From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1FEjeN-0006OP-BA
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 02 Mar 2006 03:59:07 -0500
Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1FEjeH-0006ML-LL
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 02 Mar 2006 03:59:05 -0500
Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1FEi1k-0002tB-PP
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 02 Mar 2006 02:15:11 -0500
Received: from [64.233.162.202] (helo=zproxy.gmail.com)
	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.52) id 1FEZfl-0002DG-O6
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 01 Mar 2006 17:19:53 -0500
Received: by zproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id s1so263266nze
	for <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>; Wed, 01 Mar 2006 14:18:29 -0800 (PST)
Message-ID: <5b5833aa0603011418j33a74eb4ob9bde3906cad8790@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 1 Mar 2006 18:18:29 -0400
From: "Anderson Lizardo" <anderson.lizardo@gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Disposition: inline
Subject: [Qemu-devel] qemu regression 0.7.2 -> 0.8.0 (ARM user emulation)
Reply-To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org
List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/pipermail/qemu-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=subscribe>
To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org

Hi,

I was having some issues with the latest qemu (ARM user emulation),
which I tracked down to the following reduced test case:

#include <stdio.h>
int main(void)
{
        float a, b;
        a =3D 0.1f;
        b =3D 0.8f;
        printf("a < b: %d\n", (a < b));
        return 0;
}

Compile it with an ARM cross-compiler and run it with "qemu-arm". It
should print

a < b: 1

for qemu 0.7.2 and

a < b: 0

for 0.8.0. Obviously, the first one is right.

Tested with the following setup:
qemu 0.7.2/0.8.0
arm-linux-gnu-gcc (GCC) 3.4.5
glibc 2.3.5

--
Anderson Lizardo
Embedded Linux Lab - 10LE
Nokia Institute of Technology - INdT
Manaus - Brazil