->active_iterators);
>> assert(!bdrv_dirty_bitmap_frozen(bm));
>> QLIST_REMOVE(bm, list);
>> hbitmap_free(bm->bitmap);
>> @@ -320,9 +328,29 @@ uint32_t
>> bdrv_dirty_bitmap_granularity(BdrvDirtyBitmap *bitmap)
>> return BDRV_SECTOR_SIZE << hbitmap_granularity(bitmap->bitmap);
>> }
>> -void bdrv_dirty_iter_init(BdrvDirtyBitmap *bitmap, HBitmapIter *hbi)
>> +BdrvDirtyBitmapIter *bdrv_dirty_iter_new(BdrvDirtyBitmap *bitmap,
>> + uint64_t first_sector)
>
> can you use const BdrvDirtyBitmap * pointer ? To allow iterating
> through const bitmap, in store_to_file function foe ex.
I see, no, because of 'bitmap->active_iterators++'...
>
>> {
>> - hbitmap_iter_init(hbi, bitmap->bitmap, 0);
>> + BdrvDirtyBitmapIter *iter = g_new(BdrvDirtyBitmapIter, 1);
>> + hbitmap_iter_init(&iter->hbi, bitmap->bitmap, first_sector);
>> + iter->bitmap = bitmap;
>> + bitmap->active_iterators++;
>> + return iter;
>> +}
>> +
>> +void bdrv_dirty_iter_free(BdrvDirtyBitmapIter *iter)
>> +{
>> + if (!iter) {
>> + return;
>> + }
>> + assert(iter->bitmap->active_iterators > 0);
>> + iter->bitmap->active_iterators--;
>> + g_free(iter);
>> +}
>> +
>> +int64_t bdrv_dirty_iter_next(BdrvDirtyBitmapIter *iter)
>> +{
>> + return hbitmap_iter_next(&iter->hbi);
>> }
>> void bdrv_set_dirty_bitmap(BdrvDirtyBitmap *bitmap,
>> @@ -373,12 +401,11 @@ void bdrv_set_dirty(BlockDriverState *bs,
>> int64_t cur_sector,
>> }
>> /**
>> - * Advance an HBitmapIter to an arbitrary offset.
>> + * Advance a BdrvDirtyBitmapIter to an arbitrary offset.
>> */
>> -void bdrv_set_dirty_iter(HBitmapIter *hbi, int64_t offset)
>> +void bdrv_set_dirty_iter(BdrvDirtyBitmapIter *iter, int64_t sector_num)
>> {
>> - assert(hbi->hb);
>> - hbitmap_iter_init(hbi, hbi->hb, offset);
>> + hbitmap_iter_init(&iter->hbi, iter->hbi.hb, sector_num);
>> }
>> int64_t bdrv_get_dirty_count(BdrvDirtyBitmap *bitmap)
>> diff --git a/block/mirror.c b/block/mirror.c
>> index 80fd3c7..1d90aa5 100644
>> --- a/block/mirror.c
>> +++ b/block/mirror.c
>> @@ -52,7 +52,7 @@ typedef struct MirrorBlockJob {
>> int64_t bdev_length;
>> unsigned long *cow_bitmap;
>> BdrvDirtyBitmap *dirty_bitmap;
>> - HBitmapIter hbi;
>> + BdrvDirtyBitmapIter *dbi;
>> uint8_t *buf;
>> QSIMPLEQ_HEAD(, MirrorBuffer) buf_free;
>> int buf_free_count;
>> @@ -317,10 +317,10 @@ static uint64_t coroutine_fn
>> mirror_iteration(MirrorBlockJob *s)
>> int64_t end = s->bdev_length / BDRV_SECTOR_SIZE;
>> int sectors_per_chunk = s->granularity >> BDRV_SECTOR_BITS;
>> - sector_num = hbitmap_iter_next(&s->hbi);
>> + sector_num = bdrv_dirty_iter_next(s->dbi);
>> if (sector_num < 0) {
>> - bdrv_dirty_iter_init(s->dirty_bitmap, &s->hbi);
>> - sector_num = hbitmap_iter_next(&s->hbi);
>> + bdrv_set_dirty_iter(s->dbi, 0);
>> + sector_num = bdrv_dirty_iter_next(s->dbi);
>> trace_mirror_restart_iter(s,
>> bdrv_get_dirty_count(s->dirty_bitmap));
>> assert(sector_num >= 0);
>> }
>> @@ -334,7 +334,7 @@ static uint64_t coroutine_fn
>> mirror_iteration(MirrorBlockJob *s)
