From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1MXMPQ-00074x-0v for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sat, 01 Aug 2009 17:46:32 -0400 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1MXMPL-00073e-Aq for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sat, 01 Aug 2009 17:46:31 -0400 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=43427 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1MXMPL-00073Y-0q for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sat, 01 Aug 2009 17:46:27 -0400 Received: from mail-ew0-f210.google.com ([209.85.219.210]:48446) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1MXMPK-00037i-L0 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sat, 01 Aug 2009 17:46:26 -0400 Received: by ewy6 with SMTP id 6so420979ewy.34 for ; Sat, 01 Aug 2009 14:46:25 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <865C000A1E46452DA75315BE97C8B6DA@FSCPC> References: <1249068645-6893-1-git-send-email-weil@mail.berlios.de> <865C000A1E46452DA75315BE97C8B6DA@FSCPC> Date: Sat, 1 Aug 2009 23:46:25 +0200 Message-ID: <5b31733c0908011446s340709c0q6a416aefaf00f1b9@mail.gmail.com> Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] Re: [PATCH] Win32: Fix default prefix From: Filip Navara Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Sebastian Herbszt Cc: Anthony Liguori , qemu-devel@nongnu.org, Juan Quintela On Sat, Aug 1, 2009 at 11:35 PM, Sebastian Herbszt wrote: > Stefan Weil wrote: >> >> The old code resulted in wrong escape sequences: >> >> #define CONFIG_QEMU_SHAREDIR "c:\Program Files\Qemu" >> >> gcc warnings: >> >> vl.c:5708:20: warning: unknown escape sequence '\P' >> vl.c:5708:20: warning: unknown escape sequence '\Q' > > Looks like this got broken by "Generate config-host.h from config-host.mak" > (create_config). > >> Windows can handle slash (/) path separators, >> and QEMU already adds directories using slash, >> so there is no need to fight with the correct number >> of backslashes. > > Do all versions handle them correctly? At least all NT-based versions do and I believe Win 9x handles them correctly too. Best regards, Filip Navara