From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1LrcBM-0004Pp-34
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 08 Apr 2009 14:07:28 -0400
Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1LrcBH-0004PX-P0
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 08 Apr 2009 14:07:27 -0400
Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=53130 helo=monty-python.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1LrcBH-0004PU-I1
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 08 Apr 2009 14:07:23 -0400
Received: from mail-qy0-f111.google.com ([209.85.221.111]:42570)
	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60)
	(envelope-from <glommer@gmail.com>) id 1LrcBH-0006kY-4w
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 08 Apr 2009 14:07:23 -0400
Received: by qyk9 with SMTP id 9so414887qyk.4
	for <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>; Wed, 08 Apr 2009 11:07:21 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <200904081847.07083.paul@codesourcery.com>
References: <5d6222a80904081006w65228ac7k3b6e759e08f4c8b3@mail.gmail.com>
	<5d6222a80904081025j1644b6bay17d1ff942247971@mail.gmail.com>
	<20090408.113954.-1962672847.imp@bsdimp.com>
	<200904081847.07083.paul@codesourcery.com>
Date: Wed, 8 Apr 2009 15:07:20 -0300
Message-ID: <5d6222a80904081107t55accbdag1d4621726cd3ba2c@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] Re: start qemu failed with --enable-kvm -vga std
From: Glauber Costa <glommer@gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Reply-To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org
List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/pipermail/qemu-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=subscribe>
To: Paul Brook <paul@codesourcery.com>
Cc: glommer@redhat.com, qemu-devel@nongnu.org

On Wed, Apr 8, 2009 at 2:47 PM, Paul Brook <paul@codesourcery.com> wrote:
> On Wednesday 08 April 2009, M. Warner Losh wrote:
>> In message: <5d6222a80904081025j1644b6bay17d1ff942247971@mail.gmail.com>
>>
>> =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 Glauber Costa <glommer@gmail.c=
om> writes:
>> : In all seriousness, no matter how good your series for improving kvm
>> : registration
>> : are, it is unlikely to hit the stable branch. So I believe a good deal
>> : would have something
>> : on the line of this patch applied to stable, leaving unstable as is,
>> : until we can find a better
>> : solution.
>>
>> Huh? =C2=A0It is unlikely to be merged into stable, so let's commit it t=
o
>> stable?
>
> I think the suggestion is that we apply an ugly hack on just the stable
> branch, and fix it properly later on the development.
>
> FWIW I think this is a bad idea. We should never fix something on the sta=
ble
> branch that isn't also fixed on the development branch. If the changes ar=
e
> causing problems, then my suggestion is to revert the original change (i.=
e.
> the support for >64k roms).

Just checked, and the > 64 roms patch is not on stable branch.

So this is a non issue.


--=20
Glauber  Costa.
"Free as in Freedom"
http://glommer.net

"The less confident you are, the more serious you have to act."