From: Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com>
To: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org, qemu-block@nongnu.org,
Max Reitz <mreitz@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 3/5] raw_bsd: Don't advertise flags not supported by protocol layer
Date: Fri, 8 Jul 2016 08:32:14 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <577FB96E.80607@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20160708110519.GK14684@noname.redhat.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1981 bytes --]
On 07/08/2016 05:05 AM, Kevin Wolf wrote:
> Am 21.06.2016 um 01:39 hat Eric Blake geschrieben:
>> The raw format layer supports all flags via passthrough - but
>> it only makes sense to pass through flags that the lower layer
>> actually supports.
>>
>> Thanks to the previous patch, the raw format layer now attempts
>> to fragment writes at the max_transfer limit it inherits from
>> the NBD protocol layer, recently set to 32m. An attempt to do
>> 'w -f 0 40m' to an NBD server that lacks FUA thus changed from
>> flushing once (after NBD fragmented a single 40m write itself)
>> to instead flushing twice (the format layer sees BDRV_REQ_FUA
>> in supported_write_flags, so it sends the flag on to both
>> fragments, and then the block layer emulates FUA by flushing
>> for both the 32m and 8m fragments at the protocol layer).
>> This patch fixes the performance regression (now that the
>> format layer no longer advertises a flag not present at the
>> protocol layer, the flush to emulate FUA is deferred to the
>> last fragment).
>>
>> Note that 'w -f -z 0 40m' does not currently exhibit the same
>> problem, because there, the fragmentation does not occur until
>> at the NBD layer (the raw layer has .bdrv_co_pwrite_zeroes, and
>> the NBD layer doesn't advertise max_pwrite_zeroes to constrain
>> things at the raw layer) - but that problem is latent and would
>> have the same problem with too many flushes without this patch
>> once the NBD layer implements support for using the new
>> NBD_CMD_WRITE_ZEROES and sets max_pwrite_zeroes to the same 32m
>> limit as recommended by the NBD protocol.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com>
>
> Should this be moved before patch 2 so that we never get a regression in
> the first place?
Can do, although it will require some word-smithing to the commit message.
--
Eric Blake eblake redhat com +1-919-301-3266
Libvirt virtualization library http://libvirt.org
[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 604 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-07-08 14:32 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-06-20 23:39 [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 0/5] Auto-fragment large transactions at the block layer Eric Blake
2016-06-20 23:39 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 1/5] block: Fragment reads to max transfer length Eric Blake
2016-07-08 10:56 ` Kevin Wolf
2016-07-08 14:31 ` Eric Blake
2016-06-20 23:39 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 2/5] block: Fragment writes " Eric Blake
2016-06-20 23:39 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 3/5] raw_bsd: Don't advertise flags not supported by protocol layer Eric Blake
2016-07-08 11:05 ` Kevin Wolf
2016-07-08 14:32 ` Eric Blake [this message]
2016-06-20 23:39 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 4/5] nbd: Rely on block layer to break up large requests Eric Blake
2016-06-20 23:39 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 5/5] nbd: Drop unused offset parameter Eric Blake
2016-07-08 11:11 ` Kevin Wolf
2016-06-21 3:19 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 6/5] iscsi: Rely on block layer to break up large requests Eric Blake
2016-06-21 4:17 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 0/5] Auto-fragment large transactions at the block layer Eric Blake
2016-06-21 10:23 ` Stefan Hajnoczi
2016-06-21 10:43 ` Kevin Wolf
2016-06-22 11:41 ` Stefan Hajnoczi
2016-06-21 22:05 ` Eric Blake
2016-06-22 11:41 ` Stefan Hajnoczi
2016-06-22 5:54 ` Fam Zheng
2016-07-06 2:04 ` Eric Blake
2016-07-08 11:15 ` Kevin Wolf
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=577FB96E.80607@redhat.com \
--to=eblake@redhat.com \
--cc=kwolf@redhat.com \
--cc=mreitz@redhat.com \
--cc=qemu-block@nongnu.org \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).