From: Sergey Fedorov <sergey.fedorov@linaro.org>
To: "Стас Шмаров" <snarpix@gmail.com>
Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org, Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
Peter Crosthwaite <crosthwaite.peter@gmail.com>,
Richard Henderson <rth@twiddle.net>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2] translate-all: Bugfix for user-mode self-modifying code in 2 page long TB
Date: Wed, 6 Jul 2016 15:53:52 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <577CFF60.5030805@linaro.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CACVv8pMny6VvTXLS3BeaGoe2gPTD7JmrQUsCWEw+Q8fkVw9K-A@mail.gmail.com>
On 06/07/16 15:01, Стас Шмаров wrote:
> May be this can be done faster.
> After invalidation of current TB, we know next executed TB will be 1
> instruction long and will write to same address, and will cause
> segfault. In sigfault handler write protection to this page will be
> disabled.
> So, we can retranslate TB, and remove protection before execution of
> new TB. It will be one signal less.
You mean not to return 2 immediately but rather to remember the desired
return value and keep invalidating guest pages, then go ahead and call
mprotect() to enable writes to the host page?
Thanks,
Sergey
>
> 2016-07-06 13:21 GMT+03:00 Sergey Fedorov <sergey.fedorov@linaro.org
> <mailto:sergey.fedorov@linaro.org>>:
>
> On 06/07/16 10:54, Stanislav Shmarov wrote:
> > In user-mode emulation Translation Block can consist of 2 guest
> pages.
> > In that case QEMU also mprotects 2 host pages that are dedicated for
> > guest memory, containing instructions. QEMU detects
> self-modifying code
> > with SEGFAULT signal processing.
> >
> > In case if instruction in 1st page is modifying memory of 2nd
> > page (or vice versa) QEMU will mark 2nd page with PAGE_WRITE,
> > invalidate TB, generate new TB contatining 1 guest instruction and
> > exit to CPU loop. QEMU won't call mprotect, and new TB will cause
> > same SEGFAULT. Page will have both PAGE_WRITE_ORG and PAGE_WRITE
> > flags, so QEMU will handle the signal as guest binary problem,
> > and exit with guest SEGFAULT.
> >
> > Solution is retranslate TB before marking pages as PAGE_WRITE,
> > and remove protection with mprotect on second SEGFAULT.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Stanislav Shmarov <snarpix@gmail.com
> <mailto:snarpix@gmail.com>>
>
> Reviewed-by: Sergey Fedorov <sergey.fedorov@linaro.org
> <mailto:sergey.fedorov@linaro.org>>
>
> > ---
> > v2: Moved setting PAGE_WRITE flag to separte loop, to cover cases,
> > pointed by Sergey Fedorov.
> >
> > translate-all.c | 17 +++++++++++------
> > 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/translate-all.c b/translate-all.c
> > index eaa95e4..fb3743f 100644
> > --- a/translate-all.c
> > +++ b/translate-all.c
> > @@ -2020,13 +2020,8 @@ int page_unprotect(target_ulong address,
> uintptr_t pc)
> > host_start = address & qemu_host_page_mask;
> > host_end = host_start + qemu_host_page_size;
> >
> > - prot = 0;
> > for (addr = host_start ; addr < host_end ; addr +=
> TARGET_PAGE_SIZE) {
> > - p = page_find(addr >> TARGET_PAGE_BITS);
> > - p->flags |= PAGE_WRITE;
> > - prot |= p->flags;
> > -
> > - /* and since the content will be modified, we must
> invalidate
> > + /* Since the content will be modified, we must
> invalidate
> > the corresponding translated code. */
> > if (tb_invalidate_phys_page(addr, pc)) {
> > mmap_unlock();
> > @@ -2036,6 +2031,16 @@ int page_unprotect(target_ulong address,
> uintptr_t pc)
> > tb_invalidate_check(addr);
> > #endif
> > }
> > +
> > + /* If we got here, current TB have been retranslated
> (in case of
> > + * self-modifying code), now it's safe to remove page
> protection.
> > + */
> > + prot = 0;
> > + for (addr = host_start ; addr < host_end ; addr +=
> TARGET_PAGE_SIZE) {
> > + p = page_find(addr >> TARGET_PAGE_BITS);
> > + p->flags |= PAGE_WRITE;
> > + prot |= p->flags;
> > + }
> > mprotect((void *)g2h(host_start), qemu_host_page_size,
> > prot & PAGE_BITS);
> >
>
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-07-06 12:54 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-07-06 7:54 [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2] translate-all: Bugfix for user-mode self-modifying code in 2 page long TB Stanislav Shmarov
2016-07-06 10:21 ` Sergey Fedorov
2016-07-06 12:01 ` Стас Шмаров
2016-07-06 12:53 ` Sergey Fedorov [this message]
2016-07-06 13:22 ` Stanislav Shmarov
2016-07-06 13:22 ` Sergey Fedorov
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=577CFF60.5030805@linaro.org \
--to=sergey.fedorov@linaro.org \
--cc=crosthwaite.peter@gmail.com \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=rth@twiddle.net \
--cc=snarpix@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).