Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v16 5/5] virtio-balloon: VIRTIO_BALLOON_F_CTRL_VQ

[Wei Wang <wei.w.wang@intel.com>]

On 10/10/2017 11:15 PM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 02, 2017 at 04:38:01PM +0000, Wang, Wei W wrote:
>> On Sunday, October 1, 2017 11:19 AM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
>>> On Sat, Sep 30, 2017 at 12:05:54PM +0800, Wei Wang wrote:
>>>> +static void ctrlq_send_cmd(struct virtio_balloon *vb,
>>>> +			  struct virtio_balloon_ctrlq_cmd *cmd,
>>>> +			  bool inbuf)
>>>> +{
>>>> +	struct virtqueue *vq = vb->ctrl_vq;
>>>> +
>>>> +	ctrlq_add_cmd(vq, cmd, inbuf);
>>>> +	if (!inbuf) {
>>>> +		/*
>>>> +		 * All the input cmd buffers are replenished here.
>>>> +		 * This is necessary because the input cmd buffers are lost
>>>> +		 * after live migration. The device needs to rewind all of
>>>> +		 * them from the ctrl_vq.
>>> Confused. Live migration somehow loses state? Why is that and why is it a good
>>> idea? And how do you know this is migration even?
>>> Looks like all you know is you got free page end. Could be any reason for this.
>>
>> I think this would be something that the current live migration lacks - what the
>> device read from the vq is not transferred during live migration, an example is the
>> stat_vq_elem:
>> Line 476 at https://github.com/qemu/qemu/blob/master/hw/virtio/virtio-balloon.c
> This does not touch guest memory though it just manipulates
> internal state to make it easier to migrate.
> It's transparent to guest as migration should be.
>
>> For all the things that are added to the vq and need to be held by the device
>> to use later need to consider the situation that live migration might happen at any
>> time and they need to be re-taken from the vq by the device on the destination
>> machine.
>>
>> So, even without this live migration optimization feature, I think all the things that are
>> added to the vq for the device to hold, need a way for the device to rewind back from
>> the vq - re-adding all the elements to the vq is a trick to keep a record of all of them
>> on the vq so that the device side rewinding can work.
>>
>> Please let me know if anything is missed or if you have other suggestions.
> IMO migration should pass enough data source to destination for
> destination to continue where source left off without guest help.
>

I'm afraid it would be difficult to pass the entire VirtQueueElement to 
the destination. I think
that would also be the reason that stats_vq_elem chose to rewind from 
the guest vq, which re-do the
virtqueue_pop() --> virtqueue_map_desc() steps (the QEMU virtual address 
to the guest physical
address relationship may be changed on the destination).


How about another direction which would be easier - using two 32-bit 
device specific configuration registers,
Host2Guest and Guest2Host command registers, to replace the ctrlq for 
command exchange:

The flow can be as follows:

1) Before Host sending a StartCMD, it flushes the free_page_vq in case 
any old free page hint is left there;

2) Host writes StartCMD to the Host2Guest register, and notifies the guest;

3) Upon receiving a configuration notification, Guest reads the 
Host2Guest register, and detaches all the used buffers from free_page_vq;
(then for each StartCMD, the free_page_vq will always have no obsolete 
free page hints, right? )

4) Guest start report free pages:
     4.1) Host may actively write StopCMD to the Host2Guest register 
before the guest finishes; or
     4.2) Guest finishes reporting, write StopCMD  the Guest2HOST 
register, which traps to QEMU, to stop.


Best,
Wei