From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1MH2HL-0001tR-RN
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 17 Jun 2009 17:02:43 -0400
Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1MH2HG-0001nF-Vv
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 17 Jun 2009 17:02:43 -0400
Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=33583 helo=monty-python.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1MH2HG-0001mj-Ng
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 17 Jun 2009 17:02:38 -0400
Received: from mail-fx0-f209.google.com ([209.85.220.209]:38104)
	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60)
	(envelope-from <filip.navara@gmail.com>) id 1MH2HE-0005gU-OB
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 17 Jun 2009 17:02:37 -0400
Received: by fxm5 with SMTP id 5so590519fxm.34
	for <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>; Wed, 17 Jun 2009 14:02:33 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <4A3942B5.10200@borderworlds.dk>
References: <4A393D05.80609@codemonkey.ws> <4A3942B5.10200@borderworlds.dk>
Date: Wed, 17 Jun 2009 23:02:33 +0200
Message-ID: <5b31733c0906171402i4c5d142ai82a26894fb706942@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] kqemu poll results
From: Filip Navara <filip.navara@gmail.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=0016364d259732d8d7046c919cf0
List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/pipermail/qemu-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=subscribe>
To: Christian Laursen <xi@borderworlds.dk>
Cc: "qemu-devel@nongnu.org" <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>

--0016364d259732d8d7046c919cf0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

On Wed, Jun 17, 2009 at 9:23 PM, Christian Laursen <xi@borderworlds.dk>wrote:

> Anthony Liguori wrote:
>
>> http://www.micropoll.com/akira/mpresult/604126-172373
>>
>> Surprisingly, BSD host seems to be a dominating factor.
>>
>
> Until a few days ago, qemu+kqemu was the only practical way to run a
> virtual machine on FreeBSD. Virtualbox has just been committed to ports and
> a number of users will probably switch to using that now.
>
> Personally I would prefer qemu+kvm if there was a FreeBSD port of kvm. I
> probably lack both the time and skills to help with that. :(
>

http://feanor.sssup.it/~fabio/freebsd/lkvm/

--0016364d259732d8d7046c919cf0
Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

<div class=3D"gmail_quote">On Wed, Jun 17, 2009 at 9:23 PM, Christian Laurs=
en <span dir=3D"ltr">&lt;<a href=3D"mailto:xi@borderworlds.dk">xi@borderwor=
lds.dk</a>&gt;</span> wrote:<br><blockquote class=3D"gmail_quote" style=3D"=
margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex;">
<div class=3D"im">Anthony Liguori wrote:<br>
<blockquote class=3D"gmail_quote" style=3D"margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1p=
x #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
<a href=3D"http://www.micropoll.com/akira/mpresult/604126-172373" target=3D=
"_blank">http://www.micropoll.com/akira/mpresult/604126-172373</a><br>
<br>
Surprisingly, BSD host seems to be a dominating factor.<br>
</blockquote>
<br></div>
Until a few days ago, qemu+kqemu was the only practical way to run a virtua=
l machine on FreeBSD. Virtualbox has just been committed to ports and a num=
ber of users will probably switch to using that now.<br>
<br>
Personally I would prefer qemu+kvm if there was a FreeBSD port of kvm. I pr=
obably lack both the time and skills to help with that. :(<br></blockquote>=
</div><br><div><a href=3D"http://feanor.sssup.it/~fabio/freebsd/lkvm/">http=
://feanor.sssup.it/~fabio/freebsd/lkvm/</a></div>

--0016364d259732d8d7046c919cf0--