From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1NrzDv-0002q2-Q4 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 17 Mar 2010 15:48:11 -0400 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=53520 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1NrzDv-0002ob-6O for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 17 Mar 2010 15:48:11 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by monty-python.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1NrzDu-0004QG-6R for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 17 Mar 2010 15:48:10 -0400 Received: from mail-pv0-f173.google.com ([74.125.83.173]:44714) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1NrzDt-0004Q8-Tb for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 17 Mar 2010 15:48:10 -0400 Received: by pvf33 with SMTP id 33so736633pvf.4 for ; Wed, 17 Mar 2010 12:48:08 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <5d649bdb1003110144jaa4d6cev61ebf0503a601c3c@mail.gmail.com> References: <5d649bdb1003110144jaa4d6cev61ebf0503a601c3c@mail.gmail.com> Date: Wed, 17 Mar 2010 12:48:07 -0700 Message-ID: <5d649bdb1003171248i501cdad9i6dc70c505c083d45@mail.gmail.com> From: Neo Jia Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Subject: [Qemu-devel] Re: guest kernel debugging through serial port List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: kvm@vger.kernel.org Cc: Michael Tokarev , qemu-devel@nongnu.org Here is what I have asked before. The problem that I want to assign a real serial port to the guest is that the debugging through network becomes really slow. Thanks, Neo On Thu, Mar 11, 2010 at 2:44 AM, Neo Jia wrote: > hi, > > I have followed the windows guest debugging procedure from > http://www.linux-kvm.org/page/WindowsGuestDrivers/GuestDebugging. And > it works when I start two guests and bind tcp port to guest serial > port, but it is really slow. > > And if I use -serial /dev/ttyS1 for the guest debugging target, I > can't talk to it from my dev machine that has connected to ttyS1 with > target machine (host). > > Is this a known problem? > > Thanks, > Neo > > -- > I would remember that if researchers were not ambitious > probably today we haven't the technology we are using! > -- I would remember that if researchers were not ambitious probably today we haven't the technology we are using!