From: "Longpeng (Mike)" <longpeng2@huawei.com>
To: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>
Cc: Jason Wang <jasowang@redhat.com>,
"Huangweidong (C)" <weidong.huang@huawei.com>,
"stefanha@redhat.com" <stefanha@redhat.com>,
"qemu-devel@nongnu.org" <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>,
"Wangjing (King, Euler)" <king.wang@huawei.com>,
"Gonglei (Arei)" <arei.gonglei@huawei.com>,
"Longpeng(Mike)" <longpeng.mike@gmail.com>,
yvugenfi@redhat.com
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [Question] why need to start all queues in vhost_net_start
Date: Fri, 17 Nov 2017 13:43:15 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5A0E76F3.9060100@huawei.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20171117063024-mutt-send-email-mst@kernel.org>
On 2017/11/17 12:32, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 16, 2017 at 08:04:34PM +0800, Jason Wang wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 2017年11月16日 17:32, Longpeng (Mike) wrote:
>>> Hi Jason,
>>>
>>> On 2017/11/16 17:13, Jason Wang wrote:
>>>
>>>>
>>>> On 2017年11月16日 17:01, Gonglei (Arei) wrote:
>>>>> No, Windows guest + vhost-user/DPDK.
>>>>>
>>>>> BTW pls see virtio spec in :
>>>>>
>>>>> "If VIRTIO_NET_F_MQ is negotiated, each of receiveq1. . .receiveqN that will
>>>>> be used SHOULD be populated
>>>>> with receive buffers."
>>>>>
>>>>> It is not mandatory that all queues must be initialized.
>>>> I think not, since it said we should fill receive buffers for each queue which
>>>> means we should initialize all queues. May Michael can clarify on this.
>>>>
>>>
>>> I think this doesn't matter, but QEMU should consider this scenario...
>>>
>>> For example, if one queues isn't initialized (Windows guest), the vring.avail=0,
>>> so vq->desc_phys=0, then vq->desc='a avail HVA'(which is the start addr of pc.ram).
>>>
>>> vq->desc_size = s = l = virtio_queue_get_desc_size(vdev, idx);
>>> vq->desc_phys = a = virtio_queue_get_desc_addr(vdev, idx);
>>> vq->desc = vhost_memory_map(dev, a, &l, 0);
>>> if (!vq->desc || l != s) {
>>> r = -ENOMEM;
>>> goto fail_alloc_desc;
>>> }
>>> .....
>>> r = vhost_virtqueue_set_addr(dev, vq, vhost_vq_index, dev->log_enabled);
>>> if (r < 0) {
>>> r = -errno;
>>> goto fail_alloc;
>>> }
>>>
>>> Then the HVA is send to the vhost-user.
>>>
>>> I think this is wrong, because the '0' here means guest driver doesn't init this
>>> queues, it should not be used to calculate the HVA for this vq.
>>
>> Yes, workaround is not hard if windows driver won't use the left 3 queues
>> any more. But we should have a complete solution. The main problem is when
>> vhost need to be started. For legacy device, there's no easy way to detect
>> whether or not a specific virtqueue is ready to be used. For modern device,
>> we can probably do this through queue_enable (but this is not implemented in
>> current code).
>>
>> Thanks
>
> What isn't implemented?
>
> Spec is quite explicit:
>
>
> Client must only process each ring when it is started.
>
> Client must only pass data between the ring and the
> backend, when the ring is enabled.
>
> and later:
>
>
> Client must start ring upon receiving a kick (that is, detecting that file
> descriptor is readable) on the descriptor specified by
> VHOST_USER_SET_VRING_KICK, and stop ring upon receiving
> VHOST_USER_GET_VRING_BASE.
>
>
> Does someone kick unused rings? What entity does this?
>
Hi Michael,
Maybe you don't get our point, so let me be clear. :)
Suppose there is a VM with 4 vcpus and 7 queues (vhost-user backend), the
Windows guest will only initialize the first 4 queues, so in QEMU the addresses
of the desc/avail/used tables of last 3 queues are all ZERO (initial value).
However QEMU will start all 7 queues, please look at the codes below:
'''
vhost_net_start
for (i = 0; i < total_queues; i++) // start all 7 queues
vhost_net_start_one
vhost_dev_start
vhost_virtqueue_start
'''
In vhost_virtqueue_start(), it will use the ZERO to calculate a corresponding
HVA for the last 3 queues and then send to the backend ( by
vhost_virtqueue_set_addr() ).
So our issue here is: the ZERO here means guest doesn't initialize the last 3
queues, so it needn't to calculate the HVA for them and send to then backend.
But, there is no issue on Linux guest, because Linux driver will initialize the
desc/avail/used tables for all 7 queues (even if it only uses the first 4 queues).
Jason has already get our point, now we need to obtain more information about
Windows virtio-net driver from Yan.
>
>
>
>>>
>>>> Thanks
>>>>
>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>> -Gonglei
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> .
>>>>
>>>
>
> .
>
--
Regards,
Longpeng(Mike)
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-11-17 5:44 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-11-15 14:55 [Qemu-devel] [Question] why need to start all queues in vhost_net_start Longpeng(Mike)
2017-11-15 15:05 ` Jason Wang
2017-11-15 15:54 ` Longpeng(Mike)
2017-11-16 5:53 ` Longpeng (Mike)
2017-11-16 8:11 ` Yan Vugenfirer
2017-11-16 11:42 ` Jason Wang
2017-11-16 8:54 ` Jason Wang
2017-11-16 9:01 ` Gonglei (Arei)
2017-11-16 9:09 ` Jason Wang
2017-11-16 9:13 ` Jason Wang
2017-11-16 9:32 ` Longpeng (Mike)
2017-11-16 12:04 ` Jason Wang
2017-11-17 2:01 ` Longpeng (Mike)
2017-11-17 3:46 ` Jason Wang
2017-11-17 4:32 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2017-11-17 5:43 ` Longpeng (Mike) [this message]
2017-11-17 6:44 ` Jason Wang
2017-11-16 9:08 ` Longpeng (Mike)
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=5A0E76F3.9060100@huawei.com \
--to=longpeng2@huawei.com \
--cc=arei.gonglei@huawei.com \
--cc=jasowang@redhat.com \
--cc=king.wang@huawei.com \
--cc=longpeng.mike@gmail.com \
--cc=mst@redhat.com \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=stefanha@redhat.com \
--cc=weidong.huang@huawei.com \
--cc=yvugenfi@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).