From: Zhang Chen <zhangchen.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com>
To: Jason Wang <jasowang@redhat.com>, qemu devel <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
Cc: Li Zhijian <lizhijian@cn.fujitsu.com>,
"eddie . dong" <eddie.dong@intel.com>,
"Dr . David Alan Gilbert" <dgilbert@redhat.com>,
zhanghailiang <zhang.zhanghailiang@huawei.com>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [RFC PATCH V5 4/4] colo-compare: add TCP, UDP, ICMP packet comparison
Date: Mon, 11 Jul 2016 18:02:19 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <57836EAB.5090007@cn.fujitsu.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <577F6B8D.2050309@redhat.com>
On 07/08/2016 04:59 PM, Jason Wang wrote:
>
>
> On 2016年06月23日 19:34, Zhang Chen wrote:
>> Signed-off-by: Zhang Chen <zhangchen.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Li Zhijian <lizhijian@cn.fujitsu.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Wen Congyang <wency@cn.fujitsu.com>
>> ---
>> net/colo-compare.c | 171
>> +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
>> trace-events | 6 ++
>> 2 files changed, 173 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> Commit log please.
OK.
>
>> diff --git a/net/colo-compare.c b/net/colo-compare.c
>> index 928d729..addf704 100644
>> --- a/net/colo-compare.c
>> +++ b/net/colo-compare.c
>> @@ -18,6 +18,7 @@
>> #include "qapi/qmp/qerror.h"
>> #include "qapi/error.h"
>> #include "net/net.h"
>> +#include "net/eth.h"
>> #include "net/vhost_net.h"
>> #include "qom/object_interfaces.h"
>> #include "qemu/iov.h"
>> @@ -180,9 +181,155 @@ static int colo_packet_compare(Packet *ppkt,
>> Packet *spkt)
>> }
>> }
>> -static int colo_packet_compare_all(Packet *spkt, Packet *ppkt)
>> +/*
>> + * called from the compare thread on the primary
>> + * for compare tcp packet
>> + * compare_tcp copied from Dr. David Alan Gilbert's branch
>> + */
>> +static int colo_packet_compare_tcp(Packet *spkt, Packet *ppkt)
>> +{
>> + struct tcphdr *ptcp, *stcp;
>> + int res;
>> + char *sdebug, *ddebug;
>> +
>> + trace_colo_compare_main("compare tcp");
>> + if (ppkt->size != spkt->size) {
>> + if (trace_event_get_state(TRACE_COLO_COMPARE_MISCOMPARE)) {
>> + trace_colo_compare_main("pkt size not same");
>> + }
>> + return -1;
>> + }
>> +
>> + ptcp = (struct tcphdr *)ppkt->transport_layer;
>> + stcp = (struct tcphdr *)spkt->transport_layer;
>> +
>> + if (ptcp->th_seq != stcp->th_seq) {
>> + if (trace_event_get_state(TRACE_COLO_COMPARE_MISCOMPARE)) {
>> + trace_colo_compare_main("pkt tcp seq not same");
>> + }
>> + return -1;
>> + }
>> +
>> + /*
>> + * The 'identification' field in the IP header is *very* random
>> + * it almost never matches. Fudge this by ignoring differences in
>> + * unfragmented packets; they'll normally sort themselves out if
>> different
>> + * anyway, and it should recover at the TCP level.
>> + * An alternative would be to get both the primary and secondary
>> to rewrite
>> + * somehow; but that would need some sync traffic to sync the state
>> + */
>> + if (ntohs(ppkt->ip->ip_off) & IP_DF) {
>> + spkt->ip->ip_id = ppkt->ip->ip_id;
>> + /* and the sum will be different if the IDs were different */
>> + spkt->ip->ip_sum = ppkt->ip->ip_sum;
>> + }
>
> I was considering, can we do some trick in rewriter instead of here?
In secondary, we have no way to get primary ppkt->ip->ip_off.
this flag just use in IP fragmentation. so, that is no affect currently.
we will fix it after we support IP fragmentation func.
