qemu-devel.nongnu.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Cédric Le Goater" <clegoate@redhat.com>
To: "Jamin Lin" <jamin_lin@aspeedtech.com>,
	"Cédric Le Goater" <clg@kaod.org>,
	"Peter Maydell" <peter.maydell@linaro.org>,
	"Andrew Jeffery" <andrew@codeconstruct.com.au>,
	"Joel Stanley" <joel@jms.id.au>,
	"open list:ASPEED BMCs" <qemu-arm@nongnu.org>,
	"open list:All patches CC here" <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
Cc: troy_lee@aspeedtech.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] aspeed: introduce a new UART0 device name
Date: Fri, 9 Feb 2024 09:27:23 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <589b2a36-89fa-4187-b0b6-887740d7e2fe@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240207200220.453244-2-jamin_lin@aspeedtech.com>

Hello Jamin,

On 2/7/24 21:02, Jamin Lin via wrote:
> The Aspeed datasheet refers to the UART controllers
> as UART1 - UART13 for the ast10x0, ast2600, ast2500
> and ast2400 SoCs and the Aspeed ast2700 introduces an UART0
> and the UART controllers as UART0 - UART12.
> 
> To keep the naming in the QEMU models
> in sync with the datasheet, let's introduce a new  UART0 device name
> and do the required adjustements, etc ...

Please drop the etc...

> 
> Signed-off-by: Troy Lee <troy_lee@aspeedtech.com>
> Signed-off-by: Jamin Lin <jamin_lin@aspeedtech.com>
> ---
>   hw/arm/aspeed.c             | 13 ++++++++-----
>   hw/arm/aspeed_ast10x0.c     |  1 +
>   hw/arm/aspeed_ast2400.c     |  2 ++
>   hw/arm/aspeed_ast2600.c     |  1 +
>   hw/arm/aspeed_soc_common.c  | 14 +++++++++-----
>   include/hw/arm/aspeed_soc.h |  2 ++
>   6 files changed, 23 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/hw/arm/aspeed.c b/hw/arm/aspeed.c
> index 09b1e823ba..06d863958b 100644
> --- a/hw/arm/aspeed.c
> +++ b/hw/arm/aspeed.c
> @@ -342,7 +342,7 @@ static void connect_serial_hds_to_uarts(AspeedMachineState *bmc)
>       int uart_chosen = bmc->uart_chosen ? bmc->uart_chosen : amc->uart_default;
>   
>       aspeed_soc_uart_set_chr(s, uart_chosen, serial_hd(0));
> -    for (int i = 1, uart = ASPEED_DEV_UART1; i < sc->uarts_num; i++, uart++) {
> +    for (int i = 0, uart = sc->uarts_base; i < sc->uarts_num; i++, uart++) {
>           if (uart == uart_chosen) {
>               continue;
>           }
> @@ -1094,7 +1094,7 @@ static char *aspeed_get_bmc_console(Object *obj, Error **errp)
>       AspeedMachineClass *amc = ASPEED_MACHINE_GET_CLASS(bmc);
>       int uart_chosen = bmc->uart_chosen ? bmc->uart_chosen : amc->uart_default;
>   
> -    return g_strdup_printf("uart%d", uart_chosen - ASPEED_DEV_UART1 + 1);
> +    return g_strdup_printf("uart%d", uart_chosen - ASPEED_DEV_UART0);
>   }
>   
>   static void aspeed_set_bmc_console(Object *obj, const char *value, Error **errp)
> @@ -1103,6 +1103,8 @@ static void aspeed_set_bmc_console(Object *obj, const char *value, Error **errp)
>       AspeedMachineClass *amc = ASPEED_MACHINE_GET_CLASS(bmc);
>       AspeedSoCClass *sc = ASPEED_SOC_CLASS(object_class_by_name(amc->soc_name));
>       int val;
> +    int start = sc->uarts_base - ASPEED_DEV_UART0;
> +    int end = start + sc->uarts_num;


