From: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
To: Sergio Lopez <slp@redhat.com>, Pavel Butsykin <pbutsykin@virtuozzo.com>
Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org, Fam Zheng <famz@redhat.com>,
stefanha@redhat.com, qemu-block@nongnu.org
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v3] util/async: use atomic_mb_set in qemu_bh_cancel
Date: Wed, 8 Nov 2017 15:15:27 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5d4d9db6-f740-c114-9f21-d575eb2d897f@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAAiTLFV80SfMneuhs7tdYENOb+zV7kJ43B9ZgALk2tva1ZDpUw@mail.gmail.com>
On 08/11/2017 15:10, Sergio Lopez wrote:
>> I'm not quite sure that the pre-fetched is involved in this issue,
>> because pre-fetch reading a certain addresses should be invalidated by
>> write on another core to the same addresses. In our case write
>> req->state = THREAD_DONE should invalidate read req->state == THREAD_DONE.
>> I am inclined to think that there is a memory-reordering read with
>> write. It's a very real case for x86 and I don't see the reasons which
>> can prevent it:
>>
> Yes, you're right. This is actually a memory reordering issue. I'm
> going to rewrite that paragraph.
Well, memory reordering _is_ caused by speculative prefetching, delayed
cache invalidation (store buffers), and so on.
But it's probably better indeed to replace "pre-fetched" with
"outdated". Whoever commits the patch can do the substitution (I can too).
Paolo
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-11-08 14:15 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-11-08 6:34 [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v3] util/async: use atomic_mb_set in qemu_bh_cancel Sergio Lopez
2017-11-08 9:24 ` [Qemu-devel] [Qemu-block] " Stefan Hajnoczi
2017-11-08 13:50 ` [Qemu-devel] " Pavel Butsykin
2017-11-08 14:10 ` Sergio Lopez
2017-11-08 14:15 ` Paolo Bonzini [this message]
2017-11-08 14:24 ` Sergio Lopez
2017-11-08 14:32 ` Pavel Butsykin
2017-11-08 19:21 ` Stefan Hajnoczi
2017-11-08 16:36 ` Pavel Butsykin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=5d4d9db6-f740-c114-9f21-d575eb2d897f@redhat.com \
--to=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=famz@redhat.com \
--cc=pbutsykin@virtuozzo.com \
--cc=qemu-block@nongnu.org \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=slp@redhat.com \
--cc=stefanha@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).