From: Max Reitz <mreitz@redhat.com>
To: Maxim Levitsky <mlevitsk@redhat.com>, qemu-devel@nongnu.org
Cc: Fam Zheng <fam@euphon.net>, Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
John Snow <jsnow@redhat.com>,
qemu-block@nongnu.org, Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v3 1/6] block/nvme: don't touch the completion entries
Date: Mon, 8 Jul 2019 14:23:58 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5d32c846-1ff6-ec99-af20-8e7a794c4fe2@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <d009ad68b237aae51d327955367dc2356f33bba0.camel@redhat.com>
[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1587 bytes --]
On 07.07.19 10:43, Maxim Levitsky wrote:
> On Fri, 2019-07-05 at 13:03 +0200, Max Reitz wrote:
>> On 03.07.19 17:59, Maxim Levitsky wrote:
>>> Completion entries are meant to be only read by the host and written by the device.
>>> The driver is supposed to scan the completions from the last point where it left,
>>> and until it sees a completion with non flipped phase bit.
>>
>> (Disclaimer: This is the first time I read the nvme driver, or really
>> something in the nvme spec.)
>>
>> Well, no, completion entries are also meant to be initialized by the
>> host. To me it looks like this is the place where that happens:
>> Everything that has been processed by the device is immediately being
>> re-initialized.
>>
>> Maybe we shouldn’t do that here but in nvme_submit_command(). But
>> currently we don’t, and I don’t see any other place where we currently
>> initialize the CQ entries.
>
> Hi!
> I couldn't find any place in the spec that says that completion entries should be initialized.
> It is probably wise to initialize that area to 0 on driver initialization, but nothing beyond that.
Ah, you’re right, I misread. I didn’t pay as much attention to the
“...prior to setting CC.EN to ‘1’” as I should have. Yep, and that is
done in nvme_init_queue().
OK, I cease my wrongful protest:
Reviewed-by: Max Reitz <mreitz@redhat.com>
> In particular that is what the kernel nvme driver does.
> Other that allocating a zeroed memory (and even that I am not sure it does),
> it doesn't write to the completion entrie
[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 488 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-07-08 12:26 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-07-03 15:59 [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v3 0/6] Few fixes for userspace NVME driver Maxim Levitsky
2019-07-03 15:59 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v3 1/6] block/nvme: don't touch the completion entries Maxim Levitsky
2019-07-05 11:03 ` Max Reitz
2019-07-07 8:43 ` Maxim Levitsky
2019-07-08 12:23 ` Max Reitz [this message]
2019-07-08 12:51 ` Maxim Levitsky
2019-07-08 13:00 ` Max Reitz
2019-07-08 13:06 ` Maxim Levitsky
2019-07-03 15:59 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v3 2/6] block/nvme: fix doorbell stride Maxim Levitsky
2019-07-05 11:09 ` Max Reitz
2019-07-05 11:10 ` Max Reitz
2019-07-07 8:47 ` Maxim Levitsky
2019-07-03 15:59 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v3 3/6] block/nvme: support larger that 512 bytes sector devices Maxim Levitsky
2019-07-05 11:58 ` Max Reitz
2019-07-07 8:51 ` Maxim Levitsky
2019-07-03 15:59 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v3 4/6] block/nvme: add support for image creation Maxim Levitsky
2019-07-05 12:09 ` Max Reitz
2019-07-07 9:03 ` Maxim Levitsky
2019-07-03 15:59 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v3 5/6] block/nvme: add support for write zeros Maxim Levitsky
2019-07-05 13:33 ` Max Reitz
2019-07-07 9:19 ` Maxim Levitsky
2019-07-03 15:59 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v3 6/6] block/nvme: add support for discard Maxim Levitsky
2019-07-03 16:07 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v4] " Maxim Levitsky
2019-07-05 13:50 ` Max Reitz
2019-07-07 9:40 ` Maxim Levitsky
2019-07-03 20:43 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v3 0/6] Few fixes for userspace NVME driver no-reply
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=5d32c846-1ff6-ec99-af20-8e7a794c4fe2@redhat.com \
--to=mreitz@redhat.com \
--cc=fam@euphon.net \
--cc=jsnow@redhat.com \
--cc=kwolf@redhat.com \
--cc=mlevitsk@redhat.com \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=qemu-block@nongnu.org \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).