From: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
To: Anthony PERARD <anthony.perard@citrix.com>
Cc: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>,
Stefano Stabellini <sstabellini@kernel.org>,
qemu-block@nongnu.org, Paul Durrant <paul@xen.org>,
qemu-devel@nongnu.org, Maxim Levitsky <mlevitsk@redhat.com>,
Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com>,
xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org, Max Reitz <mreitz@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] xen-block: Fix removal of backend instance via xenstore
Date: Mon, 8 Mar 2021 19:23:28 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <59c6ca73-2f26-e0fa-8b17-a319b2cae8f9@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <YEZpoHLsnp+xsGbR@perard.uk.xensource.com>
On 08/03/21 19:14, Anthony PERARD wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 08, 2021 at 06:37:38PM +0100, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
>> On 08/03/21 18:29, Anthony PERARD wrote:
>>>> If nothing else works then I guess it's okay, but why can't you do the
>>>> xen_block_drive_destroy from e.g. an unrealize callback?
>>>
>>> I'm not sure if that's possible.
>>>
>>> xen_block_device_create/xen_block_device_destroy() is supposed to be
>>> equivalent to do those qmp commands:
>>> blockdev-add node-name=xvdz-qcow2 driver=qcow2 file={"driver":"file","filename":"disk.qcow2","locking":"off"}
>>> device_add id=xvdz driver=xen-disk vdev=xvdz drive=xvdz-qcow2
>>>
>>> But I tried to add a call xen_block_drive_destroy from
>>> xen_block_unrealize, but that still is called too early, it's called
>>> before object_property_del_all() which would delete "drive" and call
>>> release_drive() which would free the node.
>>
>> Can you use blockdev_mark_auto_del? Then you don't have to call
>> xen_block_drive_destroy at all.
>
> There is no legacy_dinfo, so blockdev_mark_auto_del doesn't work.
Then I guess it's okay. Perhaps you can rename the function to
xen_block_blockdev_destroy so that it's clear it's a blockdev and no
drive. Thanks,
Paolo
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-03-08 19:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-03-08 14:32 [PATCH] xen-block: Fix removal of backend instance via xenstore Anthony PERARD via
2021-03-08 14:38 ` Paolo Bonzini
2021-03-08 17:29 ` Anthony PERARD via
2021-03-08 17:37 ` Paolo Bonzini
2021-03-08 18:14 ` Anthony PERARD via
2021-03-08 18:23 ` Paolo Bonzini [this message]
2021-03-22 14:31 ` Anthony PERARD via
2021-03-22 15:03 ` Paul Durrant
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=59c6ca73-2f26-e0fa-8b17-a319b2cae8f9@redhat.com \
--to=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=anthony.perard@citrix.com \
--cc=kwolf@redhat.com \
--cc=mlevitsk@redhat.com \
--cc=mreitz@redhat.com \
--cc=paul@xen.org \
--cc=qemu-block@nongnu.org \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=sstabellini@kernel.org \
--cc=stefanha@redhat.com \
--cc=xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).