From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1KzbqV-0003cu-II
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 10 Nov 2008 13:50:43 -0500
Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1KzbqU-0003cG-3c
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 10 Nov 2008 13:50:42 -0500
Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=56493 helo=monty-python.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1KzbqT-0003cA-Uz
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 10 Nov 2008 13:50:41 -0500
Received: from qw-out-1920.google.com ([74.125.92.150]:33388)
	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60)
	(envelope-from <glommer@gmail.com>) id 1KzbqT-0005CN-N5
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 10 Nov 2008 13:50:41 -0500
Received: by qw-out-1920.google.com with SMTP id 5so1787368qwc.4
	for <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>; Mon, 10 Nov 2008 10:50:40 -0800 (PST)
Message-ID: <5d6222a80811101050v1282a2e5y6eaee100b72b936f@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 10 Nov 2008 16:50:40 -0200
From: "Glauber Costa" <glommer@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 0/4] VGA optimization
In-Reply-To: <491881D4.5000203@codemonkey.ws>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
References: <1226342253-8887-1-git-send-email-glommer@redhat.com>
	<49187FC8.60107@codemonkey.ws> <491881D4.5000203@codemonkey.ws>
Reply-To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org
List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/pipermail/qemu-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=subscribe>
To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org

On Mon, Nov 10, 2008 at 4:47 PM, Anthony Liguori <anthony@codemonkey.ws> wrote:
> Anthony Liguori wrote:
>>
>> Glauber Costa wrote:
>>>
>>> hey guys,
>>>
>>
>> I gave you some bad advice that I think is causing the breakage I'm seeing
>> now.  I suggested that you simply do a lookup to find the slot given a
>> target_phys_addr_t but that isn't correct.  Let me explain why.
>
> Except I'm completely backwards but at least consistently backwards :-)

Which is amazing ;-) Your text made perfect sense after a sed line ;-)




-- 
Glauber  Costa.
"Free as in Freedom"
http://glommer.net

"The less confident you are, the more serious you have to act."