qemu-devel.nongnu.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Wei Wang <wei.w.wang@intel.com>
To: Jason Wang <jasowang@redhat.com>, "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>
Cc: "virtio-dev@lists.oasis-open.org"
	<virtio-dev@lists.oasis-open.org>,
	"stefanha@gmail.com" <stefanha@gmail.com>,
	"qemu-devel@nongnu.org" <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>,
	"jan.scheurich@ericsson.com" <jan.scheurich@ericsson.com>,
	"armbru@redhat.com" <armbru@redhat.com>,
	"marcandre.lureau@gmail.com" <marcandre.lureau@gmail.com>,
	"pbonzini@redhat.com" <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [virtio-dev] Re: [virtio-dev] Re: [virtio-dev] Re: [PATCH v1] virtio-net: enable configurable tx queue size
Date: Fri, 16 Jun 2017 18:10:27 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <5943AE93.7020502@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <40a12829-6e84-e63e-ac47-6f09cc85c3cc@redhat.com>

On 06/16/2017 04:57 PM, Jason Wang wrote:
>
>
> On 2017年06月16日 11:22, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
>>> I think the issues can be solved by VIRTIO_F_MAX_CHAIN_SIZE.
>>>
>>> For now, how about splitting it into two series of patches:
>>> 1) enable 1024 tx queue size for vhost-user, to let the users of 
>>> vhost-user
>>> to easily use 1024 queue size.
>> Fine with me. 1) will get property from user but override it on
>> !vhost-user. Do we need a protocol flag? It seems prudent but we get
>> back to cross-version migration issues that are still pending solution.
What do you have in mind about the protocol flag?

Btw, I just tested the patch of 1), and it works fine with migration 
from the
patched to non-patched version of QEMU. I'll send it out. Please have a 
check.


>> Marc Andre, what's the status of that work?
>>
>>> 2) enable VIRTIO_F_MAX_CHAIN_SIZE,  to enhance robustness.
>> Rather, to support it for more backends.
>
> Ok, if we want to support different values of max chain size in the 
> future. It would be problematic for migration of cross backends, 
> consider the case when migrating from 2048 (vhost-user) to 1024 
> (qemu/vhost-kernel).
>

I think that wouldn't be a problem. If there is a possibility to change the
backend resulting in a change of config.max_change_size, a configuration
change notification can be injected to the guest, then guest will read and
get the new value.

Best,
Wei

  reply	other threads:[~2017-06-16 10:08 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 39+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-06-05  8:57 [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v1] virtio-net: enable configurable tx queue size Wei Wang
2017-06-05 15:38 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2017-06-05 15:41   ` Eric Blake
2017-06-05 15:45     ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2017-06-06  3:32   ` Wei Wang
2017-06-07  1:04   ` Wei Wang
2017-06-08 19:01     ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2017-06-09  3:00       ` Wei Wang
2017-06-12  9:30         ` [Qemu-devel] [virtio-dev] " Wei Wang
2017-06-12 20:43           ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2017-06-13  3:10             ` Wei Wang
2017-06-13  3:19               ` Jason Wang
2017-06-13  3:51                 ` Wei Wang
2017-06-13  3:55                   ` Jason Wang
2017-06-13  3:59                     ` Jason Wang
2017-06-13  6:13                       ` Wei Wang
2017-06-13  6:31                         ` Jason Wang
2017-06-13  7:49                           ` [Qemu-devel] [virtio-dev] " Wei Wang
2017-06-13  6:08                     ` [Qemu-devel] " Wei Wang
2017-06-13  6:29                       ` [Qemu-devel] [virtio-dev] " Jason Wang
2017-06-13  7:17                         ` Wei Wang
2017-06-13  9:04                           ` Jason Wang
2017-06-13  9:50                             ` Wei Wang
2017-06-13 10:46                               ` Jason Wang
2017-06-14 11:26                                 ` Jason Wang
2017-06-14 15:22                                   ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2017-06-15  4:16                                     ` Jason Wang
2017-06-15  6:52                                       ` [Qemu-devel] [virtio-dev] " Wei Wang
2017-06-16  3:22                                         ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2017-06-16  8:57                                           ` Jason Wang
2017-06-16 10:10                                             ` Wei Wang [this message]
2017-06-16 15:15                                               ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2017-06-17  8:37                                                 ` Wei Wang
2017-06-18 19:46                                                   ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2017-06-19  7:40                                                     ` Wei Wang
2017-06-16 15:19                                             ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2017-06-16 17:04                                               ` Maxime Coquelin
2017-06-16 20:33                                                 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2017-06-05 15:47 ` [Qemu-devel] " Michael S. Tsirkin

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=5943AE93.7020502@intel.com \
    --to=wei.w.wang@intel.com \
    --cc=armbru@redhat.com \
    --cc=jan.scheurich@ericsson.com \
    --cc=jasowang@redhat.com \
    --cc=marcandre.lureau@gmail.com \
    --cc=mst@redhat.com \
    --cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
    --cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
    --cc=stefanha@gmail.com \
    --cc=virtio-dev@lists.oasis-open.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).