From: Gavin Shan <gshan@redhat.com>
To: eric.auger@redhat.com, qemu-arm@nongnu.org
Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org, maz@kernel.org, cohuck@redhat.com,
zhenyzha@redhat.com, richard.henderson@linaro.org,
peter.maydell@linaro.org, shan.gavin@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 4/5] hw/arm/virt: Improve high memory region address assignment
Date: Thu, 29 Sep 2022 09:37:57 +1000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <580f5f69-d794-3792-2c99-5cb367a5e8c0@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <6c9a644a-6add-af29-8463-eddb101c1c99@redhat.com>
Hi Eric,
On 9/28/22 10:51 PM, Eric Auger wrote:
> On 9/22/22 01:13, Gavin Shan wrote:
>> There are three high memory regions, which are VIRT_HIGH_REDIST2,
>> VIRT_HIGH_PCIE_ECAM and VIRT_HIGH_PCIE_MMIO. Their base addresses
>> are floating on highest RAM address. However, they can be disabled
>> in several cases.
>>
>> (1) One specific high memory region is disabled by developer by
>> toggling vms->highmem_{redists, ecam, mmio}.
>>
>> (2) VIRT_HIGH_PCIE_ECAM region is disabled on machine, which is
>> 'virt-2.12' or ealier than it.
>>
>> (3) VIRT_HIGH_PCIE_ECAM region is disabled when firmware is loaded
>> on 32-bits system.
>>
>> (4) One specific high memory region is disabled when it breaks the
>> PA space limit.
>>
>> The current implementation of virt_set_memmap() isn't comprehensive
>> because the space for one specific high memory region is always
>> reserved from the PA space for case (1), (2) and (3). In the code,
>> 'base' and 'vms->highest_gpa' are always increased for those three
>> cases. It's unnecessary since the assigned space of the disabled
>> high memory region won't be used afterwards.
>>
>> This improves the address assignment for those three high memory
>> region by skipping the address assignment for one specific high
>> memory region if it has been disabled in case (1), (2) and (3).
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Gavin Shan <gshan@redhat.com>
>> ---
>> hw/arm/virt.c | 44 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++------------------
>> 1 file changed, 26 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/hw/arm/virt.c b/hw/arm/virt.c
>> index b0b679d1f4..b702f8f2b5 100644
>> --- a/hw/arm/virt.c
>> +++ b/hw/arm/virt.c
>> @@ -1693,15 +1693,31 @@ static void virt_set_high_memmap(VirtMachineState *vms,
>> hwaddr base, int pa_bits)
>> {
>> hwaddr region_base, region_size;
>> - bool fits;
>> + bool *region_enabled, fits;
> IDo you really need a pointer? If the region is unknown this is a bug in
> virt code.
The pointer is needed so that we can disable the region by setting 'false'
to it at later point. Yeah, I think you're correct that 'unknown region'
is a bug and we need to do assert(region_enabled), or something like below.
>> int i;
>>
>> for (i = VIRT_LOWMEMMAP_LAST; i < ARRAY_SIZE(extended_memmap); i++) {
>> region_base = ROUND_UP(base, extended_memmap[i].size);
>> region_size = extended_memmap[i].size;
>>
>> - vms->memmap[i].base = region_base;
>> - vms->memmap[i].size = region_size;
>> + switch (i) {
>> + case VIRT_HIGH_GIC_REDIST2:
>> + region_enabled = &vms->highmem_redists;
>> + break;
>> + case VIRT_HIGH_PCIE_ECAM:
>> + region_enabled = &vms->highmem_ecam;
>> + break;
>> + case VIRT_HIGH_PCIE_MMIO:
>> + region_enabled = &vms->highmem_mmio;
>> + break;
> While we are at it I would change the vms fields dealing with those
> highmem regions and turn those fields into an array of bool indexed
> using i - VIRT_LOWMEMMAP_LAST (using a macro or something alike). We
> would not be obliged to have this switch, now duplicated.
