From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1MJXgj-0005Kq-UY
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 24 Jun 2009 14:59:18 -0400
Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1MJXgf-0005IW-9F
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 24 Jun 2009 14:59:17 -0400
Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=40971 helo=monty-python.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1MJXgf-0005IK-0x
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 24 Jun 2009 14:59:13 -0400
Received: from mail-ew0-f211.google.com ([209.85.219.211]:62545)
	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60)
	(envelope-from <filip.navara@gmail.com>) id 1MJXge-0000zv-7c
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 24 Jun 2009 14:59:12 -0400
Received: by ewy7 with SMTP id 7so1390168ewy.34
	for <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>; Wed, 24 Jun 2009 11:59:11 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <EC223391-A4A8-458E-8CB0-61BB627635DE@web.de>
References: <4A3D3189.1080307@redhat.com> <10665282192-BeMail@laptop>
	<20090620232508.GA29958@shareable.org>
	<7B46D10B-ECDB-4AB7-B9CD-59F7A92886BE@web.de>
	<20090624182507.GL14121@shareable.org>
	<EC223391-A4A8-458E-8CB0-61BB627635DE@web.de>
Date: Wed, 24 Jun 2009 20:59:11 +0200
Message-ID: <5b31733c0906241159j57fcea05vad21db3a29e32935@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] replace O_SYNC with O_FSYNC
From: Filip Navara <filip.navara@gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/pipermail/qemu-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=subscribe>
To: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Andreas_F=E4rber?= <andreas.faerber@web.de>
Cc: programmingkidx@gmail.com, =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Fran=E7ois_Revol?= <revol@free.fr>, Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>, qemu-devel@nongnu.org

On Wed, Jun 24, 2009 at 8:54 PM, Andreas F=E4rber<andreas.faerber@web.de> w=
rote:
>
> Am 24.06.2009 um 20:25 schrieb Jamie Lokier:
>
>> Andreas F=E4rber wrote:
>>>
>>> Am 21.06.2009 um 01:25 schrieb Jamie Lokier:
>>>
>>>> Fran=E7ois Revol wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On 06/20/2009 05:31 PM, Anthony Liguori wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Please [...] use C-style comments instead
>>>>>>> of C++ style comments. [...]
>>>>>>
>>>>>> What do we have against C++ style comments?
>>>>>
>>>>> They are not valid in C code :P
>>>>
>>>> Wrong.
>>>>
>>>> Valid in GNU C for about 14 years, and ANSI/ISO C for about 10
>>>> years...
>>>>
>>>> I'll be surprised if any C compiler used on any open source operating
>>>> system, or any major commercial C compiler, doesn't accept them.
>>>
>>> Gladly even ten-year-old GCC 2.95.x supports 'em. But even a recent
>>> GCC does not when compiled with -ansi, which is why system headers
>>> still mustn't use them.
>>
>> This is wrong too. =A0They can be used in system headers.
>
> No, that is wrong. freetype2 definitely complained when Haiku had C99
> comments in its POSIX system headers. ;)

#pragma GCC system_header

Best regards,
Filip Navara