From: Hailiang Zhang <zhang.zhanghailiang@huawei.com>
To: "Dr. David Alan Gilbert" <dgilbert@redhat.com>
Cc: xuquan8@huawei.com, zhangchen.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com,
lizhijian@cn.fujitsu.com, quintela@redhat.com,
eddie.dong@intel.com, qemu-devel@nongnu.org,
amit.shah@redhat.com
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 2/3] COLO: Shutdown related socket fd while do failover
Date: Mon, 13 Feb 2017 12:13:21 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <58A13261.9020202@huawei.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170208195348.GN2341@work-vm>
On 2017/2/9 3:53, Dr. David Alan Gilbert wrote:
> * Hailiang Zhang (zhang.zhanghailiang@huawei.com) wrote:
>> On 2017/1/18 19:01, Dr. David Alan Gilbert wrote:
>>> * zhanghailiang (zhang.zhanghailiang@huawei.com) wrote:
>>>> If the net connection between primary host and secondary host breaks
>>>> while COLO/COLO incoming threads are doing read() or write().
>>>> It will block until connection is timeout, and the failover process
>>>> will be blocked because of it.
>>>>
>>>> So it is necessary to shutdown all the socket fds used by COLO
>>>> to avoid this situation. Besides, we should close the corresponding
>>>> file descriptors after failvoer BH shutdown them,
>>>> Or there will be an error.
>>>
>>> Hi,
>>> There are two parts to this patch:
>>> a) Add some semaphores to sequence failover
>>> b) Use shutdown()
>>>
>>> At first I wondered if perhaps they should be split; but I see
>>> the reason for the semaphores is mostly to stop the race between
>>> the fd's getting closed and the shutdown() calls; so I think it's
>>> OK.
>>>
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> Yes, you are right, maybe i should add some comments about that.
>> Will do in next version.
>>
>>> Do you have any problems with these semaphores during powering off the
>>> guest?
>>>
>>
>> No, we didn't encounter any problems or trigger any bugs in our test
>> with this semaphores. In what places do you doubt it may has problems ? :)
>
> I just wondered about other exit cases other than failover; e.g. what
> if the guest shutdown or something like that, would it get stuck
> waiting for the colo_incoming_sem.
>
Sorry for the late reply, too busy with our project these days ...
Your worry makes sense, we have processed the shutdown case specially,
Let qemu does a checkpoint process (It seems that, we should kick colo
thread which might be waiting for colo_checkpoint_sem.) before exit colo therad.
And for the secondary sides, if it receives shutdown request, it will exit
colo incoming thread after some cleanup works.
Thanks.
Hailiang
> Dave
>
>> Thanks,
>> Hailiang
>>
>>> Dave
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: zhanghailiang <zhang.zhanghailiang@huawei.com>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Li Zhijian <lizhijian@cn.fujitsu.com>
>>>> Reviewed-by: Dr. David Alan Gilbert <dgilbert@redhat.com>
>>>> Cc: Dr. David Alan Gilbert <dgilbert@redhat.com>
>>>> ---
>>>> include/migration/migration.h | 3 +++
>>>> migration/colo.c | 43 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>>> 2 files changed, 46 insertions(+)
>>>>
>>>> diff --git a/include/migration/migration.h b/include/migration/migration.h
>>>> index 487ac1e..7cac877 100644
>>>> --- a/include/migration/migration.h
>>>> +++ b/include/migration/migration.h
>>>> @@ -113,6 +113,7 @@ struct MigrationIncomingState {
>>>> QemuThread colo_incoming_thread;
>>>> /* The coroutine we should enter (back) after failover */
>>>> Coroutine *migration_incoming_co;
>>>> + QemuSemaphore colo_incoming_sem;
>>>>
>>>> /* See savevm.c */
>>>> LoadStateEntry_Head loadvm_handlers;
>>>> @@ -182,6 +183,8 @@ struct MigrationState
>>>> QSIMPLEQ_HEAD(src_page_requests, MigrationSrcPageRequest) src_page_requests;
>>>> /* The RAMBlock used in the last src_page_request */
>>>> RAMBlock *last_req_rb;
>>>> + /* The semaphore is used to notify COLO thread that failover is finished */
>>>> + QemuSemaphore colo_exit_sem;
>>>>
>>>> /* The semaphore is used to notify COLO thread to do checkpoint */
>>>> QemuSemaphore colo_checkpoint_sem;
>>>> diff --git a/migration/colo.c b/migration/colo.c
>>>> index 08b2e46..3222812 100644
>>>> --- a/migration/colo.c
>>>> +++ b/migration/colo.c
>>>> @@ -59,6 +59,18 @@ static void secondary_vm_do_failover(void)
>>>> /* recover runstate to normal migration finish state */
>>>> autostart = true;
>>>> }
>>>> + /*
>>>> + * Make sure COLO incoming thread not block in recv or send,
>>>> + * If mis->from_src_file and mis->to_src_file use the same fd,
>>>> + * The second shutdown() will return -1, we ignore this value,
>>>> + * It is harmless.