>
>> +
>> + res = memcmp(ppkt->data + ETH_HLEN, spkt->data + ETH_HLEN,
>> + (spkt->size - ETH_HLEN));
>> +
>> + if (res != 0 &&
>> trace_event_get_state(TRACE_COLO_COMPARE_MISCOMPARE)) {
>> + sdebug = strdup(inet_ntoa(ppkt->ip->ip_src));
>> + ddebug = strdup(inet_ntoa(ppkt->ip->ip_dst));
>> + fprintf(stderr, "%s: src/dst: %s/%s p: seq/ack=%u/%u"
>> + " s: seq/ack=%u/%u res=%d flags=%x/%x\n", __func__,
>> + sdebug, ddebug,
>> + ntohl(ptcp->th_seq), ntohl(ptcp->th_ack),
>> + ntohl(stcp->th_seq), ntohl(stcp->th_ack),
>> + res, ptcp->th_flags, stcp->th_flags);
>> +
>> + trace_colo_compare_tcp_miscompare("Primary len", ppkt->size);
>> + qemu_hexdump((char *)ppkt->data, stderr, "colo-compare",
>> ppkt->size);
>> + trace_colo_compare_tcp_miscompare("Secondary len", spkt->size);
>> + qemu_hexdump((char *)spkt->data, stderr, "colo-compare",
>> spkt->size);
>> +
>> + g_free(sdebug);
>> + g_free(ddebug);
>> + }
>> +
>> + return res;
>> +}
>> +
>> +/*
>> + * called from the compare thread on the primary
>> + * for compare udp packet
>> + */
>> +static int colo_packet_compare_udp(Packet *spkt, Packet *ppkt)
>> +{
>> + int ret;
>> +
>> + trace_colo_compare_main("compare udp");
>> + ret = colo_packet_compare(ppkt, spkt);
>> +
>> + if (ret) {
>> + trace_colo_compare_udp_miscompare("primary pkt size",
>> ppkt->size);
>> + qemu_hexdump((char *)ppkt->data, stderr, "colo-compare",
>> ppkt->size);
>> + trace_colo_compare_udp_miscompare("Secondary pkt size",
>> spkt->size);
>> + qemu_hexdump((char *)spkt->data, stderr, "colo-compare",
>> spkt->size);
>> + }
>> +
>> + return ret;
>> +}
>> +
>> +/*
>> + * called from the compare thread on the primary
>> + * for compare icmp packet
>> + */
>> +static int colo_packet_compare_icmp(Packet *spkt, Packet *ppkt)
>> +{
>> + int network_length;
>> + struct icmp *icmp_ppkt, *icmp_spkt;
>> +
>> + trace_colo_compare_main("compare icmp");
>> + network_length = ppkt->ip->ip_hl * 4;
>> + if (ppkt->size != spkt->size ||
>> + ppkt->size < network_length + ETH_HLEN) {
>> + trace_colo_compare_icmp_miscompare_size(ppkt->size,
>> spkt->size);
>> + return -1;
>> + }
>> + icmp_ppkt = (struct icmp *)(ppkt->data + network_length +
>> ETH_HLEN);
>> + icmp_spkt = (struct icmp *)(spkt->data + network_length +
>> ETH_HLEN);
>> +
>> + if ((icmp_ppkt->icmp_type == icmp_spkt->icmp_type) &&
>> + (icmp_ppkt->icmp_code == icmp_spkt->icmp_code)) {
>> + if (icmp_ppkt->icmp_type == ICMP_REDIRECT) {
>> + if (icmp_ppkt->icmp_gwaddr.s_addr !=
>> + icmp_spkt->icmp_gwaddr.s_addr) {
>> + trace_colo_compare_main("icmp_gwaddr.s_addr not same");
>> + trace_colo_compare_icmp_miscompare_addr("ppkt s_addr",
>> + inet_ntoa(icmp_ppkt->icmp_gwaddr));
>> + trace_colo_compare_icmp_miscompare_addr("spkt s_addr",
>> + inet_ntoa(icmp_spkt->icmp_gwaddr));
>> + return -1;
>> + }
>> + } else if ((icmp_ppkt->icmp_type == ICMP_UNREACH) &&
>> + (icmp_ppkt->icmp_type == ICMP_UNREACH_NEEDFRAG)) {
>> + if (icmp_ppkt->icmp_nextmtu != icmp_spkt->icmp_nextmtu) {
>> + trace_colo_compare_main("icmp_nextmtu not same");
>> + trace_colo_compare_icmp_miscompare_mtu("ppkt nextmtu",
>> + icmp_ppkt->icmp_nextmtu);
>> + trace_colo_compare_icmp_miscompare_mtu("spkt nextmtu",
>> + icmp_spkt->icmp_nextmtu);
>> + return -1;
>> + }
>> + }
>> + } else {
>> + return -1;
>> + }
>
> Why only compare part of icmp packet?
>
That's include most of situation, increase all part of icmp
can reduce compare efficiency.
