From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1LppOa-00020e-5G for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 03 Apr 2009 15:49:44 -0400 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1LppOZ-000201-7b for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 03 Apr 2009 15:49:43 -0400 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=35041 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1LppOZ-0001zv-58 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 03 Apr 2009 15:49:43 -0400 Received: from yw-out-1718.google.com ([74.125.46.158]:43558) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1LppOY-0006Vt-PI for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 03 Apr 2009 15:49:42 -0400 Received: by yw-out-1718.google.com with SMTP id 9so753491ywk.82 for ; Fri, 03 Apr 2009 12:49:42 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: References: <5c3e8b1b0903282143i47583269pbbd2c50df2449dcc@mail.gmail.com> <5c3e8b1b0903312204v7473a523i3c33bcb676f19ee4@mail.gmail.com> <5c3e8b1b0904011258g389eaf6cvc7c38791f99fd25e@mail.gmail.com> <5c3e8b1b0904011429h5bdf3c3ei949da7d1505b623c@mail.gmail.com> <5c3e8b1b0904011517v5fa230b5m4e5ed25dbd6be3ee@mail.gmail.com> <5c3e8b1b0904022140k6e214491q701e3b2a64b0ee2e@mail.gmail.com> Date: Fri, 3 Apr 2009 12:49:41 -0700 Message-ID: <5c3e8b1b0904031249u748e5e64y6c9239cab47ce38a@mail.gmail.com> Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] qemu working openbsd/sparc64 yet? From: Vivek Ayer Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Reply-To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org That's weird because I'm using 4.3. Does QEMU expect X to be on when you run it? I'm doing this over ssh to a terminal and thought since I disable X support in Qemu, it would default to ncurses. In any case, I had a segfault when starting it trying to emulate opensolaris martux (SPARC/32-bit), which I guess is solaris 10, so I guess that could be the reason it didn't work. I'll try reproducing the error. Also, I didn't enable the sparc64 targets in the target list. I used ./configure --prefix=3D/usr/local --target-list=3D"sparc-softmmu sparc-bsd-user" --disable-sdl --disable-gfx-check. I'll try the svn code, but I doubt that'll help. Vivek On Fri, Apr 3, 2009 at 9:58 AM, Blue Swirl wrote: > On 4/3/09, Vivek Ayer wrote: >> How did you build it without getting an error in sdl.c specifically at >> =A0X11/Xlib.h? I tried disabling sdl and it built fine, but the images >> =A0weren't loading, so I thought I'd go with the default options except >> =A0for the target list. > > I'm using -current, but I didn't have compile problems with 4.1 (IIRC). > > But this reminds me that I found a bug in SDL which made SDL apps > crash when running on Sparc with $DISPLAY pointing to x86 X server. > This bug was fixed in upstream SDL, but 4.1 still has the broken > version. > > >