From: Hailiang Zhang <zhang.zhanghailiang@huawei.com>
To: "Marc-André Lureau" <marcandre.lureau@gmail.com>,
jasowang@redhat.com, zhangchen.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com,
lizhijian@cn.fujitsu.com
Cc: xuquan8@huawei.com, qemu-devel@nongnu.org,
pss.wulizhen@huawei.com, Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 3/4] char: remove the right fd been watched in qemu_chr_fe_set_handlers()
Date: Thu, 16 Feb 2017 20:49:29 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <58A59FD9.3080900@huawei.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAJ+F1CLMKKT_xv4Z5NNfd7rYzcKyrHri=Z7-QSWLoMX0DGBk+Q@mail.gmail.com>
Hi,
On 2017/2/16 18:40, Marc-André Lureau wrote:
> Hi
>
> On Thu, Feb 16, 2017 at 10:08 AM zhanghailiang <
> zhang.zhanghailiang@huawei.com> wrote:
>
>> We can call qemu_chr_fe_set_handlers() to add/remove fd been watched
>> in 'context' which can be either default main context or other explicit
>> context. But the original logic is not correct, we didn't remove
>> the right fd because we call g_main_context_find_source_by_id(NULL, tag)
>> which always try to find the Gsource from default context.
>>
>> Fix it by passing the right context to g_main_context_find_source_by_id().
>>
>> Cc: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
>> Cc: Marc-André Lureau <marcandre.lureau@redhat.com>
>> Signed-off-by: zhanghailiang <zhang.zhanghailiang@huawei.com>
>> ---
>> chardev/char-io.c | 13 +++++++++----
>> chardev/char-io.h | 2 ++
>> chardev/char.c | 2 +-
>> 3 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/chardev/char-io.c b/chardev/char-io.c
>> index 7dfc3f2..a69cc61 100644
>> --- a/chardev/char-io.c
>> +++ b/chardev/char-io.c
>> @@ -127,14 +127,14 @@ guint io_add_watch_poll(Chardev *chr,
>> return tag;
>> }
>>
>> -static void io_remove_watch_poll(guint tag)
>> +static void io_remove_watch_poll(guint tag, GMainContext *context)
>> {
>> GSource *source;
>> IOWatchPoll *iwp;
>>
>> g_return_if_fail(tag > 0);
>>
>> - source = g_main_context_find_source_by_id(NULL, tag);
>> + source = g_main_context_find_source_by_id(context, tag);
>> g_return_if_fail(source != NULL);
>>
>> iwp = io_watch_poll_from_source(source);
>> @@ -146,14 +146,19 @@ static void io_remove_watch_poll(guint tag)
>> g_source_destroy(&iwp->parent);
>> }
>>
>> -void remove_fd_in_watch(Chardev *chr)
>> +void qemu_remove_fd_in_watch(Chardev *chr, GMainContext *context)
>> {
>> if (chr->fd_in_tag) {
>> - io_remove_watch_poll(chr->fd_in_tag);
>> + io_remove_watch_poll(chr->fd_in_tag, context);
>> chr->fd_in_tag = 0;
>> }
>> }
>>
>> +void remove_fd_in_watch(Chardev *chr)
>> +{
>> + qemu_remove_fd_in_watch(chr, NULL);
>> +}
>> +
>>
>
> I would just change the signature of remove_fd_in_watch() instead of
> introducing a function.
>
In that case, i have to modify all the places call this helper,
About eleven places in six files,is it acceptable ?
Thanks.
> int io_channel_send_full(QIOChannel *ioc,
>> const void *buf, size_t len,
>> int *fds, size_t nfds)
>> diff --git a/chardev/char-io.h b/chardev/char-io.h
>> index d7ae5f1..117c888 100644
>> --- a/chardev/char-io.h
>> +++ b/chardev/char-io.h
>> @@ -38,6 +38,8 @@ guint io_add_watch_poll(Chardev *chr,
>>
>> void remove_fd_in_watch(Chardev *chr);
>>
>> +void qemu_remove_fd_in_watch(Chardev *chr, GMainContext *context);
>> +
>> int io_channel_send(QIOChannel *ioc, const void *buf, size_t len);
>>
>> int io_channel_send_full(QIOChannel *ioc, const void *buf, size_t len,
>> diff --git a/chardev/char.c b/chardev/char.c
>> index abd525f..5563375 100644
>> --- a/chardev/char.c
>> +++ b/chardev/char.c
>> @@ -560,7 +560,7 @@ void qemu_chr_fe_set_handlers(CharBackend *b,
>> cc = CHARDEV_GET_CLASS(s);
>> if (!opaque && !fd_can_read && !fd_read && !fd_event) {
>> fe_open = 0;
>> - remove_fd_in_watch(s);
>> + qemu_remove_fd_in_watch(s, context);
>> } else {
>> fe_open = 1;
>> }
>> --
>> 1.8.3.1
>>
>>
>>
> otherwise, looks good to me
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-02-16 12:49 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-02-16 6:00 [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 0/4] colo-compare: fix some bugs zhanghailiang
2017-02-16 6:00 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 1/4] colo-compare: use g_timeout_source_new() to process the stale packets zhanghailiang
2017-02-16 6:00 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 2/4] colo-compare: kick compare thread to exit after some cleanup in finalization zhanghailiang
2017-02-16 6:00 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 3/4] char: remove the right fd been watched in qemu_chr_fe_set_handlers() zhanghailiang
2017-02-16 10:40 ` Marc-André Lureau
2017-02-16 12:49 ` Hailiang Zhang [this message]
2017-02-16 13:04 ` Marc-André Lureau
2017-02-16 13:09 ` Hailiang Zhang
2017-02-16 6:00 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 4/4] colo-compare: Fix removing fds been watched incorrectly in finalization zhanghailiang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=58A59FD9.3080900@huawei.com \
--to=zhang.zhanghailiang@huawei.com \
--cc=jasowang@redhat.com \
--cc=lizhijian@cn.fujitsu.com \
--cc=marcandre.lureau@gmail.com \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=pss.wulizhen@huawei.com \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=xuquan8@huawei.com \
--cc=zhangchen.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).