From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1DAaQq-0000fw-RQ for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sun, 13 Mar 2005 16:15:28 -0500 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1DAaQp-0000fh-Dr for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sun, 13 Mar 2005 16:15:28 -0500 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1DAaQp-0000fe-A8 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sun, 13 Mar 2005 16:15:27 -0500 Received: from [64.233.170.203] (helo=rproxy.gmail.com) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1DAaBr-0004Zg-4X for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sun, 13 Mar 2005 15:59:59 -0500 Received: by rproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id i8so1549377rne for ; Sun, 13 Mar 2005 12:59:49 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <58e14cf005031312534f1c2914@mail.gmail.com> Date: Sun, 13 Mar 2005 13:53:09 -0700 From: Jason Turner Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] parallel port support for qemu. In-Reply-To: <42349F30.4080601@kadu.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit References: <58e14cf0050313064327ab1c8e@mail.gmail.com> <42349F30.4080601@kadu.net> Reply-To: Jason Turner , qemu-devel@nongnu.org List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org On Sun, 13 Mar 2005 21:14:40 +0100, Adrian Smarzewski wrote: > Jason Turner wrote: > > fairly certain that interrupts are not working correctly. However, it > > is good enough that I have managed to read and programming my remote > > control which has a parallel port interface! (This was the remaining > > reason that I had to re-boot into Windows) and should work with > > Lennerts FPGA tools (see above). > > Do you know if there is any possibility to support guardant parallel > port dongles under linux (http://www.guardant.com/)? Do you have some > experience with usb dongles? It's very important for me, could someone > help me? > It's been very long since I have used one of the anti-piracy dongles, but I'm guessing it would work with my patch, or at least could be made to without much more work. Does anyone out there have a parallel port printer they could test with this patch? Or scanner? -Jason -- Everything I know about computers I learned from the Video Professor