From: Wei Wang <wei.w.wang@intel.com>
To: Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@I-love.SAKURA.ne.jp>, mst@redhat.com
Cc: virtio-dev@lists.oasis-open.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
qemu-devel@nongnu.org, virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org,
kvm@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, mhocko@kernel.org,
akpm@linux-foundation.org, mawilcox@microsoft.com,
david@redhat.com, cornelia.huck@de.ibm.com,
mgorman@techsingularity.net, aarcange@redhat.com,
amit.shah@redhat.com, pbonzini@redhat.com, willy@infradead.org,
liliang.opensource@gmail.com, yang.zhang.wz@gmail.com,
quan.xu@aliyun.com
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v16 3/5] virtio-balloon: VIRTIO_BALLOON_F_SG
Date: Wed, 11 Oct 2017 09:51:46 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <59DD7932.3070106@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <201710102209.DBE39528.MtFLOJQSFOFVOH@I-love.SAKURA.ne.jp>
On 10/10/2017 09:09 PM, Tetsuo Handa wrote:
> Wei Wang wrote:
>>> And even if we could remove balloon_lock, you still cannot use
>>> __GFP_DIRECT_RECLAIM at xb_set_page(). I think you will need to use
>>> "whether it is safe to wait" flag from
>>> "[PATCH] virtio: avoid possible OOM lockup at virtballoon_oom_notify()" .
>> Without the lock being held, why couldn't we use __GFP_DIRECT_RECLAIM at
>> xb_set_page()?
> Because of dependency shown below.
>
> leak_balloon()
> xb_set_page()
> xb_preload(GFP_KERNEL)
> kmalloc(GFP_KERNEL)
> __alloc_pages_may_oom()
> Takes oom_lock
> out_of_memory()
> blocking_notifier_call_chain()
> leak_balloon()
> xb_set_page()
> xb_preload(GFP_KERNEL)
> kmalloc(GFP_KERNEL)
> __alloc_pages_may_oom()
> Fails to take oom_lock and loop forever
__alloc_pages_may_oom() uses mutex_trylock(&oom_lock).
I think the second __alloc_pages_may_oom() will not continue since the
first one is in progress.
>
> By the way, is xb_set_page() safe?
> Sleeping in the kernel with preemption disabled is a bug, isn't it?
> __radix_tree_preload() returns 0 with preemption disabled upon success.
> xb_preload() disables preemption if __radix_tree_preload() fails.
> Then, kmalloc() is called with preemption disabled, isn't it?
> But xb_set_page() calls xb_preload(GFP_KERNEL) which might sleep with
> preemption disabled.
Yes, I think that should not be expected, thanks.
I plan to change it like this:
bool xb_preload(gfp_t gfp)
{
if (!this_cpu_read(ida_bitmap)) {
struct ida_bitmap *bitmap = kmalloc(sizeof(*bitmap), gfp);
if (!bitmap)
return false;
bitmap = this_cpu_cmpxchg(ida_bitmap, NULL, bitmap);
kfree(bitmap);
}
if (__radix_tree_preload(gfp, XB_PRELOAD_SIZE) < 0)
return false;
return true;
}
Best,
Wei
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-10-11 1:50 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-09-30 4:05 [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v16 0/5] Virtio-balloon Enhancement Wei Wang
2017-09-30 4:05 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v16 1/5] lib/xbitmap: Introduce xbitmap Wei Wang
2017-10-09 11:30 ` Tetsuo Handa
2017-09-30 4:05 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v16 2/5] radix tree test suite: add tests for xbitmap Wei Wang
2017-09-30 4:05 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v16 3/5] virtio-balloon: VIRTIO_BALLOON_F_SG Wei Wang
2017-10-02 4:30 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2017-10-02 12:39 ` Wang, Wei W
2017-10-02 13:44 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2017-10-09 15:20 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2017-10-10 7:28 ` Wei Wang
2017-10-10 11:08 ` Tetsuo Handa
2017-10-10 12:32 ` Wei Wang
2017-10-10 13:09 ` Tetsuo Handa
2017-10-11 1:51 ` Wei Wang [this message]
2017-10-11 2:26 ` Tetsuo Handa
2017-10-11 3:16 ` Wei Wang
2017-09-30 4:05 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v16 4/5] mm: support reporting free page blocks Wei Wang
2017-10-03 14:50 ` Michal Hocko
2017-09-30 4:05 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v16 5/5] virtio-balloon: VIRTIO_BALLOON_F_CTRL_VQ Wei Wang
2017-10-01 3:18 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2017-10-02 16:38 ` Wang, Wei W
2017-10-10 15:15 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2017-10-11 6:03 ` Wei Wang
2017-10-11 13:49 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2017-10-12 3:54 ` Wei Wang
2017-10-13 13:38 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2017-10-19 8:07 ` Wei Wang
2017-10-01 13:16 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v16 0/5] Virtio-balloon Enhancement Damian Tometzki
2017-10-01 13:25 ` Damian Tometzki
2017-10-09 9:39 ` Wei Wang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=59DD7932.3070106@intel.com \
--to=wei.w.wang@intel.com \
--cc=aarcange@redhat.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=amit.shah@redhat.com \
--cc=cornelia.huck@de.ibm.com \
--cc=david@redhat.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=liliang.opensource@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=mawilcox@microsoft.com \
--cc=mgorman@techsingularity.net \
--cc=mhocko@kernel.org \
--cc=mst@redhat.com \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=penguin-kernel@I-love.SAKURA.ne.jp \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=quan.xu@aliyun.com \
--cc=virtio-dev@lists.oasis-open.org \
--cc=virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org \
--cc=willy@infradead.org \
--cc=yang.zhang.wz@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).