From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1NAXhh-00058X-VE
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 17 Nov 2009 18:43:22 -0500
Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1NAXhd-00055a-BH
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 17 Nov 2009 18:43:21 -0500
Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=58241 helo=monty-python.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1NAXhd-000558-2K
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 17 Nov 2009 18:43:17 -0500
Received: from mail-bw0-f212.google.com ([209.85.218.212]:56199)
	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60)
	(envelope-from <filip.navara@gmail.com>) id 1NAXhc-0005zx-Mn
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 17 Nov 2009 18:43:16 -0500
Received: by bwz4 with SMTP id 4so664271bwz.2
	for <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>; Tue, 17 Nov 2009 15:43:15 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <20091117192315.GB13844@rain>
References: <20091115204930.GA25677@rain>
	<5b31733c0911170139p5cea3594xf15ddfc2cf057e9b@mail.gmail.com>
	<20091117192315.GB13844@rain>
Date: Wed, 18 Nov 2009 00:43:15 +0100
Message-ID: <5b31733c0911171543m6616b3d4nbdadc914f89315f1@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 2/2] [RFC] add emulation of at91sam9263 cpu
From: Filip Navara <filip.navara@gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/pipermail/qemu-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=subscribe>
To: Evgeniy Dushistov <dushistov@mail.ru>
Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org

On Tue, Nov 17, 2009 at 8:23 PM, Evgeniy Dushistov <dushistov@mail.ru> wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 17, 2009 at 10:39:27AM +0100, Filip Navara wrote:
>> I'd say it is preferable to split the individual devices and model
>> them using the QDEV infrastructure instead of putting it all together
>> into one "system controller" device.
>>
>> I've QDEV-based implementation of these devices already: PMC, DBGU,
>> PIO, PITC, AIC. That leaves the "bus matrix", SDRAM controller and
>> USART (which is very similar to DBGU) to be split up.
>>
>
> I also see ethernet IP block (emac),
> I have plans to implement it,
> what about USB slave and CAN controller, you plan/have implementations
> of them?

The EMAC emulation is fully functional and good enough to run a
FreeRTOS/uIP web server and all Atmel examples. I do not plan to
implement USB slave or CAN controller, but I would certainly welcome
if you (or someone else) implemented it. If anything then I will
implement I2C.

Best regards,
Filip Navara