From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1LUk8r-0004M6-DA
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 04 Feb 2009 10:58:21 -0500
Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1LUk8q-0004Ln-WB
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 04 Feb 2009 10:58:21 -0500
Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=50007 helo=monty-python.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1LUk8q-0004Lk-Oq
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 04 Feb 2009 10:58:20 -0500
Received: from qw-out-1920.google.com ([74.125.92.146]:4174)
	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60)
	(envelope-from <glommer@gmail.com>) id 1LUk8q-0003WO-Kk
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 04 Feb 2009 10:58:20 -0500
Received: by qw-out-1920.google.com with SMTP id 5so643658qwc.4
	for <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>; Wed, 04 Feb 2009 07:58:18 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <4988AD96.6090308@codemonkey.ws>
References: <4988AD96.6090308@codemonkey.ws>
Date: Wed, 4 Feb 2009 13:58:18 -0200
Message-ID: <5d6222a80902040758t416f3fedt9154804cb0ade653@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] Cutting a new QEMU release
From: Glauber Costa <glommer@gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Reply-To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org
List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/pipermail/qemu-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=subscribe>
To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org

On Tue, Feb 3, 2009 at 6:48 PM, Anthony Liguori <anthony@codemonkey.ws> wrote:
> What do people think?  TCG seems to be in a good place.  We've got virtio,
> KVM, live migration, tons of new devices, bsd-user, etc.
>
> We could decide to cut one by the end of the month.  I'm already doing some
> test work in QEMU so I can follow up with some more detailed notes about
> what is working and what isn't working.  That gives us some time to decide
> if there's anything we need to fix before a release.

As a curiosity, what would be the preferred version number? 0.9.2?
0.10 ? 1.0 ? "Phoenix"?
"Crisis Release" ?


-- 
Glauber  Costa.
"Free as in Freedom"
http://glommer.net

"The less confident you are, the more serious you have to act."