qemu-devel.nongnu.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] Don't ignore O_DIRECT flag in the 9pfs server
@ 2017-11-17  8:23 jiangyiwen
  0 siblings, 0 replies; only message in thread
From: jiangyiwen @ 2017-11-17  8:23 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: aneesh.kumar, groug, qemu-devel; +Cc: sochin.jiang, Eduard.Shishkin

Now v9fs in linux has already supported O_DIRECT(v9fs_direct_IO),
when guest user open file with O_DIRECT flag and return success,
so user hopes data doesn't pass through page cache, but 9pfs in
qemu ignore direct disk access and use host page cache, it is not
match to DIRECT_IO semantic, so we should not ignore O_DIRECT in
9pfs unless v9fs in linux don't support DIRECT_IO.

And if server fs don't support O_DIRECT, user will receive -EINVAL
and know the filesystem don't support O_DIRECT.

So in order to ensure semantic consistency, don't ignore direct
disk access in 9pfs.

Signed-off-by: Yiwen Jiang <jiangyiwen@huawei.com>
---
 hw/9pfs/9p.c | 4 ----
 1 file changed, 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/hw/9pfs/9p.c b/hw/9pfs/9p.c
index 52d4663..5ea01c4 100644
--- a/hw/9pfs/9p.c
+++ b/hw/9pfs/9p.c
@@ -155,10 +155,6 @@ static int get_dotl_openflags(V9fsState *s, int oflags)
      */
     flags = dotl_to_open_flags(oflags);
     flags &= ~(O_NOCTTY | O_ASYNC | O_CREAT);
-    /*
-     * Ignore direct disk access hint until the server supports it.
-     */
-    flags &= ~O_DIRECT;
     return flags;
 }

-- 
1.8.3.1

^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] only message in thread

only message in thread, other threads:[~2017-11-17  8:25 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: (only message) (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2017-11-17  8:23 [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] Don't ignore O_DIRECT flag in the 9pfs server jiangyiwen

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).