Thanks
Zhang Chen
>> +
>> + return 0;
>> +}
>> +
>> +/*
>> + * called from the compare thread on the primary
>> + * for compare other packet
>> + */
>> +static int colo_packet_compare_other(Packet *spkt, Packet *ppkt)
>> {
>> - trace_colo_compare_main("compare all");
>> + trace_colo_compare_main("compare other");
>> + trace_colo_compare_ip_info(ppkt->size, inet_ntoa(ppkt->ip->ip_src),
>> + inet_ntoa(ppkt->ip->ip_dst), spkt->size,
>> + inet_ntoa(spkt->ip->ip_src),
>> + inet_ntoa(spkt->ip->ip_dst));
>> return colo_packet_compare(ppkt, spkt);
>> }
>> @@ -221,8 +368,24 @@ static void colo_compare_connection(void
>> *opaque, void *user_data)
>> while (!g_queue_is_empty(&conn->primary_list) &&
>> !g_queue_is_empty(&conn->secondary_list)) {
>> pkt = g_queue_pop_tail(&conn->primary_list);
>> - result = g_queue_find_custom(&conn->secondary_list,
>> - pkt,
>> (GCompareFunc)colo_packet_compare_all);
>> + switch (conn->ip_proto) {
>> + case IPPROTO_TCP:
>> + result = g_queue_find_custom(&conn->secondary_list,
>> + pkt, (GCompareFunc)colo_packet_compare_tcp);
>> + break;
>> + case IPPROTO_UDP:
>> + result = g_queue_find_custom(&conn->secondary_list,
>> + pkt, (GCompareFunc)colo_packet_compare_udp);
>> + break;
>> + case IPPROTO_ICMP:
>> + result = g_queue_find_custom(&conn->secondary_list,
>> + pkt, (GCompareFunc)colo_packet_compare_icmp);
>> + break;
>> + default:
>> + result = g_queue_find_custom(&conn->secondary_list,
>> + pkt, (GCompareFunc)colo_packet_compare_other);
>> + break;
>> + }
>> if (result) {
>> ret = compare_chr_send(s->chr_out, pkt->data, pkt->size);
>> diff --git a/trace-events b/trace-events
>> index 1537e91..6686cdf 100644
>> --- a/trace-events
>> +++ b/trace-events
>> @@ -1919,5 +1919,11 @@ aspeed_vic_write(uint64_t offset, unsigned
>> size, uint32_t data) "To 0x%" PRIx64
>> # net/colo-compare.c
>> colo_compare_main(const char *chr) ": %s"
>> +colo_compare_tcp_miscompare(const char *sta, int size) ": %s = %d"
>> +colo_compare_udp_miscompare(const char *sta, int size) ": %s = %d"
>> +colo_compare_icmp_miscompare_size(int psize, int ssize) ":ppkt size
>> = %d spkt size = %d"
>> +colo_compare_icmp_miscompare_addr(const char *sta, const char *stb)
>> ": %s %s"
>> +colo_compare_icmp_miscompare_mtu(const char *sta, int size) ": %s %d"
>> colo_compare_ip_info(int psize, const char *sta, const char *stb,
>> int ssize, const char *stc, const char *std) "ppkt size = %d, ip_src
>> = %s, ip_dst = %s, spkt size = %d, ip_src = %s, ip_dst = %s"
>> colo_old_packet_check_found(int64_t old_time) "%" PRId64
>> +colo_compare_miscompare(void) ""
>
>
>
> .
>
--
Thanks
zhangchen
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-07-11 10:01 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-06-23 11:34 [Qemu-devel] [RFC PATCH V5 0/4] Introduce COLO-compare Zhang Chen
2016-06-23 11:34 ` [Qemu-devel] [RFC PATCH V5 1/4] colo-compare: introduce colo compare initialization Zhang Chen
2016-07-08 3:40 ` Jason Wang
2016-07-08 8:21 ` Zhang Chen
2016-07-08 9:12 ` Jason Wang
2016-07-11 5:14 ` Zhang Chen
2016-06-23 11:34 ` [Qemu-devel] [RFC PATCH V5 2/4] colo-compare: track connection and enqueue packet Zhang Chen
2016-07-08 4:07 ` Jason Wang
2016-07-08 9:56 ` Zhang Chen
2016-07-11 5:41 ` Jason Wang
2016-07-12 5:42 ` Zhang Chen
2016-06-23 11:34 ` [Qemu-devel] [RFC PATCH V5 3/4] colo-compare: introduce packet comparison thread Zhang Chen
2016-07-08 4:23 ` Jason Wang
2016-07-11 7:17 ` Zhang Chen
2016-06-23 11:34 ` [Qemu-devel] [RFC PATCH V5 4/4] colo-compare: add TCP, UDP, ICMP packet comparison Zhang Chen
2016-07-08 8:59 ` Jason Wang
2016-07-11 10:02 ` Zhang Chen [this message]
2016-07-13 2:54 ` Jason Wang
2016-07-13 5:10 ` Zhang Chen
2016-07-07 7:47 ` [Qemu-devel] [RFC PATCH V5 0/4] Introduce COLO-compare Zhang Chen
2016-07-07 8:41 ` Jason Wang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=57836EAB.5090007@cn.fujitsu.com \
--to=zhangchen.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com \
--cc=dgilbert@redhat.com \
--cc=eddie.dong@intel.com \
--cc=jasowang@redhat.com \
--cc=lizhijian@cn.fujitsu.com \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=zhang.zhanghailiang@huawei.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).