From: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
To: quintela@redhat.com
Cc: "Peter Xu" <peterx@redhat.com>,
qemu-devel@nongnu.org, "Markus Armbruster" <armbru@redhat.com>,
"Leonardo Bras" <leobras@redhat.com>,
"Daniel P.Berrangé" <berrange@redhat.com>,
qemu-block@nongnu.org, "Stefan Hajnoczi" <stefanha@redhat.com>,
"Eric Blake" <eblake@redhat.com>, "Fam Zheng" <fam@euphon.net>,
"Thomas Huth" <thuth@redhat.com>,
libvir-list@redhat.com
Subject: Re: [RFC 4/6] migration: Deprecate -incoming <uri>
Date: Thu, 22 Jun 2023 11:45:28 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <59f958ac-807d-e940-e5de-8109de62eb8c@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87wmzv7ubn.fsf@secure.mitica>
On 6/22/23 10:52, Juan Quintela wrote:
> User friendliness.
> The problem is that if you use more than two channels with multifd, on
> the incoming side, you need to do:
You're sacrificing user-friendliness for the 99.99% that don't use
multifd, for an error (i.e. it's not even fixing the issue) for the
0.01% that use multifd. That's not user-friendly.
> - migrate_set_parameter multifd-channels 16
> - migrate_incoming <uri>
>
>> The issue is not how many features the command line has, but how
>> they're implemented.
>
> Or if they are confusing for the user?
Anyone using multifd is not a typical user anyway.
>> If they're just QMP wrappers and as such they're self-contained in
>> softmmu/vl.c, that's fine.
>>
>> In fact, even for parameters, we could use keyval to parse "-incoming"
>
> What is keyval?
util/keyval.c and include/qemu/keyval.h. It parses a list of key=value
pairs into a QDict. Once you have removed the "source" key from the
QDict you can use a visitor to parse the rest into a
MigrateSetParameters. See the handling of QEMU_OPTION_audio, it could
be something like
case QEMU_OPTION_incoing: {
Visitor *v;
MigrateSetParameters *incoming_params = NULL;
QDict *dict = keyval_parse(optarg, "source", NULL,
&error_fatal);
if (incoming) {
if (qdict_haskey(dict, "source")) {
error_setg(&error_fatal, "Parameter 'source' is
duplicate");
}
} else {
if (!qdict_haskey(dict, "source")) {
error_setg(&error_fatal, "Parameter 'source' is
missing");
}
runstate_set(RUN_STATE_INMIGRATE);
incoming = g_strdup(qdict_get_str(dict, "source"));
qdict_del(dict, "source");
}
v = qobject_input_visitor_new_keyval(QOBJECT(dict));
qobject_unref(dict);
visit_type_MigrateSetParameters(v, NULL,
&incoming_params, &error_fatal);
visit_free(v);
qmp_migration_set_parameters(incoming_params,
&error_fatal);
qapi_free_MigrateSetParameters(incoming_params);
}
For example "-incoming [source=]tcp:foo,multifd-channels=16" would
desugar to
migrate_set_parameter multifd-channels 16
migrate_incoming tcp:foo
The only incompatibility is for people who are using "," in an URI,
which is rare and only an issue for the "exec" protocol.
Paolo
>> and
>> set the parameters in the same place as above. That would remove the need
>> for "-global migration".
>
> Could you elaborate?
> The other option that I can think of is changing the error messages for
> migrate_check_parameters() and give instructions that you can't set
> multifd channels once that you have started incoming migration.
> Explaining there to use migrate_incoming command?
>
> Later, Juan.
>
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-06-22 9:46 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 49+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-06-12 19:33 [RFC 0/6] Migration deprecated parts Juan Quintela
2023-06-12 19:33 ` [RFC 1/6] migration: skipped field is really obsolete Juan Quintela
2023-06-20 12:01 ` Daniel P. Berrangé
2023-06-22 17:49 ` Juan Quintela
2023-06-12 19:33 ` [RFC 2/6] migration: migrate 'inc' command option is deprecated Juan Quintela
2023-06-20 12:05 ` Daniel P. Berrangé
2023-06-22 18:11 ` Juan Quintela
2023-06-12 19:33 ` [RFC 3/6] migration: migrate 'blk' " Juan Quintela
2023-06-20 12:06 ` Daniel P. Berrangé
2023-06-22 18:12 ` Juan Quintela
2023-06-12 19:33 ` [RFC 4/6] migration: Deprecate -incoming <uri> Juan Quintela
2023-06-12 19:41 ` Peter Xu
2023-06-12 20:51 ` Juan Quintela
2023-06-12 21:19 ` Peter Xu
2023-06-20 12:13 ` Daniel P. Berrangé
2023-06-22 19:34 ` Juan Quintela
2023-06-20 12:10 ` Daniel P. Berrangé
2023-06-20 14:45 ` Peter Xu
2023-06-22 8:28 ` Paolo Bonzini
2023-06-22 8:52 ` Juan Quintela
2023-06-22 9:22 ` Thomas Huth
2023-06-22 15:25 ` Peter Xu
2023-06-22 19:37 ` Juan Quintela
2023-06-22 9:45 ` Paolo Bonzini [this message]
2023-06-22 10:01 ` Juan Quintela
2023-06-22 15:24 ` Peter Xu
2023-06-22 16:03 ` Paolo Bonzini
2023-06-22 9:59 ` Daniel P. Berrangé
2023-06-22 15:54 ` Peter Xu
2023-06-22 16:33 ` Daniel P. Berrangé
2023-06-22 19:20 ` Peter Xu
2023-06-23 7:17 ` Daniel P. Berrangé
2023-06-23 14:34 ` Peter Xu
2023-06-23 8:23 ` Daniel P. Berrangé
2023-06-23 14:51 ` Peter Xu
2023-06-23 15:03 ` Daniel P. Berrangé
2023-06-21 7:08 ` Thomas Huth
2023-06-22 2:22 ` Juan Quintela
2023-06-22 8:30 ` Paolo Bonzini
2023-06-22 18:12 ` Juan Quintela
2023-06-12 19:33 ` [RFC 5/6] migration: Deprecate block migration Juan Quintela
2023-06-21 11:45 ` Stefan Hajnoczi
2023-06-22 18:17 ` Juan Quintela
2023-06-12 19:33 ` [RFC 6/6] migration: Deprecated old compression method Juan Quintela
2023-06-21 7:14 ` Thomas Huth
2023-06-22 19:21 ` Juan Quintela
2023-06-21 10:31 ` Daniel P. Berrangé
2023-06-22 19:32 ` Juan Quintela
2023-06-13 7:48 ` [RFC 0/6] Migration deprecated parts Jiri Denemark
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=59f958ac-807d-e940-e5de-8109de62eb8c@redhat.com \
--to=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=armbru@redhat.com \
--cc=berrange@redhat.com \
--cc=eblake@redhat.com \
--cc=fam@euphon.net \
--cc=leobras@redhat.com \
--cc=libvir-list@redhat.com \
--cc=peterx@redhat.com \
--cc=qemu-block@nongnu.org \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=quintela@redhat.com \
--cc=stefanha@redhat.com \
--cc=thuth@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).