From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1MJVYt-0000an-8F for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 24 Jun 2009 12:43:03 -0400 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1MJVYo-0000WP-3p for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 24 Jun 2009 12:43:02 -0400 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=43568 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1MJVYn-0000WE-R5 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 24 Jun 2009 12:42:57 -0400 Received: from mail-ew0-f211.google.com ([209.85.219.211]:50926) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1MJVYn-0002RI-CL for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 24 Jun 2009 12:42:57 -0400 Received: by ewy7 with SMTP id 7so1268394ewy.34 for ; Wed, 24 Jun 2009 09:42:56 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <4A4252DD.70300@redhat.com> References: <4A40FB11.8090100@redhat.com> <4A411FC5.7050701@us.ibm.com> <4A412339.5000109@redhat.com> <4A412659.1080803@us.ibm.com> <20090623220204.GA5612@snarc.org> <4A415C30.7030301@us.ibm.com> <20090624010108.GA6537@snarc.org> <4A42200C.6060600@codemonkey.ws> <5b31733c0906240857g546316e0pd92fee9afe6115fa@mail.gmail.com> <4A4252DD.70300@redhat.com> Date: Wed, 24 Jun 2009 18:42:55 +0200 Message-ID: <5b31733c0906240942m61b3f31fjbd108385741f1ef8@mail.gmail.com> Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 01/11] QMP: Introduce specification file From: Filip Navara Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Avi Kivity Cc: ehabkost@redhat.com, jan.kiszka@siemens.com, dlaor@redhat.com, qemu-devel@nongnu.org, Luiz Capitulino , Vincent Hanquez On Wed, Jun 24, 2009 at 6:22 PM, Avi Kivity wrote: > On 06/24/2009 06:57 PM, Filip Navara wrote: >> >> Given the fact that we practically have the library for XDR it would >> be very easy to build Sun RPC server on top of it. So my vote is for >> SunRPC. >> > > My experience with SunRPC (NFS) has been pretty bad. =A0It may have been = due > to implementation details, not to the spec itself, but it definitely left= a > bad taste in my mouth. I have no experience with it, but the specifications looked simple and sane= . >=A0Also, I don't see a SunRPC implementation for > Python, which (along with similar languages) is an ideal platform for > controlling qemu. =A0I'd rather have something more modern. http://svn.python.org/projects/python/trunk/Demo/rpc/ http://www.cs.umd.edu/~gaburici/rpc/ Libraries are available for vast amount of languages, including Java and .N= ET. Best regards, Filip Navara