To help the reader, I would introduce these helpers at the end of
aspeed_soc.h :

     static inline int aspeed_uart_index(int uart_dev)
     {
         return uart_dev - ASPEED_DEV_UART0;
     }
     
     static inline int aspeed_uart_first(AspeedSoCClass *sc)
     {
         return aspeed_uart_index(sc->uarts_base);
     }
     
     static inline int aspeed_uart_last(AspeedSoCClass *sc)
     {
         return aspeed_uart_first(sc) + sc->uarts_num - 1;
     }
     

>       if (sscanf(value, "uart%u", &val) != 1) {
>           error_setg(errp, "Bad value for \"uart\" property");
> @@ -1110,11 +1112,12 @@ static void aspeed_set_bmc_console(Object *obj, const char *value, Error **errp)
>       }
>   
>       /* The number of UART depends on the SoC */
> -    if (val < 1 || val > sc->uarts_num) {
> -        error_setg(errp, "\"uart\" should be in range [1 - %d]", sc->uarts_num);
> +    if (val < start || val >= end) {
> +        error_setg(errp, "\"uart\" should be in range [%d - %d]",
> +                   start, end - 1);
>           return;
>       }
> -    bmc->uart_chosen = ASPEED_DEV_UART1 + val - 1;
> +    bmc->uart_chosen = val + ASPEED_DEV_UART0;
>   }
>   
>   static void aspeed_machine_class_props_init(ObjectClass *oc)
> diff --git a/hw/arm/aspeed_ast10x0.c b/hw/arm/aspeed_ast10x0.c
> index c3b5116a6a..2634e0f654 100644
> --- a/hw/arm/aspeed_ast10x0.c
> +++ b/hw/arm/aspeed_ast10x0.c
> @@ -436,6 +436,7 @@ static void aspeed_soc_ast1030_class_init(ObjectClass *klass, void *data)
>       sc->wdts_num = 4;
>       sc->macs_num = 1;
>       sc->uarts_num = 13;
> +    sc->uarts_base = ASPEED_DEV_UART1;
>       sc->irqmap = aspeed_soc_ast1030_irqmap;
>       sc->memmap = aspeed_soc_ast1030_memmap;
>       sc->num_cpus = 1;
> diff --git a/hw/arm/aspeed_ast2400.c b/hw/arm/aspeed_ast2400.c
> index 8829561bb6..95da85fee0 100644
> --- a/hw/arm/aspeed_ast2400.c
> +++ b/hw/arm/aspeed_ast2400.c
> @@ -523,6 +523,7 @@ static void aspeed_soc_ast2400_class_init(ObjectClass *oc, void *data)
>       sc->wdts_num     = 2;
>       sc->macs_num     = 2;
>       sc->uarts_num    = 5;
> +    sc->uarts_base   = ASPEED_DEV_UART1;
>       sc->irqmap       = aspeed_soc_ast2400_irqmap;
>       sc->memmap       = aspeed_soc_ast2400_memmap;
>       sc->num_cpus     = 1;
> @@ -551,6 +552,7 @@ static void aspeed_soc_ast2500_class_init(ObjectClass *oc, void *data)
>       sc->wdts_num     = 3;
>       sc->macs_num     = 2;
>       sc->uarts_num    = 5;
> +    sc->uarts_base   = ASPEED_DEV_UART1;
>       sc->irqmap       = aspeed_soc_ast2500_irqmap;
>       sc->memmap       = aspeed_soc_ast2500_memmap;
>       sc->num_cpus     = 1;
> diff --git a/hw/arm/aspeed_ast2600.c b/hw/arm/aspeed_ast2600.c
> index 4ee32ea99d..f74561ecdc 100644
> --- a/hw/arm/aspeed_ast2600.c
> +++ b/hw/arm/aspeed_ast2600.c
> @@ -666,6 +666,7 @@ static void aspeed_soc_ast2600_class_init(ObjectClass *oc, void *data)
>       sc->wdts_num     = 4;
>       sc->macs_num     = 4;
>       sc->uarts_num    = 13;
> +    sc->uarts_base   = ASPEED_DEV_UART1;
>       sc->irqmap       = aspeed_soc_ast2600_irqmap;
>       sc->memmap       = aspeed_soc_ast2600_memmap;
>       sc->num_cpus     = 2;
> diff --git a/hw/arm/aspeed_soc_common.c b/hw/arm/aspeed_soc_common.c
> index 123a0c432c..54c875c8d5 100644
> --- a/hw/arm/aspeed_soc_common.c
> +++ b/hw/arm/aspeed_soc_common.c
> @@ -36,7 +36,7 @@ bool aspeed_soc_uart_realize(AspeedSoCState *s, Error **errp)
>       AspeedSoCClass *sc = ASPEED_SOC_GET_CLASS(s);
>       SerialMM *smm;
>   
> -    for (int i = 0, uart = ASPEED_DEV_UART1; i < sc->uarts_num; i++, uart++) {
> +    for (int i = 0, uart = sc->uarts_base; i < sc->uarts_num; i++, uart++) {
>           smm = &s->uart[i];
>   
>           /* Chardev property is set by the machine. */
> @@ -58,10 +58,14 @@ bool aspeed_soc_uart_realize(AspeedSoCState *s, Error **errp)
>   void aspeed_soc_uart_set_chr(AspeedSoCState *s, int dev, Chardev *chr)
>   {
>       AspeedSoCClass *sc = ASPEED_SOC_GET_CLASS(s);
> -    int i = dev - ASPEED_DEV_UART1;
> -
> -    g_assert(0 <= i && i < ARRAY_SIZE(s->uart) && i < sc->uarts_num);
> -    qdev_prop_set_chr(DEVICE(&s->uart[i]), "chardev", chr);
> +    int uart_num = dev - ASPEED_DEV_UART0;
> +    int start = sc->uarts_base - ASPEED_DEV_UART0;
> +    int end = start + sc->uarts_num;
> +    int index = uart_num - start;
> +
> +    g_assert(uart_num >= start && uart_num < end);

