From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1MWG4Y-0000Nv-2d for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 29 Jul 2009 16:48:26 -0400 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1MWG4T-0000MS-O8 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 29 Jul 2009 16:48:25 -0400 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=55220 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1MWG4T-0000MP-F5 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 29 Jul 2009 16:48:21 -0400 Received: from an-out-0708.google.com ([209.85.132.246]:52879) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1MWG4S-0006Ly-6K for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 29 Jul 2009 16:48:21 -0400 Received: by an-out-0708.google.com with SMTP id c38so508909ana.37 for ; Wed, 29 Jul 2009 13:48:15 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20090729154837.3f1872f2@doriath> References: <1248865418-32604-1-git-send-email-bjorn@mork.no> <20090729154837.3f1872f2@doriath> Date: Wed, 29 Jul 2009 17:48:13 -0300 Message-ID: <5d6222a80907291348r3c25c802if1b844f3bdae11e3@mail.gmail.com> Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] kvm: add kvm version to the "info kvm" monitor command From: Glauber Costa Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Luiz Capitulino Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org, =?UTF-8?Q?Bj=C3=B8rn_Mork?= On Wed, Jul 29, 2009 at 3:48 PM, Luiz Capitulino wr= ote: > On Wed, 29 Jul 2009 13:03:38 +0200 > Bj=C3=B8rn Mork wrote: > >> There isn't a one-to-one mapping between the KVM version and >> the QEMU version output from "info version". =C2=A0Complete the >> picture by adding the KVM version to the existing "info kvm" >> monitor command. >> >> =C2=A0(qemu) info kvm >> =C2=A0kvm support: enabled >> =C2=A0kvm version: kvm-85 > > =C2=A0Doesn't seem a good idea, as this is considered a stable protocol. > > =C2=A0Either, we should check current users or add 'info kvm-version'. can't see why. We recently added information to info migrate, and many othe= rs. If we are using a new line, shouldn't matter, since it is expected that par= sers for those things would be line based. Not only I'd like to see this, I would also like to see information of kvm itself being more verbose, like whether or not we have in kernel irqchip/pit --=20 Glauber Costa. "Free as in Freedom" http://glommer.net "The less confident you are, the more serious you have to act."