From: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
To: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>,
Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>, Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com>
Cc: "Peter Maydell" <peter.maydell@linaro.org>,
"Philippe Mathieu-Daudé" <f4bug@amsat.org>,
qemu-devel@nongnu.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] docs/devel: memory: Document MemoryRegionOps requirement
Date: Mon, 6 Sep 2021 14:25:49 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5ca64439-7d68-e7d4-975c-429a9e744825@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210906122020.5793-1-bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
On 06.09.21 14:20, Bin Meng wrote:
> It's been a requirement that at least one function pointer for read
> and one for write are provided ever since the MemoryRegion APIs were
> introduced in 2012.
>
> Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
> ---
>
> docs/devel/memory.rst | 5 +++++
> 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/docs/devel/memory.rst b/docs/devel/memory.rst
> index 5dc8a12682..7b589b21d2 100644
> --- a/docs/devel/memory.rst
> +++ b/docs/devel/memory.rst
> @@ -344,6 +344,11 @@ based on the attributes used for the memory transaction, or need
> to be able to respond that the access should provoke a bus error
> rather than completing successfully; those devices can use the
> ->read_with_attrs() and ->write_with_attrs() callbacks instead.
> +The requirement for a device's MemoryRegionOps is that at least
> +one callback for read and one for write are provided. If both
> +->read() and ->read_with_attrs() are provided, the plain ->read()
> +version takes precedence over the with_attrs() version. So does
> +the write callback.
Reviewed-by: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
--
Thanks,
David / dhildenb
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-09-06 12:29 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-09-06 12:20 [PATCH] docs/devel: memory: Document MemoryRegionOps requirement Bin Meng
2021-09-06 12:25 ` David Hildenbrand [this message]
2021-09-06 13:01 ` Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
2021-09-08 18:50 ` Peter Xu
2021-09-08 20:17 ` Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
2021-10-02 14:37 ` Bin Meng
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=5ca64439-7d68-e7d4-975c-429a9e744825@redhat.com \
--to=david@redhat.com \
--cc=bmeng.cn@gmail.com \
--cc=f4bug@amsat.org \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=peter.maydell@linaro.org \
--cc=peterx@redhat.com \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).