I don't think this assert is necessary. Only the second one is.

If you want to check the range and return an error, please add an
Error **errp argument and have the callers pass &error_fatal. It would
have the same effect.


Thanks,

C.


> +    g_assert(index < ARRAY_SIZE(s->uart));
> +    qdev_prop_set_chr(DEVICE(&s->uart[index]), "chardev", chr);
>   }
>   
>   /*
> diff --git a/include/hw/arm/aspeed_soc.h b/include/hw/arm/aspeed_soc.h
> index 9d0af84a8c..5ab0902da0 100644
> --- a/include/hw/arm/aspeed_soc.h
> +++ b/include/hw/arm/aspeed_soc.h
> @@ -140,6 +140,7 @@ struct AspeedSoCClass {
>       int wdts_num;
>       int macs_num;
>       int uarts_num;
> +    int uarts_base;
>       const int *irqmap;
>       const hwaddr *memmap;
>       uint32_t num_cpus;
> @@ -151,6 +152,7 @@ const char *aspeed_soc_cpu_type(AspeedSoCClass *sc);
>   enum {
>       ASPEED_DEV_SPI_BOOT,
>       ASPEED_DEV_IOMEM,
> +    ASPEED_DEV_UART0,
>       ASPEED_DEV_UART1,
>       ASPEED_DEV_UART2,
>       ASPEED_DEV_UART3,



  reply	other threads:[~2024-02-09  8:28 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <20240207200220.453244-1-jamin_lin@aspeedtech.com>
2024-02-07 20:02 ` [PATCH v2 1/2] aspeed: introduce a new UART0 device name Jamin Lin via
2024-02-09  8:27   ` Cédric Le Goater [this message]
2024-02-15  1:31     ` Jamin Lin
2024-02-07 20:02 ` [PATCH v2 2/2] aspeed: fix hardcode boot address 0 Jamin Lin via

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=589b2a36-89fa-4187-b0b6-887740d7e2fe@redhat.com \
    --to=clegoate@redhat.com \
    --cc=andrew@codeconstruct.com.au \
    --cc=clg@kaod.org \
    --cc=jamin_lin@aspeedtech.com \
    --cc=joel@jms.id.au \
    --cc=peter.maydell@linaro.org \
    --cc=qemu-arm@nongnu.org \
    --cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
    --cc=troy_lee@aspeedtech.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).