From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:35947)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <den@virtuozzo.com>) id 1bNmCB-00004v-Mk
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 14 Jul 2016 15:21:16 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <den@virtuozzo.com>) id 1bNmC7-0006GS-EV
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 14 Jul 2016 15:21:14 -0400
References: <1468503209-19498-1-git-send-email-den@openvz.org>
	<1468503209-19498-5-git-send-email-den@openvz.org>
	<5787BB8E.5050003@redhat.com>
From: "Denis V. Lunev" <den@openvz.org>
Message-ID: <5787C264.9010804@openvz.org>
Date: Thu, 14 Jul 2016 19:48:36 +0300
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <5787BB8E.5050003@redhat.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v3 4/8] mirror: create mirror_dirty_init
 helper for mirror_run
List-Id: <qemu-devel.nongnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/options/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/>
List-Post: <mailto:qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=subscribe>
To: Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com>, qemu-block@nongnu.org, qemu-devel@nongnu.org
Cc: Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com>, Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>, Max
	Reitz <mreitz@redhat.com>, Jeff Cody <jcody@redhat.com>

On 07/14/2016 07:19 PM, Eric Blake wrote:
> On 07/14/2016 07:33 AM, Denis V. Lunev wrote:
>> The code inside the helper will be extended in the next patch. mirror_run
>> itself is overbloated at the moment.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Denis V. Lunev <den@openvz.org>
>> Reviewed-by: Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy<vsementsov@virtuozzo.com>
>> Reviewed-by: Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com>
> I did NOT give R-b on v2 3/7.  In particular, this patch has semantic
> changes that I requested on v2, and so you want to make sure I re-review
> it (I often skip re-reviewing a patch that has my R-b listed, on the
> grounds that I'm trusting your judgment that it hasn't substantially
> changed since my last time through it; but here, you have changed it
> since last time).
>
sorry :(