qemu-devel.nongnu.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Max Reitz <mreitz@redhat.com>
To: Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com>, qemu-devel@nongnu.org
Cc: qemu-block@nongnu.org, Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>,
	QingFeng Hao <haoqf@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH for-2.12 v2] qemu-iotests: update 185 output
Date: Wed, 4 Apr 2018 18:16:12 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <5c93e912-9d6a-214c-e4fb-8a4e6fc6e7f9@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180404150146.23281-1-stefanha@redhat.com>

On 2018-04-04 17:01, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote:
> Commit 4486e89c219c0d1b9bd8dfa0b1dd5b0d51ff2268 ("vl: introduce
> vm_shutdown()") added a bdrv_drain_all() call.  As a side-effect of the
> drain operation the block job iterates one more time than before.  The
> 185 output no longer matches and the test is failing now.
> 
> It may be possible to avoid the superfluous block job iteration, but
> that type of patch is not suitable late in the QEMU 2.12 release cycle.
> 
> This patch simply updates the 185 output file.  The new behavior is
> correct, just not optimal, so make the test pass again.
> 
> Fixes: 4486e89c219c0d1b9bd8dfa0b1dd5b0d51ff2268 ("vl: introduce vm_shutdown()")
> Cc: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
> Cc: QingFeng Hao <haoqf@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
> Signed-off-by: Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com>
> ---
>  tests/qemu-iotests/185     | 10 ++++++----
>  tests/qemu-iotests/185.out | 12 +++++++-----
>  2 files changed, 13 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)

On tmpfs, this isn't enough to let the test pass.  There, the active
commit job finishes before the quit is sent, resulting in this diff:

--- tests/qemu-iotests/185.out      2018-04-04 18:10:02.015935435 +0200
+++ tests/qemu-iotests/185.out.bad  2018-04-04 18:10:21.045473817 +0200
@@ -26,9 +26,9 @@

 {"return": {}}
 {"return": {}}
+{"timestamp": {"seconds":  TIMESTAMP, "microseconds":  TIMESTAMP},
"event": "BLOCK_JOB_READY", "data": {"device": "disk", "len": 4194304,
"offset": 4194304, "speed": 65536, "type": "commit"}}
 {"return": {}}
 {"timestamp": {"seconds":  TIMESTAMP, "microseconds":  TIMESTAMP},
"event": "SHUTDOWN", "data": {"guest": false}}
-{"timestamp": {"seconds":  TIMESTAMP, "microseconds":  TIMESTAMP},
"event": "BLOCK_JOB_READY", "data": {"device": "disk", "len": 4194304,
"offset": 4194304, "speed": 65536, "type": "commit"}}
 {"timestamp": {"seconds":  TIMESTAMP, "microseconds":  TIMESTAMP},
"event": "BLOCK_JOB_COMPLETED", "data": {"device": "disk", "len":
4194304, "offset": 4194304, "speed": 65536, "type": "commit"}}

 === Start mirror job and exit qemu ===

This seems to be independent of whether there is actually data on
TEST_IMG (the commit source), so something doesn't seem quite right with
the block job throttling here...?

Max

  parent reply	other threads:[~2018-04-04 16:16 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-04-04 15:01 [Qemu-devel] [PATCH for-2.12 v2] qemu-iotests: update 185 output Stefan Hajnoczi
2018-04-04 15:40 ` Eric Blake
2018-04-04 16:16 ` Max Reitz [this message]
2018-04-09  7:24   ` [Qemu-devel] [Qemu-block] " Stefan Hajnoczi
2018-04-10  8:11   ` [Qemu-devel] " Stefan Hajnoczi
2018-04-10 14:35     ` Kevin Wolf
2018-04-11 10:32     ` Max Reitz
2018-04-09  1:58 ` QingFeng Hao

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=5c93e912-9d6a-214c-e4fb-8a4e6fc6e7f9@redhat.com \
    --to=mreitz@redhat.com \
    --cc=haoqf@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=kwolf@redhat.com \
    --cc=qemu-block@nongnu.org \
    --cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
    --cc=stefanha@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).