From: Cao jin <caoj.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com>
To: "Daniel P. Berrange" <berrange@redhat.com>
Cc: Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com>,
qemu-devel@nongnu.org, Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
Gerd Hoffmann <kraxel@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 2/2] util/qemu-sockets: shoot unix_nonblocking_connect()
Date: Fri, 22 Jul 2016 19:05:26 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5791FDF6.3000501@cn.fujitsu.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20160722103800.GQ20567@redhat.com>
On 07/22/2016 06:38 PM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 22, 2016 at 06:43:51PM +0800, Cao jin wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 07/22/2016 06:30 PM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
>>> On Fri, Jul 22, 2016 at 06:34:11PM +0800, Cao jin wrote:
>>>> Hi Daniel
>>>>
>>>> On 07/21/2016 11:39 PM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
>>>>> On Thu, Jul 21, 2016 at 08:42:25AM -0600, Eric Blake wrote:
>>>>>> On 07/21/2016 04:33 AM, Cao jin wrote:
>>>>>>> It is never used, and now all connect is nonblocking via
>>>>>>> inet_connect_addr().
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Could be squashed with 1/2. In fact, if you squash it, I'd title the patch:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> util: Drop unused *_nonblocking_connect() functions
>>>>>>
>>>>>> You may also want to call out which commit id rendered the functions unused.
>>>>>
>>>>> Well once those two functions are dropped the only other place accepting
>>>>> NonBlockingConnectHandler is the socket_connect() method. Since nearly
>>>>> everything is converted to QIOChannel now, there's only one caller of
>>>>> socket_connect() left, and that's net/socket.c
>>>>>
>>>>> Any newly written code which needs a non-blocking connect should use the
>>>>> QIOChannel code, so I don't see any further usage of socket_connect()
>>>>> being added.
>>>>>
>>>>> IOW, we can rip out NonBlockingConnectHandler as a concept entirely, not
>>>>> merely drop the *_nonblocking_connect() methods.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> I don't quite follow the "rip out NonBlockingConnectHandler" thing.
>>>> According what I learned from code, we offered non-blocking connection
>>>> mechanism, but it seems nobody use it(all callers of socket_connect() set
>>>> callback as NULL), so, do you mean removing this mechanism?
>>>
>>> Yes, remove it all, as it is no longer needed.
>>>
>>
>> Thanks for clarifying. Actually, I am still curious why nobody want to use
>> this mechanism, is there any disadvantage? And why this mechanism is
>> introduced in
>
> As mentioned previously it is obsolete as all new code will use the QIOChannel
> APIs which already provide non-blocking connect in a different manner. The
> qemu-sockets non-blocking code never worked properly in the first place
> because it calls getaddrinfo() which blocks on DNS lookups.
>
Aha! I see! And also I see the comment you left in the code:
/* socket_connect() does a non-blocking connect(), but it
* still blocks in DNS lookups, so we must use a thread */
Thanks very much, and I think maybe I can do this cleanup work:)
> Regards,
> Daniel
>
--
Yours Sincerely,
Cao jin
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-07-22 10:58 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-07-21 10:33 [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 0/2] qemu-sockets: remove useless functions Cao jin
2016-07-21 10:33 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 1/2] util/qemu-sockets: shoot inet_nonblocking_connect() Cao jin
2016-07-21 14:41 ` Eric Blake
2016-07-21 10:33 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 2/2] util/qemu-sockets: shoot unix_nonblocking_connect() Cao jin
2016-07-21 14:42 ` Eric Blake
2016-07-21 15:39 ` Daniel P. Berrange
2016-07-22 10:34 ` Cao jin
2016-07-22 10:30 ` Daniel P. Berrange
2016-07-22 10:43 ` Cao jin
2016-07-22 10:38 ` Daniel P. Berrange
2016-07-22 11:05 ` Cao jin [this message]
2016-07-21 13:41 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 0/2] qemu-sockets: remove useless functions Cao jin
2016-07-21 14:28 ` Paolo Bonzini
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=5791FDF6.3000501@cn.fujitsu.com \
--to=caoj.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com \
--cc=berrange@redhat.com \
--cc=eblake@redhat.com \
--cc=kraxel@redhat.com \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).