>>>> + */
>>>> + if (mis->from_src_file) {
>>>> + qemu_file_shutdown(mis->from_src_file);
>>>> + }
>>>> + if (mis->to_src_file) {
>>>> + qemu_file_shutdown(mis->to_src_file);
>>>> + }
>>>>
>>>> old_state = failover_set_state(FAILOVER_STATUS_ACTIVE,
>>>> FAILOVER_STATUS_COMPLETED);
>>>> @@ -67,6 +79,8 @@ static void secondary_vm_do_failover(void)
>>>> "secondary VM", FailoverStatus_lookup[old_state]);
>>>> return;
>>>> }
>>>> + /* Notify COLO incoming thread that failover work is finished */
>>>> + qemu_sem_post(&mis->colo_incoming_sem);
>>>> /* For Secondary VM, jump to incoming co */
>>>> if (mis->migration_incoming_co) {
>>>> qemu_coroutine_enter(mis->migration_incoming_co);
>>>> @@ -81,6 +95,18 @@ static void primary_vm_do_failover(void)
>>>> migrate_set_state(&s->state, MIGRATION_STATUS_COLO,
>>>> MIGRATION_STATUS_COMPLETED);
>>>>
>>>> + /*
>>>> + * Wake up COLO thread which may blocked in recv() or send(),
>>>> + * The s->rp_state.from_dst_file and s->to_dst_file may use the
>>>> + * same fd, but we still shutdown the fd for twice, it is harmless.
>>>> + */
>>>> + if (s->to_dst_file) {
>>>> + qemu_file_shutdown(s->to_dst_file);
>>>> + }
>>>> + if (s->rp_state.from_dst_file) {
>>>> + qemu_file_shutdown(s->rp_state.from_dst_file);
>>>> + }
>>>> +
>>>> old_state = failover_set_state(FAILOVER_STATUS_ACTIVE,
>>>> FAILOVER_STATUS_COMPLETED);
>>>> if (old_state != FAILOVER_STATUS_ACTIVE) {
>>>> @@ -88,6 +114,8 @@ static void primary_vm_do_failover(void)
>>>> FailoverStatus_lookup[old_state]);
>>>> return;
>>>> }
>>>> + /* Notify COLO thread that failover work is finished */
>>>> + qemu_sem_post(&s->colo_exit_sem);
>>>> }
>>>>
>>>> void colo_do_failover(MigrationState *s)
>>>> @@ -361,6 +389,14 @@ out:
>>>>
>>>> timer_del(s->colo_delay_timer);
>>>>
>>>> + /* Hope this not to be too long to wait here */
>>>> + qemu_sem_wait(&s->colo_exit_sem);
>>>> + qemu_sem_destroy(&s->colo_exit_sem);
>>>> + /*
>>>> + * Must be called after failover BH is completed,
>>>> + * Or the failover BH may shutdown the wrong fd that
>>>> + * re-used by other threads after we release here.
>>>> + */
>>>> if (s->rp_state.from_dst_file) {
>>>> qemu_fclose(s->rp_state.from_dst_file);
>>>> }
>>>> @@ -385,6 +421,7 @@ void migrate_start_colo_process(MigrationState *s)
>>>> s->colo_delay_timer = timer_new_ms(QEMU_CLOCK_HOST,
>>>> colo_checkpoint_notify, s);
>>>>
>>>> + qemu_sem_init(&s->colo_exit_sem, 0);
>>>> migrate_set_state(&s->state, MIGRATION_STATUS_ACTIVE,
>>>> MIGRATION_STATUS_COLO);
>>>> colo_process_checkpoint(s);
>>>> @@ -423,6 +460,8 @@ void *colo_process_incoming_thread(void *opaque)
>>>> uint64_t value;
>>>> Error *local_err = NULL;
>>>>
>>>> + qemu_sem_init(&mis->colo_incoming_sem, 0);
>>>> +
>>>> migrate_set_state(&mis->state, MIGRATION_STATUS_ACTIVE,
>>>> MIGRATION_STATUS_COLO);
>>>>
>>>> @@ -533,6 +572,10 @@ out:
>>>> qemu_fclose(fb);
>>>> }
>>>>
>>>> + /* Hope this not to be too long to loop here */
>>>> + qemu_sem_wait(&mis->colo_incoming_sem);
>>>> + qemu_sem_destroy(&mis->colo_incoming_sem);
>>>> + /* Must be called after failover BH is completed */
>>>> if (mis->to_src_file) {
>>>> qemu_fclose(mis->to_src_file);
>>>> }
>>>> --
>>>> 1.8.3.1
>>>>
>>>>
>>> --
>>> Dr. David Alan Gilbert / dgilbert@redhat.com / Manchester, UK
>>>
>>> .
>>>
>>
>>
> --
> Dr. David Alan Gilbert / dgilbert@redhat.com / Manchester, UK
>
> .
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-02-13 4:14 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-01-17 12:57 [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 0/3] COLO: fix some bugs zhanghailiang
2017-01-17 12:57 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 1/3] COLO: fix setting checkpoint-delay not working properly zhanghailiang
2017-02-08 10:38 ` Dr. David Alan Gilbert
2017-02-08 11:18 ` Hailiang Zhang
2017-01-17 12:57 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 2/3] COLO: Shutdown related socket fd while do failover zhanghailiang
2017-01-18 11:01 ` Dr. David Alan Gilbert
2017-02-08 11:14 ` Hailiang Zhang
2017-02-08 19:53 ` Dr. David Alan Gilbert
2017-02-13 4:13 ` Hailiang Zhang [this message]
2017-01-17 12:57 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 3/3] COLO: Don't process failover request while loading VM's state zhanghailiang
2017-01-17 18:24 ` Eric Blake
2017-01-18 8:19 ` Hailiang Zhang
2017-02-10 15:44 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 0/3] COLO: fix some bugs Dr. David Alan Gilbert
2017-02-13 8:46 ` Hailiang Zhang
2017-02-13 10:17 ` Dr. David Alan Gilbert
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=58A13261.9020202@huawei.com \
--to=zhang.zhanghailiang@huawei.com \
--cc=amit.shah@redhat.com \
--cc=dgilbert@redhat.com \
--cc=eddie.dong@intel.com \
--cc=lizhijian@cn.fujitsu.com \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=quintela@redhat.com \
--cc=xuquan8@huawei.com \
--cc=zhangchen.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).