It makes sense to me. How about to have something like below in v4?
static inline bool *virt_get_high_memmap_enabled(VirtMachineState *vms, int index)
{
bool *enabled_array[] = {
&vms->highmem_redists,
&vms->highmem_ecam,
&vms->highmem_mmio,
};
assert(index - VIRT_LOWMEMMAP_LAST < ARRAY_SIZE(enabled_array));
return enabled_array[index - VIRT_LOWMEMMAP_LAST];
}
>> + default:
>> + region_enabled = NULL;
>> + }
>> +
>> + /* Skip unknown region */
>> + if (!region_enabled) {
>> + continue;
>> + }
>>
>> /*
>> * Check each device to see if they fit in the PA space,
>> @@ -1710,23 +1726,15 @@ static void virt_set_high_memmap(VirtMachineState *vms,
>> * For each device that doesn't fit, disable it.
>> */
>> fits = (region_base + region_size) <= BIT_ULL(pa_bits);
>> - if (fits) {
>> - vms->highest_gpa = region_base + region_size - 1;
>> - }
>> + if (*region_enabled && fits) {
>> + vms->memmap[i].base = region_base;
>> + vms->memmap[i].size = region_size;
>>
>> - switch (i) {
>> - case VIRT_HIGH_GIC_REDIST2:
>> - vms->highmem_redists &= fits;
>> - break;
>> - case VIRT_HIGH_PCIE_ECAM:
>> - vms->highmem_ecam &= fits;
>> - break;
>> - case VIRT_HIGH_PCIE_MMIO:
>> - vms->highmem_mmio &= fits;
>> - break;
>> + vms->highest_gpa = region_base + region_size - 1;
>> + base = region_base + region_size;
>> + } else {
>> + *region_enabled = false;
>> }
>> -
>> - base = region_base + region_size;
>> }
>> }
>>
Thanks,
Gavin
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-09-28 23:39 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-09-21 23:13 [PATCH v3 0/5] hw/arm/virt: Improve address assignment for high memory regions Gavin Shan
2022-09-21 23:13 ` [PATCH v3 1/5] hw/arm/virt: Introduce virt_set_high_memmap() helper Gavin Shan
2022-09-28 12:09 ` Eric Auger
2022-09-29 13:48 ` Cornelia Huck
2022-09-21 23:13 ` [PATCH v3 2/5] hw/arm/virt: Rename variable size to region_size in virt_set_high_memmap() Gavin Shan
2022-10-03 8:26 ` Eric Auger
2022-09-21 23:13 ` [PATCH v3 3/5] hw/arm/virt: Introduce variable region_base " Gavin Shan
2022-09-28 12:10 ` Eric Auger
2022-09-28 23:15 ` Gavin Shan
2022-10-03 8:26 ` Eric Auger
2022-10-03 8:27 ` Eric Auger
2022-09-21 23:13 ` [PATCH v3 4/5] hw/arm/virt: Improve high memory region address assignment Gavin Shan
2022-09-28 12:51 ` Eric Auger
2022-09-28 23:37 ` Gavin Shan [this message]
2022-10-03 8:44 ` Eric Auger
2022-10-03 22:17 ` Gavin Shan
2022-10-04 7:06 ` Eric Auger
2022-09-21 23:13 ` [PATCH v3 5/5] hw/arm/virt: Add 'highmem-compact' property Gavin Shan
2022-09-28 12:22 ` Eric Auger
2022-09-28 23:49 ` Gavin Shan
2022-09-29 10:27 ` Cornelia Huck
2022-09-29 11:21 ` Gavin Shan
2022-10-03 8:49 ` Eric Auger
2022-10-03 23:50 ` Gavin Shan
2022-09-22 1:50 ` [PATCH v3 0/5] hw/arm/virt: Improve address assignment for high memory regions Zhenyu Zhang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=580f5f69-d794-3792-2c99-5cb367a5e8c0@redhat.com \
--to=gshan@redhat.com \
--cc=cohuck@redhat.com \
--cc=eric.auger@redhat.com \
--cc=maz@kernel.org \
--cc=peter.maydell@linaro.org \
--cc=qemu-arm@nongnu.org \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=richard.henderson@linaro.org \
--cc=shan.gavin@gmail.com \
--cc=zhenyzha@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).