From: "Philippe Mathieu-Daudé" <philmd@redhat.com>
To: John Snow <jsnow@redhat.com>, Cleber Rosa <crosa@redhat.com>,
Pavel Dovgalyuk <pavel.dovgaluk@ispras.ru>
Cc: "Thomas Huth" <thuth@redhat.com>,
"Eduardo Habkost" <ehabkost@redhat.com>,
"QEMU Developers" <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>,
"Wainer dos Santos Moschetta" <wainersm@redhat.com>,
"Alex Bennée" <alex.bennee@linaro.org>,
"Richard Henderson" <rth@twiddle.net>
Subject: Re: acceptance-system-fedora failures
Date: Wed, 7 Oct 2020 09:13:52 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <59d2a787-bcd4-7283-693b-09ea04c16dc6@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4e191372-c332-8f69-85e2-1ff6ead0f40d@redhat.com>
On 10/7/20 7:20 AM, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé wrote:
> On 10/7/20 1:07 AM, John Snow wrote:
>> I'm seeing this gitlab test fail quite often in my Python work; I don't
>> *think* this has anything to do with my patches, but maybe I need to try
>> and bisect this more aggressively.
>>
>> The very first hint of an error I see is on line 154:
>>
>> https://gitlab.com/jsnow/qemu/-/jobs/776334918#L154
>>
>> 22:05:36 ERROR|
>> 22:05:36 ERROR| Reproduced traceback from:
>> /builds/jsnow/qemu/build/tests/venv/lib64/python3.8/site-packages/avocado/core/test.py:753
>>
>> 22:05:36 ERROR| Traceback (most recent call last):
>> 22:05:36 ERROR| File
>> "/builds/jsnow/qemu/build/tests/acceptance/avocado_qemu/__init__.py",
>> line 171, in setUp
>> 22:05:36 ERROR| self.cancel("No QEMU binary defined or found in the
>> build tree")
>
> Last year the Avocado developers said we could have a clearer
> log error report, but meanwhile this verbose output is better
> that not having anything ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
>
>>
>> Is this a known problem?
>
> "No QEMU binary defined or found in the build tree" is not a
> problem, it means a test is skipped because the qemu-system-$ARCH
> binary is not found. In your case this is because your job
> (acceptance-system-fedora) is based on build-system-fedora
> which only build the following targets:
>
> TARGETS: tricore-softmmu microblaze-softmmu mips-softmmu
> xtensa-softmmu m68k-softmmu riscv32-softmmu ppc-softmmu
> sparc64-softmmu
>
> Now I don't understand what binary the EmptyCPUModel/Migration tests
> are expecting. Maybe these tests only work when a single target is
> built? IOW not expecting that the python code searching for a binary
> return multiple ones? -> Eduardo/Cleber.
>
> w.r.t. the error in your build, I told Thomas about the
> test_ppc_mac99/day15/invaders.elf timeouting but he said this is
> not his area. Richard has been looking yesterday to see if it is
> a TCG regression, and said the test either finished/crashed raising
> SIGCHLD, but Avocado parent is still waiting for a timeout, so the
> children become zombie and the test hang.
Expected output:
Quiescing Open Firmware ...
Booting Linux via __start() @ 0x01000000 ...
But QEMU exits in replay_char_write_event_load():
Quiescing Open Firmware ...
qemu-system-ppc: Missing character write event in the replay log
$ echo $?
1
Latest events are CHECKPOINT CHECKPOINT INTERRUPT INTERRUPT INTERRUPT.
Replay file is ~22MiB. End of record using "system_powerdown + quit"
in HMP.
I guess we have 2 bugs:
- replay log
- avocado doesn't catch children exit(1)
Quick reproducer:
$ make qemu-system-ppc check-venv
$ tests/venv/bin/python -m \
avocado --show=app,console,replay \
run --job-timeout 300 -t machine:mac99 \
tests/acceptance/replay_kernel.py
>
> Not sure that helps :)
>
> Regards,
>
> Phil.
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-10-07 7:15 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-10-06 23:07 acceptance-system-fedora failures John Snow
2020-10-07 5:20 ` Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
2020-10-07 7:13 ` Philippe Mathieu-Daudé [this message]
2020-10-07 8:23 ` Thomas Huth
2020-10-07 8:51 ` Pavel Dovgalyuk
2020-10-07 9:57 ` Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
2020-10-07 11:22 ` Alex Bennée
2020-10-07 12:20 ` Pavel Dovgalyuk
2020-10-07 12:49 ` Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
2020-10-07 13:11 ` Pavel Dovgalyuk
2020-10-08 10:26 ` Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
2020-10-08 11:50 ` Kevin Wolf
2020-10-09 10:37 ` Pavel Dovgalyuk
2020-10-13 8:57 ` Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
2020-10-07 12:17 ` Pavel Dovgalyuk
2020-10-07 14:03 ` John Snow
2020-10-07 7:23 ` Thomas Huth
2020-10-07 8:19 ` Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
2020-10-07 14:38 ` Cleber Rosa
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=59d2a787-bcd4-7283-693b-09ea04c16dc6@redhat.com \
--to=philmd@redhat.com \
--cc=alex.bennee@linaro.org \
--cc=crosa@redhat.com \
--cc=ehabkost@redhat.com \
--cc=jsnow@redhat.com \
--cc=pavel.dovgaluk@ispras.ru \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=rth@twiddle.net \
--cc=thuth@redhat.com \
--cc=wainersm@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).