From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1MVO4s-0001MU-KP
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 27 Jul 2009 07:09:10 -0400
Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1MVO4n-0001MA-84
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 27 Jul 2009 07:09:09 -0400
Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=50883 helo=monty-python.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1MVO4n-0001M7-2o
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 27 Jul 2009 07:09:05 -0400
Received: from mail-ew0-f217.google.com ([209.85.219.217]:49030)
	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60)
	(envelope-from <filip.navara@gmail.com>) id 1MVO4m-0003vn-G2
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 27 Jul 2009 07:09:04 -0400
Received: by ewy17 with SMTP id 17so3015524ewy.34
	for <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>; Mon, 27 Jul 2009 04:09:03 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <f43fc5580907251005r5b992225t6bd8df320b0b158c@mail.gmail.com>
References: <1248455292-12808-1-git-send-email-uli@suse.de>
	<1248455292-12808-2-git-send-email-uli@suse.de>
	<f43fc5580907251005r5b992225t6bd8df320b0b158c@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 27 Jul 2009 13:09:02 +0200
Message-ID: <5b31733c0907270409y44fe2b34y12af9d87c1876c61@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 1/4] S/390 CPU emulation
From: Filip Navara <filip.navara@gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/pipermail/qemu-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=subscribe>
To: Blue Swirl <blauwirbel@gmail.com>
Cc: aliguori@us.ibm.com, riku.voipio@iki.fi, qemu-devel@nongnu.org

On Sat, Jul 25, 2009 at 7:05 PM, Blue Swirl<blauwirbel@gmail.com> wrote:
> The line wrapping seems to be hosed somewhere.

It looks good in my mail reader.

F.