>> /* Find the number of consective dirty chunks following the
>> first dirty
>> * one, and wait for in flight requests in them. */
>> while (nb_chunks * sectors_per_chunk < (s->buf_size >>
>> BDRV_SECTOR_BITS)) {
>> - int64_t hbitmap_next;
>> + int64_t next_dirty;
>> int64_t next_sector = sector_num + nb_chunks *
>> sectors_per_chunk;
>> int64_t next_chunk = next_sector / sectors_per_chunk;
>> if (next_sector >= end ||
>> @@ -345,13 +345,13 @@ static uint64_t coroutine_fn
>> mirror_iteration(MirrorBlockJob *s)
>> break;
>> }
>> - hbitmap_next = hbitmap_iter_next(&s->hbi);
>> - if (hbitmap_next > next_sector || hbitmap_next < 0) {
>> + next_dirty = bdrv_dirty_iter_next(s->dbi);
>> + if (next_dirty > next_sector || next_dirty < 0) {
>> /* The bitmap iterator's cache is stale, refresh it */
>> - bdrv_set_dirty_iter(&s->hbi, next_sector);
>> - hbitmap_next = hbitmap_iter_next(&s->hbi);
>> + bdrv_set_dirty_iter(s->dbi, next_sector);
>> + next_dirty = bdrv_dirty_iter_next(s->dbi);
>> }
>> - assert(hbitmap_next == next_sector);
>> + assert(next_dirty == next_sector);
>> nb_chunks++;
>> }
>> @@ -601,7 +601,8 @@ static void coroutine_fn mirror_run(void *opaque)
>> }
>> }
>> - bdrv_dirty_iter_init(s->dirty_bitmap, &s->hbi);
>> + assert(!s->dbi);
>> + s->dbi = bdrv_dirty_iter_new(s->dirty_bitmap, 0);
>> for (;;) {
>> uint64_t delay_ns = 0;
>> int64_t cnt;
>> @@ -712,6 +713,7 @@ immediate_exit:
>> qemu_vfree(s->buf);
>> g_free(s->cow_bitmap);
>> g_free(s->in_flight_bitmap);
>> + bdrv_dirty_iter_free(s->dbi);
>> bdrv_release_dirty_bitmap(bs, s->dirty_bitmap);
>> data = g_malloc(sizeof(*data));
>> diff --git a/include/block/dirty-bitmap.h b/include/block/dirty-bitmap.h
>> index 80afe60..2ea601b 100644
>> --- a/include/block/dirty-bitmap.h
>> +++ b/include/block/dirty-bitmap.h
>> @@ -36,8 +36,11 @@ void bdrv_set_dirty_bitmap(BdrvDirtyBitmap *bitmap,
>> int64_t cur_sector, int nr_sectors);
>> void bdrv_reset_dirty_bitmap(BdrvDirtyBitmap *bitmap,
>> int64_t cur_sector, int nr_sectors);
>> -void bdrv_dirty_iter_init(BdrvDirtyBitmap *bitmap, struct
>> HBitmapIter *hbi);
>> -void bdrv_set_dirty_iter(struct HBitmapIter *hbi, int64_t offset);
>> +BdrvDirtyBitmapIter *bdrv_dirty_iter_new(BdrvDirtyBitmap *bitmap,
>> + uint64_t first_sector);
>> +void bdrv_dirty_iter_free(BdrvDirtyBitmapIter *iter);
>> +int64_t bdrv_dirty_iter_next(BdrvDirtyBitmapIter *iter);
>> +void bdrv_set_dirty_iter(BdrvDirtyBitmapIter *hbi, int64_t sector_num);
>> int64_t bdrv_get_dirty_count(BdrvDirtyBitmap *bitmap);
>> void bdrv_dirty_bitmap_truncate(BlockDriverState *bs);
>> diff --git a/include/qemu/typedefs.h b/include/qemu/typedefs.h
>> index b113fcf..1b8c30a 100644
>> --- a/include/qemu/typedefs.h
>> +++ b/include/qemu/typedefs.h
>> @@ -11,6 +11,7 @@ typedef struct AioContext AioContext;
>> typedef struct AllwinnerAHCIState AllwinnerAHCIState;
>> typedef struct AudioState AudioState;
>> typedef struct BdrvDirtyBitmap BdrvDirtyBitmap;
>> +typedef struct BdrvDirtyBitmapIter BdrvDirtyBitmapIter;
>> typedef struct BlockBackend BlockBackend;
>> typedef struct BlockBackendRootState BlockBackendRootState;
>> typedef struct BlockDriverState BlockDriverState;
>
>
--
Best regards,
Vladimir
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-06-28 15:39 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 31+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-06-03 4:32 [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v5 00/10] Dirty bitmap changes for migration/persistence work Fam Zheng
2016-06-03 4:32 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v5 01/10] block: Hide HBitmap in block dirty bitmap interface Fam Zheng
2016-06-22 15:10 ` Max Reitz
2016-06-28 15:36 ` Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy
2016-06-28 15:39 ` Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy [this message]
2016-07-12 22:49 ` John Snow
2016-07-13 7:57 ` Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy
2016-07-13 10:10 ` Max Reitz
2016-06-03 4:32 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v5 02/10] HBitmap: Introduce "meta" bitmap to track bit changes Fam Zheng
2016-06-22 15:22 ` Max Reitz
2016-07-13 17:39 ` John Snow
2016-06-03 4:32 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v5 03/10] tests: Add test code for meta bitmap Fam Zheng
2016-06-22 15:30 ` Max Reitz
2016-06-03 4:32 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v5 04/10] block: Support meta dirty bitmap Fam Zheng
2016-06-22 15:53 ` Max Reitz
2016-07-14 20:00 ` John Snow
2016-07-15 12:04 ` Max Reitz
2016-07-15 12:10 ` Max Reitz
2016-07-18 6:59 ` Fam Zheng
2016-07-15 18:02 ` John Snow
2016-06-03 4:32 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v5 05/10] block: Add two dirty bitmap getters Fam Zheng
2016-06-22 16:02 ` Max Reitz
2016-06-03 4:32 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v5 06/10] block: Assert that bdrv_release_dirty_bitmap succeeded Fam Zheng
2016-06-22 16:08 ` Max Reitz
2016-06-03 4:32 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v5 07/10] hbitmap: serialization Fam Zheng
2016-06-28 14:15 ` Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy
2016-07-14 20:45 ` John Snow
2016-06-03 4:33 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v5 08/10] block: BdrvDirtyBitmap serialization interface Fam Zheng
2016-06-03 4:33 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v5 09/10] tests: Add test code for hbitmap serialization Fam Zheng
2016-06-03 4:33 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v5 10/10] block: More operations for meta dirty bitmap Fam Zheng
2016-06-03 8:53 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v5 00/10] Dirty bitmap changes for migration/persistence work Fam Zheng
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=57729A31.1060907@virtuozzo.com \
--to=vsementsov@virtuozzo.com \
--cc=famz@redhat.com \
--cc=jsnow@redhat.com \
--cc=kwolf@redhat.com \
--cc=mreitz@redhat.com \
--cc=qemu-block@nongnu.org \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).